探讨许可通知对用户对应用商店初始信任的影响——以中国Android应用市场为例

Jie Gu, Heng Xu, An'an Hu, Lihua Huang
{"title":"探讨许可通知对用户对应用商店初始信任的影响——以中国Android应用市场为例","authors":"Jie Gu, Heng Xu, An'an Hu, Lihua Huang","doi":"10.1109/ISI.2015.7165941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Privacy invasion via mobile applications is a big issue in the mobile age. This study focuses on China's Android market where a few application stores are available to adopt applications. Recognizing that these stores vary in presenting permission notice, this study examines the effect of two features of a permission notice, i.e., permission sensitivity and permission explanation, on Android users' privacy-related perceptions. Results of our scenario-based study suggest that while the disclosure of highly sensitive permissions increases users' privacy concerns to an application, it also boosts users' initial trust to an unfamiliar application store. Moreover, users' trust to the application store is a necessary condition for the efficiency of permission explanation to reduce users' privacy concerns. In addition to enhancing our theoretical understanding of the role of initial trust in Chinese Android users' elaboration of permission notice, these findings have important implications for both China's application stores and application developers.","PeriodicalId":292352,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the effect of permission notice on users' initial trust to an application store: The case of China's Android application market\",\"authors\":\"Jie Gu, Heng Xu, An'an Hu, Lihua Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISI.2015.7165941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Privacy invasion via mobile applications is a big issue in the mobile age. This study focuses on China's Android market where a few application stores are available to adopt applications. Recognizing that these stores vary in presenting permission notice, this study examines the effect of two features of a permission notice, i.e., permission sensitivity and permission explanation, on Android users' privacy-related perceptions. Results of our scenario-based study suggest that while the disclosure of highly sensitive permissions increases users' privacy concerns to an application, it also boosts users' initial trust to an unfamiliar application store. Moreover, users' trust to the application store is a necessary condition for the efficiency of permission explanation to reduce users' privacy concerns. In addition to enhancing our theoretical understanding of the role of initial trust in Chinese Android users' elaboration of permission notice, these findings have important implications for both China's application stores and application developers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":292352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI)\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISI.2015.7165941\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISI.2015.7165941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在移动时代,通过移动应用程序侵犯隐私是一个大问题。本研究的重点是中国的Android市场,这里有一些应用商店可以采用应用程序。认识到这些商店在提供许可通知方面各不相同,本研究考察了许可通知的两个特征(即许可敏感性和许可解释)对Android用户隐私相关感知的影响。我们基于场景的研究结果表明,虽然高度敏感权限的披露增加了用户对应用程序的隐私担忧,但它也增强了用户对不熟悉的应用程序商店的初始信任。此外,用户对应用商店的信任是权限解释效率降低用户隐私担忧的必要条件。除了增强我们对初始信任在中国Android用户阐述许可通知中的作用的理论认识外,这些研究结果对中国的应用商店和应用开发者都具有重要的启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the effect of permission notice on users' initial trust to an application store: The case of China's Android application market
Privacy invasion via mobile applications is a big issue in the mobile age. This study focuses on China's Android market where a few application stores are available to adopt applications. Recognizing that these stores vary in presenting permission notice, this study examines the effect of two features of a permission notice, i.e., permission sensitivity and permission explanation, on Android users' privacy-related perceptions. Results of our scenario-based study suggest that while the disclosure of highly sensitive permissions increases users' privacy concerns to an application, it also boosts users' initial trust to an unfamiliar application store. Moreover, users' trust to the application store is a necessary condition for the efficiency of permission explanation to reduce users' privacy concerns. In addition to enhancing our theoretical understanding of the role of initial trust in Chinese Android users' elaboration of permission notice, these findings have important implications for both China's application stores and application developers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信