贝克梅大坝最佳Box-Jenkins季节模型的确定

Muammar Attaee, Sabah F. H. Alhamdi, Firas J. kadhim, Musab S. Al-Bayati
{"title":"贝克梅大坝最佳Box-Jenkins季节模型的确定","authors":"Muammar Attaee, Sabah F. H. Alhamdi, Firas J. kadhim, Musab S. Al-Bayati","doi":"10.61263/mjes.v1i2.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prediction of water inflow to a reservoir is of great interest in the policy of the reservoir operation throughout the year. When significant amounts of inflow series entering to the reservoir are nondeterministic events, the utilization of stochastic models to check the reliability of the recorded data and forecast the future events become preferable. One of the most powerful and widely used methodology for forecasting time series is the class of models called the Box-Jenkins models. In this study, time series analysis was applied to records of 69 monthly mean inflows to Bekhme reservoir, in the northern part of Iraq, for the water year period from 1933 to 2006. Nine multiplicative seasonal models were fitted to this series; these were the seasonal autoregressive integrated (SARI) (1, 1, 0) × (1, 1, 0)12, (2, 1, 0) × (1, 1, 0)12, and (1, 1, 0) × (2, 1, 0)12 models, the seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) (1, 1, 1) × (1, 1, 1)12, (2, 1, 2) × (1, 1, 1)12, and (1, 1, 1) × (2, 1, 2)12 models, and the seasonal integrated moving average (SIMA) (0, 1, 1) × (0, 1, 1)12, (0, 1, 2) × (0, 1, 1)12, and (0, 1, 1) × (0, 1, 2)12 models. The unconditional sum of squares method was used to estimate the parameters of the models and to compute the sum of squared errors for each one. It was found that the best model which corresponded to the minimum sum of squared errors was the SIMA (0, 1, 1) × (0, 1, 1)12 model. The estimated moving average parameters of this model were 0.378 and 0.953 for both θ and Θ respectively. The adequacy of this model was checked by plotting the normalized cumulative periodogram which does not indicate nonrandomness of the residuals. Forecasts of monthly inflow for the period from October, 2002, to September, 2006 were graphically compared with observed inflow for the same period and since agreement was very precise, adequacy of the selected model was confirmed.","PeriodicalId":253933,"journal":{"name":"Misan Journal of Engineering Sciences","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of The Best Box-Jenkins’ Seasonal Model to Inflows of Reservoir of Bekhme Dam\",\"authors\":\"Muammar Attaee, Sabah F. H. Alhamdi, Firas J. kadhim, Musab S. Al-Bayati\",\"doi\":\"10.61263/mjes.v1i2.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prediction of water inflow to a reservoir is of great interest in the policy of the reservoir operation throughout the year. When significant amounts of inflow series entering to the reservoir are nondeterministic events, the utilization of stochastic models to check the reliability of the recorded data and forecast the future events become preferable. One of the most powerful and widely used methodology for forecasting time series is the class of models called the Box-Jenkins models. In this study, time series analysis was applied to records of 69 monthly mean inflows to Bekhme reservoir, in the northern part of Iraq, for the water year period from 1933 to 2006. Nine multiplicative seasonal models were fitted to this series; these were the seasonal autoregressive integrated (SARI) (1, 1, 0) × (1, 1, 0)12, (2, 1, 0) × (1, 1, 0)12, and (1, 1, 0) × (2, 1, 0)12 models, the seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) (1, 1, 1) × (1, 1, 1)12, (2, 1, 2) × (1, 1, 1)12, and (1, 1, 1) × (2, 1, 2)12 models, and the seasonal integrated moving average (SIMA) (0, 1, 1) × (0, 1, 1)12, (0, 1, 2) × (0, 1, 1)12, and (0, 1, 1) × (0, 1, 2)12 models. The unconditional sum of squares method was used to estimate the parameters of the models and to compute the sum of squared errors for each one. It was found that the best model which corresponded to the minimum sum of squared errors was the SIMA (0, 1, 1) × (0, 1, 1)12 model. The estimated moving average parameters of this model were 0.378 and 0.953 for both θ and Θ respectively. The adequacy of this model was checked by plotting the normalized cumulative periodogram which does not indicate nonrandomness of the residuals. Forecasts of monthly inflow for the period from October, 2002, to September, 2006 were graphically compared with observed inflow for the same period and since agreement was very precise, adequacy of the selected model was confirmed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Misan Journal of Engineering Sciences\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Misan Journal of Engineering Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61263/mjes.v1i2.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Misan Journal of Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61263/mjes.v1i2.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水库入水量的预测对水库全年的运行政策具有重要意义。当大量进入水库的流入序列是不确定事件时,利用随机模型来检查记录数据的可靠性并预测未来事件是可取的。预测时间序列最强大和最广泛使用的方法之一是被称为Box-Jenkins模型的一类模型。本研究对1933 - 2006年水年期间伊拉克北部Bekhme水库69个月平均流入记录进行了时间序列分析。该系列拟合了9个乘法季节模型;这是季节性自回归综合(纱丽)(1 1 0)×(1 1 0)12日(2 1 0)×12(1 1 0),和(1 1 0)×(2,1,0)12模型、季节性自回归综合移动平均(SARIMA)(1, 1, 1)×12(1,1,1),(2,1,2)×(1,1,1)12日,(1,1,1)×(2,1,2)12模型,和季节性集成移动平均(硅镁层)(0,1,1)×(0,1,1)12日(0,1,2)×(0,1,1)12日和(0,1,1)×(0,1,2)12模型。采用无条件平方和法估计模型参数,并计算各模型的误差平方和。结果表明,误差平方和最小的最佳模型是SIMA (0,1,1) ×(0,1,1)12模型。对于θ和Θ,模型估计的移动平均参数分别为0.378和0.953。通过绘制归一化累积周期图来检验该模型的充分性,该周期图不显示残差的非随机性。我们将2002年10月至2006年9月期间的每月流入预测与同期的实际流入进行了图形比较,由于两者的一致性非常精确,因此所选模型的充分性得到了证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination of The Best Box-Jenkins’ Seasonal Model to Inflows of Reservoir of Bekhme Dam
Prediction of water inflow to a reservoir is of great interest in the policy of the reservoir operation throughout the year. When significant amounts of inflow series entering to the reservoir are nondeterministic events, the utilization of stochastic models to check the reliability of the recorded data and forecast the future events become preferable. One of the most powerful and widely used methodology for forecasting time series is the class of models called the Box-Jenkins models. In this study, time series analysis was applied to records of 69 monthly mean inflows to Bekhme reservoir, in the northern part of Iraq, for the water year period from 1933 to 2006. Nine multiplicative seasonal models were fitted to this series; these were the seasonal autoregressive integrated (SARI) (1, 1, 0) × (1, 1, 0)12, (2, 1, 0) × (1, 1, 0)12, and (1, 1, 0) × (2, 1, 0)12 models, the seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) (1, 1, 1) × (1, 1, 1)12, (2, 1, 2) × (1, 1, 1)12, and (1, 1, 1) × (2, 1, 2)12 models, and the seasonal integrated moving average (SIMA) (0, 1, 1) × (0, 1, 1)12, (0, 1, 2) × (0, 1, 1)12, and (0, 1, 1) × (0, 1, 2)12 models. The unconditional sum of squares method was used to estimate the parameters of the models and to compute the sum of squared errors for each one. It was found that the best model which corresponded to the minimum sum of squared errors was the SIMA (0, 1, 1) × (0, 1, 1)12 model. The estimated moving average parameters of this model were 0.378 and 0.953 for both θ and Θ respectively. The adequacy of this model was checked by plotting the normalized cumulative periodogram which does not indicate nonrandomness of the residuals. Forecasts of monthly inflow for the period from October, 2002, to September, 2006 were graphically compared with observed inflow for the same period and since agreement was very precise, adequacy of the selected model was confirmed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信