死亡医疗援助:加拿大护士和护理的一个政治问题。

D. Banner, Catharine J. Schiller, Shannon Freeman
{"title":"死亡医疗援助:加拿大护士和护理的一个政治问题。","authors":"D. Banner, Catharine J. Schiller, Shannon Freeman","doi":"10.1111/nup.12281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Death and dying are natural phenomena embedded within complex political, cultural and social systems. Nurses often practice at the forefront of this process and have a fundamental role in caring for both patients and those close to them during the process of dying and following death. While nursing has a rich tradition in advancing the palliative and end-of-life care movement, new modes of care for patients with serious and irremediable medical conditions arise when assisted death is legalized in a particular jurisdiction. In early 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada released its landmark decision Carter v. Canada (Attorney General) ('Carter'), which legalized physician-assisted suicide in particular clinical situations. The new law provided the broad national framework for Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) in Canada but, once the law was passed, provincial and territorial governments and health professional regulatory bodies each had to undertake a process of developing policies, procedures and processes to guide MAiD-related practice specific to their jurisdiction. In this paper, we begin to examine the political ramifications and professional tensions arising from MAiD for nurses and nursing, focusing specifically upon the impacts for registered nurses. We identify how variations in the provincial and territorial literature and regulatory guidelines across Canada have given rise to role confusion and uncertainty among some registered nurses and how this may potentially impact patient care. We then continue to highlight the need for greater political activism among nurses to foster greater clarity in nursing roles in MAiD and to advocate for improved supports for patients and those close to them.","PeriodicalId":391694,"journal":{"name":"Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical assistance in dying: A political issue for nurses and nursing in Canada.\",\"authors\":\"D. Banner, Catharine J. Schiller, Shannon Freeman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nup.12281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Death and dying are natural phenomena embedded within complex political, cultural and social systems. Nurses often practice at the forefront of this process and have a fundamental role in caring for both patients and those close to them during the process of dying and following death. While nursing has a rich tradition in advancing the palliative and end-of-life care movement, new modes of care for patients with serious and irremediable medical conditions arise when assisted death is legalized in a particular jurisdiction. In early 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada released its landmark decision Carter v. Canada (Attorney General) ('Carter'), which legalized physician-assisted suicide in particular clinical situations. The new law provided the broad national framework for Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) in Canada but, once the law was passed, provincial and territorial governments and health professional regulatory bodies each had to undertake a process of developing policies, procedures and processes to guide MAiD-related practice specific to their jurisdiction. In this paper, we begin to examine the political ramifications and professional tensions arising from MAiD for nurses and nursing, focusing specifically upon the impacts for registered nurses. We identify how variations in the provincial and territorial literature and regulatory guidelines across Canada have given rise to role confusion and uncertainty among some registered nurses and how this may potentially impact patient care. We then continue to highlight the need for greater political activism among nurses to foster greater clarity in nursing roles in MAiD and to advocate for improved supports for patients and those close to them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":391694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

死亡和临终是嵌入在复杂的政治、文化和社会系统中的自然现象。护士经常在这一过程的最前沿进行实践,在病人和他们在死亡过程中以及死亡后的亲近者的护理中发挥着重要作用。虽然护理在推进姑息治疗和临终关怀运动方面具有丰富的传统,但当协助死亡在特定司法管辖区合法化时,就会出现对严重和无法补救的医疗状况患者的新护理模式。2015年初,加拿大最高法院发布了具有里程碑意义的卡特诉加拿大(总检察长)案(“卡特”)判决,该判决使医生在特定临床情况下协助自杀合法化。新的法律为加拿大临终医疗援助提供了广泛的国家框架,但是,一旦法律通过,各省和地区政府以及卫生专业管理机构都必须开展制定政策、程序和程序的进程,以指导其管辖范围内与临终医疗援助有关的具体做法。在本文中,我们开始研究女佣对护士和护理产生的政治后果和专业紧张关系,特别关注对注册护士的影响。我们确定了加拿大各省和地区文献和监管指南的差异如何在一些注册护士中引起角色混淆和不确定性,以及这可能如何影响患者护理。然后,我们继续强调需要在护士中进行更大的政治活动,以促进MAiD中护理角色的更明确,并倡导改善对患者及其亲近者的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medical assistance in dying: A political issue for nurses and nursing in Canada.
Death and dying are natural phenomena embedded within complex political, cultural and social systems. Nurses often practice at the forefront of this process and have a fundamental role in caring for both patients and those close to them during the process of dying and following death. While nursing has a rich tradition in advancing the palliative and end-of-life care movement, new modes of care for patients with serious and irremediable medical conditions arise when assisted death is legalized in a particular jurisdiction. In early 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada released its landmark decision Carter v. Canada (Attorney General) ('Carter'), which legalized physician-assisted suicide in particular clinical situations. The new law provided the broad national framework for Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) in Canada but, once the law was passed, provincial and territorial governments and health professional regulatory bodies each had to undertake a process of developing policies, procedures and processes to guide MAiD-related practice specific to their jurisdiction. In this paper, we begin to examine the political ramifications and professional tensions arising from MAiD for nurses and nursing, focusing specifically upon the impacts for registered nurses. We identify how variations in the provincial and territorial literature and regulatory guidelines across Canada have given rise to role confusion and uncertainty among some registered nurses and how this may potentially impact patient care. We then continue to highlight the need for greater political activism among nurses to foster greater clarity in nursing roles in MAiD and to advocate for improved supports for patients and those close to them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信