成功的提案准备

M. Crow
{"title":"成功的提案准备","authors":"M. Crow","doi":"10.1109/PESW.2001.916987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the biggest mistakes that an investigator can make is to be vague about their proposed contribution. The project objectives are the single, most important part of the proposal. Many investigators fail to state the project objectives clearly. This forces the reviewers to infer from the overall project description what the contributions of the project will be. This is not a good approach. The reviewer may infer incorrectly what the intended contributions will be, or may give the various aspects of the project different merit weighings than the investigator intends. Both of these may potentially lead to lower ratings. Many reviewers will subconsciously make a determination about their funding recommendation within reading the first couple of pages of the proposal. They will then use the remainder of the proposal to build their argument to support their recommendation. Therefore it is critical to be clear and concise about the intended obj ectives of the project.","PeriodicalId":253534,"journal":{"name":"2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37194)","volume":"149 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Successful proposal preparation\",\"authors\":\"M. Crow\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PESW.2001.916987\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the biggest mistakes that an investigator can make is to be vague about their proposed contribution. The project objectives are the single, most important part of the proposal. Many investigators fail to state the project objectives clearly. This forces the reviewers to infer from the overall project description what the contributions of the project will be. This is not a good approach. The reviewer may infer incorrectly what the intended contributions will be, or may give the various aspects of the project different merit weighings than the investigator intends. Both of these may potentially lead to lower ratings. Many reviewers will subconsciously make a determination about their funding recommendation within reading the first couple of pages of the proposal. They will then use the remainder of the proposal to build their argument to support their recommendation. Therefore it is critical to be clear and concise about the intended obj ectives of the project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37194)\",\"volume\":\"149 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37194)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PESW.2001.916987\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37194)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PESW.2001.916987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究者可能犯的最大错误之一就是对他们提出的贡献含糊其辞。项目目标是建议书中最重要的部分。许多研究者没有清楚地陈述项目目标。这迫使审稿人从整个项目描述中推断出项目的贡献是什么。这不是一个好方法。审稿人可能会错误地推断出预期的贡献是什么,或者可能会给项目的各个方面不同的价值权重,而不是研究者想要的。这两种情况都可能导致评级下降。许多审稿人会在阅读提案的前几页时下意识地决定他们的资助建议。然后,他们将使用提案的其余部分来建立他们的论点,以支持他们的建议。因此,对项目的预期目标保持清晰和简洁是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Successful proposal preparation
One of the biggest mistakes that an investigator can make is to be vague about their proposed contribution. The project objectives are the single, most important part of the proposal. Many investigators fail to state the project objectives clearly. This forces the reviewers to infer from the overall project description what the contributions of the project will be. This is not a good approach. The reviewer may infer incorrectly what the intended contributions will be, or may give the various aspects of the project different merit weighings than the investigator intends. Both of these may potentially lead to lower ratings. Many reviewers will subconsciously make a determination about their funding recommendation within reading the first couple of pages of the proposal. They will then use the remainder of the proposal to build their argument to support their recommendation. Therefore it is critical to be clear and concise about the intended obj ectives of the project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信