弹性网络中的风险缓解

P. Chołda, Piotr Guzik, Krzysztof Rusek
{"title":"弹性网络中的风险缓解","authors":"P. Chołda, Piotr Guzik, Krzysztof Rusek","doi":"10.1109/RNDM.2014.7014927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article proposes shifting the perspective for the design of resilient networks from cost-focused to one suited for business purposes. Risk engineering is used as a basis to enable us to monetarily express not only the cost of recovery, but also the impact of failures affecting connections (expressed with use of penalties imposed on an operator), and then to find the tradeoff between the cost of the assigned recovery methods and the improved level of resilience. During risk assessment, monetary quantification of penalties is applied with compensation policies, and business relevant risk measures are used. Then, risk response selection is based on various risk mitigation strategies (involving profit maximization, total benefit coverage, cost balance, and risk minimization) proposed in the security risk management. Looking for the cost-risk trade-off related to the assumed mitigation strategy is a complex optimization problem that cannot be modeled with deterministic linear programming. Therefore, to be able to choose recovery options, we develop a genetic algorithm. The results show diversity of recovery procedures selected for various selected mitigation strategies.","PeriodicalId":299072,"journal":{"name":"2014 6th International Workshop on Reliable Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk mitigation in resilient networks\",\"authors\":\"P. Chołda, Piotr Guzik, Krzysztof Rusek\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RNDM.2014.7014927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article proposes shifting the perspective for the design of resilient networks from cost-focused to one suited for business purposes. Risk engineering is used as a basis to enable us to monetarily express not only the cost of recovery, but also the impact of failures affecting connections (expressed with use of penalties imposed on an operator), and then to find the tradeoff between the cost of the assigned recovery methods and the improved level of resilience. During risk assessment, monetary quantification of penalties is applied with compensation policies, and business relevant risk measures are used. Then, risk response selection is based on various risk mitigation strategies (involving profit maximization, total benefit coverage, cost balance, and risk minimization) proposed in the security risk management. Looking for the cost-risk trade-off related to the assumed mitigation strategy is a complex optimization problem that cannot be modeled with deterministic linear programming. Therefore, to be able to choose recovery options, we develop a genetic algorithm. The results show diversity of recovery procedures selected for various selected mitigation strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 6th International Workshop on Reliable Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 6th International Workshop on Reliable Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RNDM.2014.7014927\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 6th International Workshop on Reliable Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RNDM.2014.7014927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文建议将弹性网络的设计角度从以成本为中心转变为适合商业目的的角度。风险工程被用作基础,使我们不仅可以用货币表示恢复的成本,还可以表示影响连接的故障的影响(使用对操作人员施加的处罚来表示),然后找到分配的恢复方法的成本和改进的弹性水平之间的权衡。在风险评估过程中,将货币量化处罚与补偿政策一起应用,并使用与业务相关的风险度量。然后,根据安全风险管理中提出的各种风险缓解策略(包括利润最大化、总收益覆盖、成本平衡和风险最小化)进行风险应对选择。寻找与假设的缓解策略相关的成本风险权衡是一个复杂的优化问题,无法用确定性线性规划建模。因此,为了能够选择恢复选项,我们开发了一种遗传算法。结果表明,为各种选定的缓解策略所选择的恢复程序存在多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk mitigation in resilient networks
This article proposes shifting the perspective for the design of resilient networks from cost-focused to one suited for business purposes. Risk engineering is used as a basis to enable us to monetarily express not only the cost of recovery, but also the impact of failures affecting connections (expressed with use of penalties imposed on an operator), and then to find the tradeoff between the cost of the assigned recovery methods and the improved level of resilience. During risk assessment, monetary quantification of penalties is applied with compensation policies, and business relevant risk measures are used. Then, risk response selection is based on various risk mitigation strategies (involving profit maximization, total benefit coverage, cost balance, and risk minimization) proposed in the security risk management. Looking for the cost-risk trade-off related to the assumed mitigation strategy is a complex optimization problem that cannot be modeled with deterministic linear programming. Therefore, to be able to choose recovery options, we develop a genetic algorithm. The results show diversity of recovery procedures selected for various selected mitigation strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信