社会保障与财富不平等趋势

S. Catherine, Max Miller, Natasha Sarin
{"title":"社会保障与财富不平等趋势","authors":"S. Catherine, Max Miller, Natasha Sarin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3546668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent influential work finds large increases in inequality in the U.S., based on measures of wealth concentration that notably exclude the value of social insurance programs. This paper revisits this conclusion by incorporating Social Security retirement benefits into measures of wealth inequality. Wealth inequality has not increased in the last three decades when Social Security is accounted for. This finding is robust to assumptions about how taxes and benefits may change in response to system financing concerns. When discounted at the risk-free rate, real Social Security wealth increased substantially from $4.8 trillion in 1989 to just over $41.3 trillion in 2016. When we adjust for systematic risk coming from the covariance of Social Security returns with the market portfolio, this increase remains sizable, growing from over $3.9 trillion in 1989 to $33.9 trillion in 2016. Consequently, by 2016, Social Security wealth represented 57% of the wealth of the bottom 90% of the wealth distribution. We conclude that Social Security represents the main source of savings for most Americans. Measures of inequality that exclude it are misleading.","PeriodicalId":377417,"journal":{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Security and Trends in Wealth Inequality\",\"authors\":\"S. Catherine, Max Miller, Natasha Sarin\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3546668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent influential work finds large increases in inequality in the U.S., based on measures of wealth concentration that notably exclude the value of social insurance programs. This paper revisits this conclusion by incorporating Social Security retirement benefits into measures of wealth inequality. Wealth inequality has not increased in the last three decades when Social Security is accounted for. This finding is robust to assumptions about how taxes and benefits may change in response to system financing concerns. When discounted at the risk-free rate, real Social Security wealth increased substantially from $4.8 trillion in 1989 to just over $41.3 trillion in 2016. When we adjust for systematic risk coming from the covariance of Social Security returns with the market portfolio, this increase remains sizable, growing from over $3.9 trillion in 1989 to $33.9 trillion in 2016. Consequently, by 2016, Social Security wealth represented 57% of the wealth of the bottom 90% of the wealth distribution. We conclude that Social Security represents the main source of savings for most Americans. Measures of inequality that exclude it are misleading.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3546668\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3546668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

最近有影响力的研究发现,美国的不平等现象大幅加剧,这是基于对财富集中程度的衡量,明显排除了社会保险项目的价值。本文通过将社会保障退休福利纳入财富不平等的衡量标准,重新审视了这一结论。在过去的30年里,如果把社会保障考虑在内,财富不平等并没有增加。这一发现有力地反驳了有关税收和福利如何随着系统融资问题而变化的假设。如果按无风险利率贴现,实际社会保障财富从1989年的4.8万亿美元大幅增加到2016年的略高于41.3万亿美元。当我们调整来自社会保障回报与市场投资组合协方差的系统风险时,这一增长仍然相当可观,从1989年的逾3.9万亿美元增长到2016年的33.9万亿美元。因此,到2016年,社会保障财富占财富分配底部90%人群财富的57%。我们的结论是,社会保障代表了大多数美国人储蓄的主要来源。将其排除在外的不平等衡量方法具有误导性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Security and Trends in Wealth Inequality
Recent influential work finds large increases in inequality in the U.S., based on measures of wealth concentration that notably exclude the value of social insurance programs. This paper revisits this conclusion by incorporating Social Security retirement benefits into measures of wealth inequality. Wealth inequality has not increased in the last three decades when Social Security is accounted for. This finding is robust to assumptions about how taxes and benefits may change in response to system financing concerns. When discounted at the risk-free rate, real Social Security wealth increased substantially from $4.8 trillion in 1989 to just over $41.3 trillion in 2016. When we adjust for systematic risk coming from the covariance of Social Security returns with the market portfolio, this increase remains sizable, growing from over $3.9 trillion in 1989 to $33.9 trillion in 2016. Consequently, by 2016, Social Security wealth represented 57% of the wealth of the bottom 90% of the wealth distribution. We conclude that Social Security represents the main source of savings for most Americans. Measures of inequality that exclude it are misleading.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信