培养批判性思维、创造力和创新能力

B. Shoop
{"title":"培养批判性思维、创造力和创新能力","authors":"B. Shoop","doi":"10.1109/INNOTEK.2014.6877362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A desirable goal of engineering education is to teach students how to think critically and be creative and innovative. However, the speed of technological innovation and the continual expansion of disciplinary knowledge leave little time in the curriculum for students to formally study innovation, particularly at the undergraduate level. At West Point we have developed a novel upper-division interdisciplinary undergraduate engineering course that simultaneously develops the critical thinking, creativity and innovation of our students. This course is structured as a deliberate interactive engagement between students and faculty that employs the Socratic Method to develop an understanding of disruptive and innovative technologies and a historical context of how social, cultural, and religious factors impact the acceptance or rejection of innovation. The course begins by developing the background understanding of what disruptive technology is and a historical context about successes and failures of social, cultural, and religious acceptance of technological innovation. To develop this framework, students read The Innovator's Dilemma by Clayton M. Christensen, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. Kuhn, The Discoverers by Daniel J. Boorstin, and The Two Cultures by C.P. Snow. For each class meeting, students also read current scientific and technical literature and come prepared to discuss current events related to technological innovation. Each student researches potential disruptive technologies and prepares a compelling argument of why the specific technologies are disruptive so they can defend their choice and rationale. During course meetings students discuss the readings and specific technologies found during their independent research. As part of this research, each student has the opportunity to interview forward thinking technology leaders in their respective fields of interest.","PeriodicalId":217120,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Innovations in Technology Conference","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing critical thinking, creativity and innovation skills\",\"authors\":\"B. Shoop\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INNOTEK.2014.6877362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A desirable goal of engineering education is to teach students how to think critically and be creative and innovative. However, the speed of technological innovation and the continual expansion of disciplinary knowledge leave little time in the curriculum for students to formally study innovation, particularly at the undergraduate level. At West Point we have developed a novel upper-division interdisciplinary undergraduate engineering course that simultaneously develops the critical thinking, creativity and innovation of our students. This course is structured as a deliberate interactive engagement between students and faculty that employs the Socratic Method to develop an understanding of disruptive and innovative technologies and a historical context of how social, cultural, and religious factors impact the acceptance or rejection of innovation. The course begins by developing the background understanding of what disruptive technology is and a historical context about successes and failures of social, cultural, and religious acceptance of technological innovation. To develop this framework, students read The Innovator's Dilemma by Clayton M. Christensen, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. Kuhn, The Discoverers by Daniel J. Boorstin, and The Two Cultures by C.P. Snow. For each class meeting, students also read current scientific and technical literature and come prepared to discuss current events related to technological innovation. Each student researches potential disruptive technologies and prepares a compelling argument of why the specific technologies are disruptive so they can defend their choice and rationale. During course meetings students discuss the readings and specific technologies found during their independent research. As part of this research, each student has the opportunity to interview forward thinking technology leaders in their respective fields of interest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":217120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE Innovations in Technology Conference\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE Innovations in Technology Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INNOTEK.2014.6877362\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE Innovations in Technology Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INNOTEK.2014.6877362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

工程教育的理想目标是教会学生如何批判性地思考,具有创造性和创新性。然而,技术创新的速度和学科知识的不断扩展,使得学生在课程中几乎没有时间来正式学习创新,尤其是在本科阶段。在西点军校,我们开设了一门新颖的高年级跨学科本科工程课程,同时培养学生的批判性思维、创造力和创新能力。本课程的结构是学生和教师之间有意识的互动,采用苏格拉底方法来理解破坏性和创新技术,以及社会、文化和宗教因素如何影响接受或拒绝创新的历史背景。本课程首先发展对颠覆性技术的背景理解,以及对技术创新的社会、文化和宗教接受的成功与失败的历史背景。为了发展这个框架,学生们阅读了克莱顿·m·克里斯滕森的《创新者的困境》、托马斯·s·库恩的《科学革命的结构》、丹尼尔·j·布尔斯廷的《发现者》和C.P.斯诺的《两种文化》。在每次班会中,学生们还要阅读当前的科学技术文献,并准备好讨论与技术创新相关的当前事件。每个学生都研究潜在的颠覆性技术,并准备一个令人信服的论点,说明为什么特定的技术是颠覆性的,这样他们就可以为自己的选择和理由辩护。在课程会议上,学生讨论他们在独立研究中发现的阅读材料和具体技术。作为这项研究的一部分,每个学生都有机会在各自感兴趣的领域采访具有前瞻性思维的技术领导者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing critical thinking, creativity and innovation skills
A desirable goal of engineering education is to teach students how to think critically and be creative and innovative. However, the speed of technological innovation and the continual expansion of disciplinary knowledge leave little time in the curriculum for students to formally study innovation, particularly at the undergraduate level. At West Point we have developed a novel upper-division interdisciplinary undergraduate engineering course that simultaneously develops the critical thinking, creativity and innovation of our students. This course is structured as a deliberate interactive engagement between students and faculty that employs the Socratic Method to develop an understanding of disruptive and innovative technologies and a historical context of how social, cultural, and religious factors impact the acceptance or rejection of innovation. The course begins by developing the background understanding of what disruptive technology is and a historical context about successes and failures of social, cultural, and religious acceptance of technological innovation. To develop this framework, students read The Innovator's Dilemma by Clayton M. Christensen, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. Kuhn, The Discoverers by Daniel J. Boorstin, and The Two Cultures by C.P. Snow. For each class meeting, students also read current scientific and technical literature and come prepared to discuss current events related to technological innovation. Each student researches potential disruptive technologies and prepares a compelling argument of why the specific technologies are disruptive so they can defend their choice and rationale. During course meetings students discuss the readings and specific technologies found during their independent research. As part of this research, each student has the opportunity to interview forward thinking technology leaders in their respective fields of interest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信