摄影的遗传学观点:你如何创造图像?

Marcelo Juchem
{"title":"摄影的遗传学观点:你如何创造图像?","authors":"Marcelo Juchem","doi":"10.21726/RCC.V9I1.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Literature and photography have a lot in common to records, identities and memories. Discussing these creative practices is, many times, hard and a little precise task, as it happens in artistic debate. For that matter, this work aims to reflect on the process of photography creation through the genetic criticism, a methodological approach that gained ground in literature in the 1960’s that intends to clarify the meanderings of the creative process considering documents of the process. Observing the photographic act as a process, the debate about authorship is expanded, refuting Bresson’s decisive moment. In this work, Tiago Santana and Audálio Dantas’ photobook O chão de Graciliano, from 2006, was analyzed regarding the geneticist perspective, which was proven to be quite adequate to debate and to preserve the photographic creative process.","PeriodicalId":436286,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana De Computacion \\/ Colombian Journal of Computation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Um olhar geneticista para a fotografia: como se criam imagens?\",\"authors\":\"Marcelo Juchem\",\"doi\":\"10.21726/RCC.V9I1.121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Literature and photography have a lot in common to records, identities and memories. Discussing these creative practices is, many times, hard and a little precise task, as it happens in artistic debate. For that matter, this work aims to reflect on the process of photography creation through the genetic criticism, a methodological approach that gained ground in literature in the 1960’s that intends to clarify the meanderings of the creative process considering documents of the process. Observing the photographic act as a process, the debate about authorship is expanded, refuting Bresson’s decisive moment. In this work, Tiago Santana and Audálio Dantas’ photobook O chão de Graciliano, from 2006, was analyzed regarding the geneticist perspective, which was proven to be quite adequate to debate and to preserve the photographic creative process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Colombiana De Computacion \\\\/ Colombian Journal of Computation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Colombiana De Computacion \\\\/ Colombian Journal of Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21726/RCC.V9I1.121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana De Computacion \\/ Colombian Journal of Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21726/RCC.V9I1.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文学和摄影在记录、身份和记忆方面有很多共同之处。很多时候,讨论这些创造性的实践是一项艰难而又有点精确的任务,就像在艺术辩论中发生的那样。就此而言,这项工作旨在通过遗传批评来反思摄影创作的过程,遗传批评是一种方法论方法,在20世纪60年代的文学中获得了一席之地,旨在阐明创作过程的曲折,并考虑到过程的文件。将摄影作为一个过程来观察,关于作者身份的争论扩大了,驳斥了布列松的决定性时刻。在这项工作中,Tiago Santana和Audálio Dantas从2006年开始的摄影集O ch O de Graciliano从遗传学的角度进行了分析,这被证明是相当足够的辩论和保护摄影创作过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Um olhar geneticista para a fotografia: como se criam imagens?
Literature and photography have a lot in common to records, identities and memories. Discussing these creative practices is, many times, hard and a little precise task, as it happens in artistic debate. For that matter, this work aims to reflect on the process of photography creation through the genetic criticism, a methodological approach that gained ground in literature in the 1960’s that intends to clarify the meanderings of the creative process considering documents of the process. Observing the photographic act as a process, the debate about authorship is expanded, refuting Bresson’s decisive moment. In this work, Tiago Santana and Audálio Dantas’ photobook O chão de Graciliano, from 2006, was analyzed regarding the geneticist perspective, which was proven to be quite adequate to debate and to preserve the photographic creative process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信