中文垃圾邮件过滤中特征选择的比较研究

Yan Xu
{"title":"中文垃圾邮件过滤中特征选择的比较研究","authors":"Yan Xu","doi":"10.1109/ICAICT.2012.6398481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feature selection plays an important role in Spam Filtering. Automatic feature selection methods such as document frequency thresholding (DF), information gain (IG), and so on are commonly applied in spam filtering. Spam filtering can also be seen as a special two-class text categorization (TC) problem. Many existing experiments show IG is one of the most effective methods in text categorization task. However, what is the most effective method on spam filtering? As we all know there was not a systematic research about these feature selection methods on spam filtering. This paper is a comparative study of feature selection methods in spam filtering. The focus is on aggressive dimensionality reduction. We explore 2 classifiers (Naïve Bayes and SVM), and run our experiments on Chinese-spam collection. Six methods were evaluated, including term selection based on document frequency (DF), information gain(IG), χ2 feature selection method, expected cross entropy (ECE), the weight of evidence for text (WET) and odds ratio (ODD). We found ODD and WET most effective in our experiments. In contrast, IG and χ2 had relatively poor performance due to their bias towards favoring rare terms, and its sensitivity to probability estimation errors.","PeriodicalId":221511,"journal":{"name":"2012 6th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study on feature selection in Chinese Spam Filtering\",\"authors\":\"Yan Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICAICT.2012.6398481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Feature selection plays an important role in Spam Filtering. Automatic feature selection methods such as document frequency thresholding (DF), information gain (IG), and so on are commonly applied in spam filtering. Spam filtering can also be seen as a special two-class text categorization (TC) problem. Many existing experiments show IG is one of the most effective methods in text categorization task. However, what is the most effective method on spam filtering? As we all know there was not a systematic research about these feature selection methods on spam filtering. This paper is a comparative study of feature selection methods in spam filtering. The focus is on aggressive dimensionality reduction. We explore 2 classifiers (Naïve Bayes and SVM), and run our experiments on Chinese-spam collection. Six methods were evaluated, including term selection based on document frequency (DF), information gain(IG), χ2 feature selection method, expected cross entropy (ECE), the weight of evidence for text (WET) and odds ratio (ODD). We found ODD and WET most effective in our experiments. In contrast, IG and χ2 had relatively poor performance due to their bias towards favoring rare terms, and its sensitivity to probability estimation errors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":221511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 6th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 6th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAICT.2012.6398481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 6th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAICT.2012.6398481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

特征选择在垃圾邮件过滤中起着重要的作用。自动特征选择方法,如文档频率阈值(DF)、信息增益(IG)等,是垃圾邮件过滤中常用的方法。垃圾邮件过滤也可以看作是一个特殊的两类文本分类(TC)问题。许多实验表明,IG是文本分类任务中最有效的方法之一。然而,什么是过滤垃圾邮件最有效的方法?众所周知,这些特征选择方法在垃圾邮件过滤方面还没有系统的研究。本文对垃圾邮件过滤中的特征选择方法进行了比较研究。重点是积极的降维。我们探索了两种分类器(Naïve贝叶斯和支持向量机),并在中文垃圾邮件收集上运行了我们的实验。评估了六种方法,包括基于文档频率(DF)、信息增益(IG)、χ2特征选择方法、期望交叉熵(ECE)、文本证据权(WET)和优势比(ODD)的术语选择方法。我们在实验中发现ODD和WET是最有效的。相比之下,IG和χ2的表现相对较差,因为它们倾向于支持稀有项,并且对概率估计误差很敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study on feature selection in Chinese Spam Filtering
Feature selection plays an important role in Spam Filtering. Automatic feature selection methods such as document frequency thresholding (DF), information gain (IG), and so on are commonly applied in spam filtering. Spam filtering can also be seen as a special two-class text categorization (TC) problem. Many existing experiments show IG is one of the most effective methods in text categorization task. However, what is the most effective method on spam filtering? As we all know there was not a systematic research about these feature selection methods on spam filtering. This paper is a comparative study of feature selection methods in spam filtering. The focus is on aggressive dimensionality reduction. We explore 2 classifiers (Naïve Bayes and SVM), and run our experiments on Chinese-spam collection. Six methods were evaluated, including term selection based on document frequency (DF), information gain(IG), χ2 feature selection method, expected cross entropy (ECE), the weight of evidence for text (WET) and odds ratio (ODD). We found ODD and WET most effective in our experiments. In contrast, IG and χ2 had relatively poor performance due to their bias towards favoring rare terms, and its sensitivity to probability estimation errors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信