AliAkbar Sadeghi, Farzane Aminmansour, H. Shahriari
{"title":"矮人弗兰肯斯坦仍然在你的记忆中:微小的代码重用攻击","authors":"AliAkbar Sadeghi, Farzane Aminmansour, H. Shahriari","doi":"10.22042/ISECURE.2017.0.0.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Code reuse attacks such as return oriented programming and jump oriented programming are the most popular exploitation methods among attackers. A large number of practical and non-practical defenses are proposed that differ in their overhead, the source code requirement, detection rate and implementation dependencies. However, a usual aspect among these methods is consideration of the common behaviour of code reuse attacks, which is the construction of a gadget chain. Therefore, the implication of a gadget and the minimum size of an attack chain are a matter of controversy. Conservative or relaxed thresholds may cause false positive and false negative alarms, respectively. The main contribution of this paper is to provide a tricky aspect of code reuse techniques, called tiny code reuse attacks (Tiny-CRA) that demonstrates the ineffectiveness of the threshold based detection methods. We show that with bare minimum assumptions, Tiny-CRA can reduce the size of a gadget chain in shuch a way that no distinction can be detected between normal behavior of a program and a code-reuse execution. To do so, we exhibit our Tiny-CRA primitives and introduce a useful gadget set available in libc. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by implementing nine different shell-codes and exploiting real-world buffer overflow vulnerability in HT Editor 2.0.20.","PeriodicalId":436674,"journal":{"name":"ISC Int. J. Inf. Secur.","volume":"201 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dwarf Frankenstein is still in your memory: tiny code reuse attacks\",\"authors\":\"AliAkbar Sadeghi, Farzane Aminmansour, H. Shahriari\",\"doi\":\"10.22042/ISECURE.2017.0.0.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Code reuse attacks such as return oriented programming and jump oriented programming are the most popular exploitation methods among attackers. A large number of practical and non-practical defenses are proposed that differ in their overhead, the source code requirement, detection rate and implementation dependencies. However, a usual aspect among these methods is consideration of the common behaviour of code reuse attacks, which is the construction of a gadget chain. Therefore, the implication of a gadget and the minimum size of an attack chain are a matter of controversy. Conservative or relaxed thresholds may cause false positive and false negative alarms, respectively. The main contribution of this paper is to provide a tricky aspect of code reuse techniques, called tiny code reuse attacks (Tiny-CRA) that demonstrates the ineffectiveness of the threshold based detection methods. We show that with bare minimum assumptions, Tiny-CRA can reduce the size of a gadget chain in shuch a way that no distinction can be detected between normal behavior of a program and a code-reuse execution. To do so, we exhibit our Tiny-CRA primitives and introduce a useful gadget set available in libc. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by implementing nine different shell-codes and exploiting real-world buffer overflow vulnerability in HT Editor 2.0.20.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISC Int. J. Inf. Secur.\",\"volume\":\"201 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISC Int. J. Inf. Secur.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22042/ISECURE.2017.0.0.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISC Int. J. Inf. Secur.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22042/ISECURE.2017.0.0.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dwarf Frankenstein is still in your memory: tiny code reuse attacks
Code reuse attacks such as return oriented programming and jump oriented programming are the most popular exploitation methods among attackers. A large number of practical and non-practical defenses are proposed that differ in their overhead, the source code requirement, detection rate and implementation dependencies. However, a usual aspect among these methods is consideration of the common behaviour of code reuse attacks, which is the construction of a gadget chain. Therefore, the implication of a gadget and the minimum size of an attack chain are a matter of controversy. Conservative or relaxed thresholds may cause false positive and false negative alarms, respectively. The main contribution of this paper is to provide a tricky aspect of code reuse techniques, called tiny code reuse attacks (Tiny-CRA) that demonstrates the ineffectiveness of the threshold based detection methods. We show that with bare minimum assumptions, Tiny-CRA can reduce the size of a gadget chain in shuch a way that no distinction can be detected between normal behavior of a program and a code-reuse execution. To do so, we exhibit our Tiny-CRA primitives and introduce a useful gadget set available in libc. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by implementing nine different shell-codes and exploiting real-world buffer overflow vulnerability in HT Editor 2.0.20.