调和现代性与环保主义:徒劳而美丽的努力

Yueran Chen
{"title":"调和现代性与环保主义:徒劳而美丽的努力","authors":"Yueran Chen","doi":"10.54691/fsd.v3i2.3814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ultimate beauty in the contemporary pursuit of the ecological transition lies not within finding a harmonious balance between social, economic and environmental objectives, but within the collective self-reflection urged by this existential threat. This study, thus, wishes to contribute to the exploration of the relationship between humans and their surroundings by investigating whether modernity and environmentalism are compatible. As it is out of the scope of this paper to discuss all possible combinations of the two given the rich theoretical frameworks that have been established, this study limits itself to the following assumptions. First of all, modernity and environmentalism are only viewed at a collective level (group of people with the same political representative and subscribed to the same political ideology) to put it differently. Secondly, I consider environmentalism as a mode of living that can be continued forever given all other factors being constant. Lastly, this study attributes two different temporalities to the notion of modernity; retrospective and contemporary. With these assumptions in mind, I argue that modernity and environmentalism are not compatible in either of the cases.","PeriodicalId":427767,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sustainable Development","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconciling Modernity and Environmentalism: A Futile Yet Beautiful Effort\",\"authors\":\"Yueran Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.54691/fsd.v3i2.3814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ultimate beauty in the contemporary pursuit of the ecological transition lies not within finding a harmonious balance between social, economic and environmental objectives, but within the collective self-reflection urged by this existential threat. This study, thus, wishes to contribute to the exploration of the relationship between humans and their surroundings by investigating whether modernity and environmentalism are compatible. As it is out of the scope of this paper to discuss all possible combinations of the two given the rich theoretical frameworks that have been established, this study limits itself to the following assumptions. First of all, modernity and environmentalism are only viewed at a collective level (group of people with the same political representative and subscribed to the same political ideology) to put it differently. Secondly, I consider environmentalism as a mode of living that can be continued forever given all other factors being constant. Lastly, this study attributes two different temporalities to the notion of modernity; retrospective and contemporary. With these assumptions in mind, I argue that modernity and environmentalism are not compatible in either of the cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":427767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54691/fsd.v3i2.3814\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54691/fsd.v3i2.3814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当代追求生态转型的终极之美不在于在社会、经济和环境目标之间找到和谐的平衡,而在于这种生存威胁所促使的集体自我反思。因此,本研究希望透过探讨现代性与环保主义是否相容,来探讨人类与周遭环境的关系。鉴于已经建立的丰富的理论框架,讨论两者的所有可能组合超出了本文的范围,因此本研究将其限制为以下假设。首先,换句话说,现代性和环境保护主义只是在集体层面(具有相同政治代表并认同相同政治意识形态的一群人)被看待。其次,我认为环保主义是一种生活方式,在所有其他因素不变的情况下,它可以永远持续下去。最后,本研究将两种不同的时间性归因于现代性的概念;回顾和当代。考虑到这些假设,我认为现代性和环保主义在这两种情况下都是不相容的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconciling Modernity and Environmentalism: A Futile Yet Beautiful Effort
The ultimate beauty in the contemporary pursuit of the ecological transition lies not within finding a harmonious balance between social, economic and environmental objectives, but within the collective self-reflection urged by this existential threat. This study, thus, wishes to contribute to the exploration of the relationship between humans and their surroundings by investigating whether modernity and environmentalism are compatible. As it is out of the scope of this paper to discuss all possible combinations of the two given the rich theoretical frameworks that have been established, this study limits itself to the following assumptions. First of all, modernity and environmentalism are only viewed at a collective level (group of people with the same political representative and subscribed to the same political ideology) to put it differently. Secondly, I consider environmentalism as a mode of living that can be continued forever given all other factors being constant. Lastly, this study attributes two different temporalities to the notion of modernity; retrospective and contemporary. With these assumptions in mind, I argue that modernity and environmentalism are not compatible in either of the cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信