LXC和Docker技术的比较

M. Moravčík, P. Segec, M. Kontšek, J. Uramová, J. Papán
{"title":"LXC和Docker技术的比较","authors":"M. Moravčík, P. Segec, M. Kontšek, J. Uramová, J. Papán","doi":"10.1109/ICETA51985.2020.9379212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with problem of separating computer applications into logical namespaces called containerization. It compares and inspects two world leading Linux container platforms - Linux containers (LXC) and Docker. In the first part, it compares virtual machines and containers. Then the paper analyzes LXC and Docker technologies in depth, highlights their pros and cons. An integral part is also an overview of the various tools used within the technologies.","PeriodicalId":149716,"journal":{"name":"2020 18th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of LXC and Docker Technologies\",\"authors\":\"M. Moravčík, P. Segec, M. Kontšek, J. Uramová, J. Papán\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICETA51985.2020.9379212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper deals with problem of separating computer applications into logical namespaces called containerization. It compares and inspects two world leading Linux container platforms - Linux containers (LXC) and Docker. In the first part, it compares virtual machines and containers. Then the paper analyzes LXC and Docker technologies in depth, highlights their pros and cons. An integral part is also an overview of the various tools used within the technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 18th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 18th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA51985.2020.9379212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 18th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA51985.2020.9379212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文讨论了将计算机应用程序划分为称为容器化的逻辑命名空间的问题。它比较和检查了两个世界领先的Linux容器平台——Linux容器(LXC)和Docker。在第一部分中,比较了虚拟机和容器。然后,本文深入分析了LXC和Docker技术,突出了它们的优缺点,并对技术中使用的各种工具进行了概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of LXC and Docker Technologies
The paper deals with problem of separating computer applications into logical namespaces called containerization. It compares and inspects two world leading Linux container platforms - Linux containers (LXC) and Docker. In the first part, it compares virtual machines and containers. Then the paper analyzes LXC and Docker technologies in depth, highlights their pros and cons. An integral part is also an overview of the various tools used within the technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信