从经验软件工程文献中自动提取信息:这可能吗?

D. Cruzes, V. Basili, F. Shull, M. Jino
{"title":"从经验软件工程文献中自动提取信息:这可能吗?","authors":"D. Cruzes, V. Basili, F. Shull, M. Jino","doi":"10.1109/ESEM.2007.62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of scientific publications is constantly increasing, and the results published on empirical software engineering are growing even faster. Some software engineering publishers have begun to collaborate with research groups to make available repositories of software engineering empirical data. However, these initiatives are limited due to data ownership and privacy issues. As a result, many researchers in the area have adopted systematic reviews as a mean to extract empirical evidence from published material. Systematic reviews are labor intensive and costly. In this paper, we argue that the use of information extraction tools can support systematic reviews and significantly speed up the creation of repositories of SE empirical evidence.","PeriodicalId":124420,"journal":{"name":"First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated Information Extraction from Empirical Software Engineering Literature: Is that possible?\",\"authors\":\"D. Cruzes, V. Basili, F. Shull, M. Jino\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ESEM.2007.62\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The number of scientific publications is constantly increasing, and the results published on empirical software engineering are growing even faster. Some software engineering publishers have begun to collaborate with research groups to make available repositories of software engineering empirical data. However, these initiatives are limited due to data ownership and privacy issues. As a result, many researchers in the area have adopted systematic reviews as a mean to extract empirical evidence from published material. Systematic reviews are labor intensive and costly. In this paper, we argue that the use of information extraction tools can support systematic reviews and significantly speed up the creation of repositories of SE empirical evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2007.62\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2007.62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

科学出版物的数量在不断增加,而发表在经验软件工程方面的结果增长得更快。一些软件工程出版商已经开始与研究小组合作,以提供软件工程经验数据的可用存储库。然而,由于数据所有权和隐私问题,这些举措受到限制。因此,该领域的许多研究人员采用系统综述作为从已发表材料中提取经验证据的手段。系统审查是劳动密集型的,而且成本很高。在本文中,我们认为使用信息提取工具可以支持系统审查,并显著加快SE经验证据存储库的创建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automated Information Extraction from Empirical Software Engineering Literature: Is that possible?
The number of scientific publications is constantly increasing, and the results published on empirical software engineering are growing even faster. Some software engineering publishers have begun to collaborate with research groups to make available repositories of software engineering empirical data. However, these initiatives are limited due to data ownership and privacy issues. As a result, many researchers in the area have adopted systematic reviews as a mean to extract empirical evidence from published material. Systematic reviews are labor intensive and costly. In this paper, we argue that the use of information extraction tools can support systematic reviews and significantly speed up the creation of repositories of SE empirical evidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信