英国长期和短期资本结构动态——一个行业层面的研究

Evarist Stoja, J. Tucker
{"title":"英国长期和短期资本结构动态——一个行业层面的研究","authors":"Evarist Stoja, J. Tucker","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1045101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite significant theoretical and empirical developments in the capital structure literature, the trade-off theory and the related question of the optimality of the gearing ratio remain the subject of intense debate. The pecking order theory emerged to directly contrast with the implications of the trade-off theory. This paper investigates whether industry-optimal gearing ratio targeting behavior arises in the long run while a hierarchy of financing (or pecking order) arises in the short run. The relationship between components of common corporate gearing ratios is investigated using a Johansen co-integration methodology. Evidence of target adjustment is found, though only with respect to certain gearing ratios. Further, adjustment speed coefficients of the error correction representation imply that UK firms close the majority of any deviation from the target with retained earnings rather than external financing. However, while firms in mature industries appear to close the second largest part of any deviation with debt, firms in younger industries appear to close the second largest part of any deviation with equity. A general version of the pecking order theory can reconcile these results.","PeriodicalId":437258,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long and Short-Run Capital Structure Dynamics in the UK - An Industry Level Study\",\"authors\":\"Evarist Stoja, J. Tucker\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1045101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite significant theoretical and empirical developments in the capital structure literature, the trade-off theory and the related question of the optimality of the gearing ratio remain the subject of intense debate. The pecking order theory emerged to directly contrast with the implications of the trade-off theory. This paper investigates whether industry-optimal gearing ratio targeting behavior arises in the long run while a hierarchy of financing (or pecking order) arises in the short run. The relationship between components of common corporate gearing ratios is investigated using a Johansen co-integration methodology. Evidence of target adjustment is found, though only with respect to certain gearing ratios. Further, adjustment speed coefficients of the error correction representation imply that UK firms close the majority of any deviation from the target with retained earnings rather than external financing. However, while firms in mature industries appear to close the second largest part of any deviation with debt, firms in younger industries appear to close the second largest part of any deviation with equity. A general version of the pecking order theory can reconcile these results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1045101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1045101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

尽管资本结构文献中有重大的理论和实证发展,但权衡理论和相关的杠杆比率最优性问题仍然是激烈辩论的主题。啄食顺序理论的出现与权衡理论的含义形成了直接的对比。本文考察了行业最优杠杆比率目标行为在长期是否会产生,而在短期是否会产生融资层次(或啄食顺序)。常用的企业杠杆比率的组成部分之间的关系进行了调查,使用约翰森协整方法。发现了目标调整的证据,尽管只是针对某些负债比率。此外,误差修正表示的调整速度系数表明,英国公司通过留存收益而不是外部融资来弥补大部分偏离目标的情况。然而,虽然成熟行业的公司似乎以债务来解决任何偏差的第二大部分,但年轻行业的公司似乎以股权来解决任何偏差的第二大部分。一般的等级顺序理论可以解释这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long and Short-Run Capital Structure Dynamics in the UK - An Industry Level Study
Despite significant theoretical and empirical developments in the capital structure literature, the trade-off theory and the related question of the optimality of the gearing ratio remain the subject of intense debate. The pecking order theory emerged to directly contrast with the implications of the trade-off theory. This paper investigates whether industry-optimal gearing ratio targeting behavior arises in the long run while a hierarchy of financing (or pecking order) arises in the short run. The relationship between components of common corporate gearing ratios is investigated using a Johansen co-integration methodology. Evidence of target adjustment is found, though only with respect to certain gearing ratios. Further, adjustment speed coefficients of the error correction representation imply that UK firms close the majority of any deviation from the target with retained earnings rather than external financing. However, while firms in mature industries appear to close the second largest part of any deviation with debt, firms in younger industries appear to close the second largest part of any deviation with equity. A general version of the pecking order theory can reconcile these results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信