废墟中重生的自然:约阿希姆·杜·贝雷的《罗马古物》

V. Velázquez
{"title":"废墟中重生的自然:约阿希姆·杜·贝雷的《罗马古物》","authors":"V. Velázquez","doi":"10.5117/9789462985971_ch08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Joachim du Bellay’s Les Antiquitez de Rome (1558) is traditionally read\n as a text about human-made culture: the grandeur and ruin of Rome.\n Nevertheless, through a moral condemnation of imperial Rome’s pride and\n its violent origins, Du Bellay describes the effects Rome’s fall had on the\n nonhuman landscape, thus inviting a re-evaluation of the relation between\n humans and nonhuman nature. His juxtaposition of the destructiveness of\n history’s blindness to nature with the landscape’s re-emergence from the\n ruined remains of Roman culture yields images that challenge us to rethink\n conservation in relation to a nature that changes over time, and which is\n inseparable from culture and its ruins, while at the same time redefining\n the traditional presupposition of what we categorize as ‘nature writing’.","PeriodicalId":180042,"journal":{"name":"Early Modern Écologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Renascent Nature in the Ruins: Joachim du Bellay’s Antiquitez de Rome\",\"authors\":\"V. Velázquez\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/9789462985971_ch08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Joachim du Bellay’s Les Antiquitez de Rome (1558) is traditionally read\\n as a text about human-made culture: the grandeur and ruin of Rome.\\n Nevertheless, through a moral condemnation of imperial Rome’s pride and\\n its violent origins, Du Bellay describes the effects Rome’s fall had on the\\n nonhuman landscape, thus inviting a re-evaluation of the relation between\\n humans and nonhuman nature. His juxtaposition of the destructiveness of\\n history’s blindness to nature with the landscape’s re-emergence from the\\n ruined remains of Roman culture yields images that challenge us to rethink\\n conservation in relation to a nature that changes over time, and which is\\n inseparable from culture and its ruins, while at the same time redefining\\n the traditional presupposition of what we categorize as ‘nature writing’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Modern Écologies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Modern Écologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789462985971_ch08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Modern Écologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789462985971_ch08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

约阿希姆·杜·贝雷的《罗马的古物》(1558)传统上被解读为一部关于人造文化的作品:罗马的辉煌与毁灭。然而,通过对罗马帝国的骄傲及其暴力起源的道德谴责,杜·贝莱描述了罗马的衰落对非人类景观的影响,从而引发了对人类与非人类自然之间关系的重新评估。他将历史对自然的盲目的破坏性与从罗马文化废墟中重新出现的景观并置,产生的图像挑战我们重新思考保护与自然的关系,随着时间的推移,它与文化及其废墟不可分割,同时重新定义我们归类为“自然写作”的传统前提。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Renascent Nature in the Ruins: Joachim du Bellay’s Antiquitez de Rome
Joachim du Bellay’s Les Antiquitez de Rome (1558) is traditionally read as a text about human-made culture: the grandeur and ruin of Rome. Nevertheless, through a moral condemnation of imperial Rome’s pride and its violent origins, Du Bellay describes the effects Rome’s fall had on the nonhuman landscape, thus inviting a re-evaluation of the relation between humans and nonhuman nature. His juxtaposition of the destructiveness of history’s blindness to nature with the landscape’s re-emergence from the ruined remains of Roman culture yields images that challenge us to rethink conservation in relation to a nature that changes over time, and which is inseparable from culture and its ruins, while at the same time redefining the traditional presupposition of what we categorize as ‘nature writing’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信