宗教教育中的罪与耻

Z. Khosravi
{"title":"宗教教育中的罪与耻","authors":"Z. Khosravi","doi":"10.12738/TALIM.2018.1.0100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To cite this article: Khosravi, Z. (2018). Guilt and shame in religious education. Talim: Journal of Education in Muslim Societies and Communıities, 2, 5‒22. https://dx.doi.org/10.12738/talim.2018.1.0100 1 Correspondence to: Zohreh Khosravi (PhD), Professor of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Vanak, P.O. Box: 1993891176, Tehran Iran. Email: zohreh_khosravi@yahoo.com Abstract Learning self-control is an important component of religious education. However, the relation between religion and psychological well-being is controversial. While some findings indicate religiosity to be associated with mental disorders, other findings show it provides people with calm and hope. The manner in which guilt forms, which is important for both religious and psychological studies, can shed some light on this controversy. Guilt appears as a cognitive-emotional experience when people breach their believed religious and moral standards. The two concepts of guilt and shame should be distinguished. While guilt refers to behavior, shame deals with the person’s whole self. Thus, guilt can be associated with taking responsibility for one’s behavior whereas shame undermines the whole personality of a person and targets one’s self-esteem. In addition, shame is profoundly dependent on others’ judgments and leads to rumination and feeling worthless. Distinguishing between guilt and shame can explain this controversy. The positive association between religiosity and psychological disturbances results from the feeling of shame, whereas feeling of guilt can explain the negative correlation between religiosity and psychological disorders. This differentiation is important in Islamic education. According to Islamic teachings, people should retain their self-esteem even when they commit negative actions. The negative action itself should be the aim of critique and blame rather than the spirit of the person, which has a divine origin. Thus, distinguishing between action and agent should be taken as a strategy in Islamic religious education so that only the bad action is taken at issue, whether for blame or change. On the other hand, the whole personality of the person should be taken as a respected entity. This is why Islam views despair as a supreme fault because associates a person with basically being worthless.","PeriodicalId":181390,"journal":{"name":"Talim: Journal of Education in Muslim Societies and Communities","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guilt and Shame in Religious Education\",\"authors\":\"Z. Khosravi\",\"doi\":\"10.12738/TALIM.2018.1.0100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To cite this article: Khosravi, Z. (2018). Guilt and shame in religious education. Talim: Journal of Education in Muslim Societies and Communıities, 2, 5‒22. https://dx.doi.org/10.12738/talim.2018.1.0100 1 Correspondence to: Zohreh Khosravi (PhD), Professor of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Vanak, P.O. Box: 1993891176, Tehran Iran. Email: zohreh_khosravi@yahoo.com Abstract Learning self-control is an important component of religious education. However, the relation between religion and psychological well-being is controversial. While some findings indicate religiosity to be associated with mental disorders, other findings show it provides people with calm and hope. The manner in which guilt forms, which is important for both religious and psychological studies, can shed some light on this controversy. Guilt appears as a cognitive-emotional experience when people breach their believed religious and moral standards. The two concepts of guilt and shame should be distinguished. While guilt refers to behavior, shame deals with the person’s whole self. Thus, guilt can be associated with taking responsibility for one’s behavior whereas shame undermines the whole personality of a person and targets one’s self-esteem. In addition, shame is profoundly dependent on others’ judgments and leads to rumination and feeling worthless. Distinguishing between guilt and shame can explain this controversy. The positive association between religiosity and psychological disturbances results from the feeling of shame, whereas feeling of guilt can explain the negative correlation between religiosity and psychological disorders. This differentiation is important in Islamic education. According to Islamic teachings, people should retain their self-esteem even when they commit negative actions. The negative action itself should be the aim of critique and blame rather than the spirit of the person, which has a divine origin. Thus, distinguishing between action and agent should be taken as a strategy in Islamic religious education so that only the bad action is taken at issue, whether for blame or change. On the other hand, the whole personality of the person should be taken as a respected entity. This is why Islam views despair as a supreme fault because associates a person with basically being worthless.\",\"PeriodicalId\":181390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Talim: Journal of Education in Muslim Societies and Communities\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Talim: Journal of Education in Muslim Societies and Communities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12738/TALIM.2018.1.0100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Talim: Journal of Education in Muslim Societies and Communities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12738/TALIM.2018.1.0100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

引用本文:Khosravi, Z.(2018)。宗教教育中的内疚和羞耻。Talim:穆斯林社会的教育杂志Communıities, 2, 5-22。https://dx.doi.org/10.12738/talim.2018.1.0100 1通信:Zohreh Khosravi(博士),临床心理学教授,教育和心理学院,阿尔扎赫拉大学,Vanak,邮政信箱:1993891176,伊朗德黑兰。摘要学习自我控制是宗教教育的重要组成部分。然而,宗教与心理健康之间的关系是有争议的。虽然一些研究结果表明,宗教信仰与精神障碍有关,但其他研究结果表明,宗教信仰给人们带来了平静和希望。内疚形成的方式对宗教和心理学研究都很重要,可以为这一争议提供一些启示。当人们违背他们所信仰的宗教和道德标准时,内疚就会以一种认知情感体验的形式出现。内疚和羞耻这两个概念应该加以区分。内疚指的是行为,而羞耻则涉及一个人的整个自我。因此,内疚可能与为自己的行为负责有关,而羞耻会破坏一个人的整个个性,并打击一个人的自尊。此外,羞耻深深地依赖于他人的判断,并导致沉思和感觉自己毫无价值。区分内疚和羞耻可以解释这一争议。宗教信仰与心理障碍的正相关来自于羞耻感,而内疚感可以解释宗教信仰与心理障碍的负相关。这种区别在伊斯兰教育中很重要。根据伊斯兰教义,人们即使做了坏事也要保持自尊。消极行为本身应该是批判和指责的目标,而不是人的精神,这有一个神圣的起源。因此,在伊斯兰宗教教育中,区分行动和动因应该作为一种策略,这样,无论是为了指责还是为了改变,只有不好的行动才是有争议的。另一方面,人的整个人格应该被视为一个受尊重的实体。这就是为什么伊斯兰教认为绝望是最高的错误,因为它把一个人与基本上毫无价值的人联系在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Guilt and Shame in Religious Education
To cite this article: Khosravi, Z. (2018). Guilt and shame in religious education. Talim: Journal of Education in Muslim Societies and Communıities, 2, 5‒22. https://dx.doi.org/10.12738/talim.2018.1.0100 1 Correspondence to: Zohreh Khosravi (PhD), Professor of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Vanak, P.O. Box: 1993891176, Tehran Iran. Email: zohreh_khosravi@yahoo.com Abstract Learning self-control is an important component of religious education. However, the relation between religion and psychological well-being is controversial. While some findings indicate religiosity to be associated with mental disorders, other findings show it provides people with calm and hope. The manner in which guilt forms, which is important for both religious and psychological studies, can shed some light on this controversy. Guilt appears as a cognitive-emotional experience when people breach their believed religious and moral standards. The two concepts of guilt and shame should be distinguished. While guilt refers to behavior, shame deals with the person’s whole self. Thus, guilt can be associated with taking responsibility for one’s behavior whereas shame undermines the whole personality of a person and targets one’s self-esteem. In addition, shame is profoundly dependent on others’ judgments and leads to rumination and feeling worthless. Distinguishing between guilt and shame can explain this controversy. The positive association between religiosity and psychological disturbances results from the feeling of shame, whereas feeling of guilt can explain the negative correlation between religiosity and psychological disorders. This differentiation is important in Islamic education. According to Islamic teachings, people should retain their self-esteem even when they commit negative actions. The negative action itself should be the aim of critique and blame rather than the spirit of the person, which has a divine origin. Thus, distinguishing between action and agent should be taken as a strategy in Islamic religious education so that only the bad action is taken at issue, whether for blame or change. On the other hand, the whole personality of the person should be taken as a respected entity. This is why Islam views despair as a supreme fault because associates a person with basically being worthless.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信