关于尼泊尔的司法审查概念框架

Shyam Kumar Bhattarai
{"title":"关于尼泊尔的司法审查概念框架","authors":"Shyam Kumar Bhattarai","doi":"10.11648/j.ash.20230902.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The power of the Judicial Review is considered as the touchstone to test constitutionality of the state action including legislation. It brings life and dynamism to the constitutional system. It brings about constitutional clarity and fulfills any gaps that may arise in the constitution. Judicial review controls the arbitrariness of government and protects civil liberties by maintaining the rule of law. The judicial review is exercised to make state organs and bodies as well as government and public officials disciplined and accountable. It is the foundation of constitutional government. The scope of judicial review can be categorized as judicial review of legislation, judicial review of executive action, and judicial review of judicial action. There are several grounds the judiciary can exercise its power. Compliance with the constitution and protection of civilian rights are the fundamental basis of judicial review. The grounds upon which state organs are subject to control by the judicial review have been classified as illegality, irrationality, and procedural impropriety. Its concern is whether a decision-making authority has exceeded its power, committed an error of law, committed a breach of rules of natural justice, and reached a decision without reasonable ground or by abusing its power. The concept of judicial review is not away from criticism. It is often said that judicial review is intolerably uncertain and amounts to little more than a license for judges to interfere arbitrarily with the machinery of government and administration. The power of judicial review has been criticized for being against democratic legitimacy. The question arises that is justifiable for the court to question the validity of the actions of the elected members of the parliament. This question makes the concept of judicial review as the most controversial feature of the Constitution. But this right is not an authority to make the court higher and more powerful than other organs, but it is a means to establish constitutional supremacy and rule of law.","PeriodicalId":300225,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Sciences and Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptual Framework of Judicial Review with Reference to Nepal\",\"authors\":\"Shyam Kumar Bhattarai\",\"doi\":\"10.11648/j.ash.20230902.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": The power of the Judicial Review is considered as the touchstone to test constitutionality of the state action including legislation. It brings life and dynamism to the constitutional system. It brings about constitutional clarity and fulfills any gaps that may arise in the constitution. Judicial review controls the arbitrariness of government and protects civil liberties by maintaining the rule of law. The judicial review is exercised to make state organs and bodies as well as government and public officials disciplined and accountable. It is the foundation of constitutional government. The scope of judicial review can be categorized as judicial review of legislation, judicial review of executive action, and judicial review of judicial action. There are several grounds the judiciary can exercise its power. Compliance with the constitution and protection of civilian rights are the fundamental basis of judicial review. The grounds upon which state organs are subject to control by the judicial review have been classified as illegality, irrationality, and procedural impropriety. Its concern is whether a decision-making authority has exceeded its power, committed an error of law, committed a breach of rules of natural justice, and reached a decision without reasonable ground or by abusing its power. The concept of judicial review is not away from criticism. It is often said that judicial review is intolerably uncertain and amounts to little more than a license for judges to interfere arbitrarily with the machinery of government and administration. The power of judicial review has been criticized for being against democratic legitimacy. The question arises that is justifiable for the court to question the validity of the actions of the elected members of the parliament. This question makes the concept of judicial review as the most controversial feature of the Constitution. But this right is not an authority to make the court higher and more powerful than other organs, but it is a means to establish constitutional supremacy and rule of law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Sciences and Humanities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Sciences and Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20230902.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20230902.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

司法审查的权力被认为是检验包括立法在内的国家行为是否合宪性的试金石。它给宪法制度带来了生机和活力。它带来了宪法的清晰度,并填补了宪法中可能出现的任何空白。司法审查控制了政府的专断,并通过维护法治来保护公民自由。实行司法审查是为了使国家机关和机关以及政府和公职人员遵守纪律和问责。这是宪政的基础。司法审查的范围可分为立法的司法审查、行政行为的司法审查和司法行为的司法审查。司法部门有几个理由可以行使其权力。遵守宪法和保障公民权利是司法审查的根本依据。国家机关受司法审查控制的理由分为非法、不合理和程序不当。它关注的是决策当局是否越权,是否犯了法律错误,是否违反了自然正义的规则,是否在没有合理根据或滥用权力的情况下作出了决定。司法审查的概念难免受到批评。人们常说,司法审查的不确定性令人无法容忍,只不过是给法官开了一张许可证,让他们任意干涉政府和行政机构。司法审查权因违反民主合法性而受到批评。出现的问题是,法院有理由质疑当选议员行为的有效性。这一问题使司法审查概念成为宪法最具争议的特征。但这种权利并不是使法院凌驾于其他机关之上的权威,而是确立宪法至上和法治的一种手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conceptual Framework of Judicial Review with Reference to Nepal
: The power of the Judicial Review is considered as the touchstone to test constitutionality of the state action including legislation. It brings life and dynamism to the constitutional system. It brings about constitutional clarity and fulfills any gaps that may arise in the constitution. Judicial review controls the arbitrariness of government and protects civil liberties by maintaining the rule of law. The judicial review is exercised to make state organs and bodies as well as government and public officials disciplined and accountable. It is the foundation of constitutional government. The scope of judicial review can be categorized as judicial review of legislation, judicial review of executive action, and judicial review of judicial action. There are several grounds the judiciary can exercise its power. Compliance with the constitution and protection of civilian rights are the fundamental basis of judicial review. The grounds upon which state organs are subject to control by the judicial review have been classified as illegality, irrationality, and procedural impropriety. Its concern is whether a decision-making authority has exceeded its power, committed an error of law, committed a breach of rules of natural justice, and reached a decision without reasonable ground or by abusing its power. The concept of judicial review is not away from criticism. It is often said that judicial review is intolerably uncertain and amounts to little more than a license for judges to interfere arbitrarily with the machinery of government and administration. The power of judicial review has been criticized for being against democratic legitimacy. The question arises that is justifiable for the court to question the validity of the actions of the elected members of the parliament. This question makes the concept of judicial review as the most controversial feature of the Constitution. But this right is not an authority to make the court higher and more powerful than other organs, but it is a means to establish constitutional supremacy and rule of law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信