一个林分内单株生产力的模拟变化:苜蓿作物自上而下和自下而上方法的比较

L. Gaetan, F. Ela, C. Didier, E. Abraham
{"title":"一个林分内单株生产力的模拟变化:苜蓿作物自上而下和自下而上方法的比较","authors":"L. Gaetan, F. Ela, C. Didier, E. Abraham","doi":"10.1109/PMA.2012.6524843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modelling individual variations in plant productivity and resource-dependent mortality is a key issue in population dynamic models. The present study examined two classical approaches to account for plant productivity in functional-structural plant models (i.e. the up-scaling of a leaf photosynthesis model, and the down-scaling of a canopy production model) and compares them in their ability to account for the size-structure of a population of alfalfa plants competing for light. The two models differed mainly in their formulation of the plant carbon balance. Only the leaf approach included a respiration sub-model and was able to predict self-thinning and changes in radiation use efficiency among plants. Variations in plant mass were however mainly explained by differences in light interception. The two models behaved quite well to simulate the mass distribution of surviving plants, the leaf model being clearly more difficult to calibrate.","PeriodicalId":117786,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE 4th International Symposium on Plant Growth Modeling, Simulation, Visualization and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling variations in individual plant productivity within a stand: Comparison of top-down and bottom-up approaches in an alfalfa crop\",\"authors\":\"L. Gaetan, F. Ela, C. Didier, E. Abraham\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PMA.2012.6524843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modelling individual variations in plant productivity and resource-dependent mortality is a key issue in population dynamic models. The present study examined two classical approaches to account for plant productivity in functional-structural plant models (i.e. the up-scaling of a leaf photosynthesis model, and the down-scaling of a canopy production model) and compares them in their ability to account for the size-structure of a population of alfalfa plants competing for light. The two models differed mainly in their formulation of the plant carbon balance. Only the leaf approach included a respiration sub-model and was able to predict self-thinning and changes in radiation use efficiency among plants. Variations in plant mass were however mainly explained by differences in light interception. The two models behaved quite well to simulate the mass distribution of surviving plants, the leaf model being clearly more difficult to calibrate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 IEEE 4th International Symposium on Plant Growth Modeling, Simulation, Visualization and Applications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 IEEE 4th International Symposium on Plant Growth Modeling, Simulation, Visualization and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PMA.2012.6524843\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE 4th International Symposium on Plant Growth Modeling, Simulation, Visualization and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PMA.2012.6524843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

模拟植物生产力和资源依赖性死亡率的个体差异是种群动态模型中的一个关键问题。本研究考察了在植物功能-结构模型中解释植物生产力的两种经典方法(即叶片光合作用模型的上升尺度和冠层生产模型的下降尺度),并比较了它们解释苜蓿植物群体竞争光的大小-结构的能力。两种模式的差异主要体现在植物碳平衡的表述上。只有叶片方法包含呼吸子模型,能够预测植物间的自疏和辐射利用效率的变化。然而,植物质量的变化主要是由光拦截的差异来解释的。这两个模型在模拟存活植物的质量分布方面表现得很好,但叶片模型显然更难校准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modelling variations in individual plant productivity within a stand: Comparison of top-down and bottom-up approaches in an alfalfa crop
Modelling individual variations in plant productivity and resource-dependent mortality is a key issue in population dynamic models. The present study examined two classical approaches to account for plant productivity in functional-structural plant models (i.e. the up-scaling of a leaf photosynthesis model, and the down-scaling of a canopy production model) and compares them in their ability to account for the size-structure of a population of alfalfa plants competing for light. The two models differed mainly in their formulation of the plant carbon balance. Only the leaf approach included a respiration sub-model and was able to predict self-thinning and changes in radiation use efficiency among plants. Variations in plant mass were however mainly explained by differences in light interception. The two models behaved quite well to simulate the mass distribution of surviving plants, the leaf model being clearly more difficult to calibrate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信