84 .对加拿大马尼托巴省低剂量可待因过度使用的监管推动的影响

S. Bugden, K. Friesen, Jamie Falk
{"title":"84 .对加拿大马尼托巴省低剂量可待因过度使用的监管推动的影响","authors":"S. Bugden, K. Friesen, Jamie Falk","doi":"10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111070.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Low-dose codeine products (⩽8 mg codeine/tablet) have been available over-the-counter from Canadian pharmacies for many years. In the era of the North American opioid crisis there has been concern about the volume of low-dose sales and their potential to contribute to the problem. This concern extended to the potential for acetaminophen/paracetamol toxicity. There has been widespread criticism about the lack of assessment by pharmacists in the provision of these products. In 2016, Manitoba became one of the few provinces to impose further regulation on the provision of low-dose codeine products. After February 2016 these products could only be dispensed with a prescription. Pharmacists were able to provide these prescriptions but only after a complete and documented assessment (sign and symptoms, medical history, length and severity of condition). In this study we explore the impact and potential unintended consequences of this regulatory nudge on low-dose codeine use. Method A drug utilization analysis was conducted for the year before and after the policy change. Sales information was reported by the College of Pharmacists of Manitoba from the Quintiles IMS Canadian Drug Store and Hospital Purchases Audit. Prescription codeine use was assessed using the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository using data released in January 2018. The effects of this policy change on the use of other prescribed opioids were assessed by piecewise Poisson regression analysis. Results In the year before the regulatory nudge sales data reported 52.5 million low-dose codeine tablets sold in Manitoba. This fell by 94% to 3.3 million tablets in the year after the change and this was confirmed in the research database which also showed dispensations for 3.3 million tablets. The prescribing of low-dose codeine was split evenly between pharmacists (49%) and physicians (48%). In its first year as a prescribed product, low-dose codeine use declined from 0.30 to 0.26 million tablets/month. Poisson regression analysis found no significant effect of this changeover on the trends in the utilization of higher strength codeine products, tramadol, and oxycodone with acetaminophen products. Conclusions Manitoba’s regulatory nudge reduced low-dose codeine usage by 94% without obvious negative implications. Other provincial or national policy changes should be considered to implement this simple change on a nationwide basis.","PeriodicalId":298595,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Evidenced-Based Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"84 The impact of a regulatory nudge on the overuse of low dose codeine in manitoba, canada\",\"authors\":\"S. Bugden, K. Friesen, Jamie Falk\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111070.84\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives Low-dose codeine products (⩽8 mg codeine/tablet) have been available over-the-counter from Canadian pharmacies for many years. In the era of the North American opioid crisis there has been concern about the volume of low-dose sales and their potential to contribute to the problem. This concern extended to the potential for acetaminophen/paracetamol toxicity. There has been widespread criticism about the lack of assessment by pharmacists in the provision of these products. In 2016, Manitoba became one of the few provinces to impose further regulation on the provision of low-dose codeine products. After February 2016 these products could only be dispensed with a prescription. Pharmacists were able to provide these prescriptions but only after a complete and documented assessment (sign and symptoms, medical history, length and severity of condition). In this study we explore the impact and potential unintended consequences of this regulatory nudge on low-dose codeine use. Method A drug utilization analysis was conducted for the year before and after the policy change. Sales information was reported by the College of Pharmacists of Manitoba from the Quintiles IMS Canadian Drug Store and Hospital Purchases Audit. Prescription codeine use was assessed using the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository using data released in January 2018. The effects of this policy change on the use of other prescribed opioids were assessed by piecewise Poisson regression analysis. Results In the year before the regulatory nudge sales data reported 52.5 million low-dose codeine tablets sold in Manitoba. This fell by 94% to 3.3 million tablets in the year after the change and this was confirmed in the research database which also showed dispensations for 3.3 million tablets. The prescribing of low-dose codeine was split evenly between pharmacists (49%) and physicians (48%). In its first year as a prescribed product, low-dose codeine use declined from 0.30 to 0.26 million tablets/month. Poisson regression analysis found no significant effect of this changeover on the trends in the utilization of higher strength codeine products, tramadol, and oxycodone with acetaminophen products. Conclusions Manitoba’s regulatory nudge reduced low-dose codeine usage by 94% without obvious negative implications. Other provincial or national policy changes should be considered to implement this simple change on a nationwide basis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Evidenced-Based Medicine\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Evidenced-Based Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111070.84\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Evidenced-Based Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111070.84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

低剂量可待因产品(≤8 mg /片)在加拿大药店非处方销售已有多年。在北美阿片类药物危机时代,人们一直担心低剂量销售的数量及其可能加剧这一问题。这种关注扩展到对乙酰氨基酚/扑热息痛毒性的可能性。人们普遍批评药剂师在提供这些产品时缺乏评估。2016年,曼尼托巴省成为少数几个对低剂量可待因产品提供进一步监管的省份之一。2016年2月以后,这些产品只能在处方下使用。药剂师能够提供这些处方,但必须经过完整和记录的评估(体征和症状、病史、病程长短和严重程度)。在这项研究中,我们探讨了这种监管推动对低剂量可待因使用的影响和潜在的意想不到的后果。方法对政策变更前后一年的用药情况进行分析。销售信息由曼尼托巴省药剂师学院从昆泰IMS加拿大药店和医院采购审计报告。处方可待因的使用使用马尼托巴人口研究数据库使用2018年1月发布的数据进行评估。通过分段泊松回归分析评估了这一政策变化对其他处方阿片类药物使用的影响。结果在监管推动前一年的销售数据显示,曼尼托巴省销售了5250万片低剂量可待因片。在改革后的一年里,这一数字下降了94%,降至330万片,这在研究数据库中得到了证实,该数据库也显示了330万片的配药量。低剂量可待因的处方在药剂师(49%)和医生(48%)之间平均分配。在作为处方产品的第一年,低剂量可待因的使用量从每月0.30万片下降到0.26万片。泊松回归分析发现,这种转变对使用高强度可待因产品、曲马多和羟考酮与对乙酰氨基酚产品的趋势没有显著影响。结论曼尼托巴省的监管推动使低剂量可待因的使用减少了94%,没有明显的负面影响。应该考虑其他省级或国家的政策变化,以便在全国范围内实施这一简单的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
84 The impact of a regulatory nudge on the overuse of low dose codeine in manitoba, canada
Objectives Low-dose codeine products (⩽8 mg codeine/tablet) have been available over-the-counter from Canadian pharmacies for many years. In the era of the North American opioid crisis there has been concern about the volume of low-dose sales and their potential to contribute to the problem. This concern extended to the potential for acetaminophen/paracetamol toxicity. There has been widespread criticism about the lack of assessment by pharmacists in the provision of these products. In 2016, Manitoba became one of the few provinces to impose further regulation on the provision of low-dose codeine products. After February 2016 these products could only be dispensed with a prescription. Pharmacists were able to provide these prescriptions but only after a complete and documented assessment (sign and symptoms, medical history, length and severity of condition). In this study we explore the impact and potential unintended consequences of this regulatory nudge on low-dose codeine use. Method A drug utilization analysis was conducted for the year before and after the policy change. Sales information was reported by the College of Pharmacists of Manitoba from the Quintiles IMS Canadian Drug Store and Hospital Purchases Audit. Prescription codeine use was assessed using the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository using data released in January 2018. The effects of this policy change on the use of other prescribed opioids were assessed by piecewise Poisson regression analysis. Results In the year before the regulatory nudge sales data reported 52.5 million low-dose codeine tablets sold in Manitoba. This fell by 94% to 3.3 million tablets in the year after the change and this was confirmed in the research database which also showed dispensations for 3.3 million tablets. The prescribing of low-dose codeine was split evenly between pharmacists (49%) and physicians (48%). In its first year as a prescribed product, low-dose codeine use declined from 0.30 to 0.26 million tablets/month. Poisson regression analysis found no significant effect of this changeover on the trends in the utilization of higher strength codeine products, tramadol, and oxycodone with acetaminophen products. Conclusions Manitoba’s regulatory nudge reduced low-dose codeine usage by 94% without obvious negative implications. Other provincial or national policy changes should be considered to implement this simple change on a nationwide basis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信