重新审视擦除编码内存存储的更新方案

Jie Xia, Jianzhong Huang, X. Qin, Q. Cao, C. Xie
{"title":"重新审视擦除编码内存存储的更新方案","authors":"Jie Xia, Jianzhong Huang, X. Qin, Q. Cao, C. Xie","doi":"10.1109/NAS.2017.8026875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Erasure coding has been gradually adopted by existing data-intensive in-memory stores for 'hot' data; small writes lead to expensive updating overheads in such in-memory stores characterized by update-heavy workloads. There is a pressing demand to address the issue of data updates for erasure-coded in-memory stores. We revisit existing updating schemes in erasure-coded storage clusters by investigating the applicability of these updating schemes to erasure-coded in- memory stores. After an intensive analysis, we propose a grouping-update mechanism - GU - to handle small writes in in-memory stores. With GU in place, requests in an updating window are categorized into several updating groups, where multiple small updates in the same stripe can be executed concurrently. Furthermore, we bring forward a hybrid-updating scheme - Hybrid-U - to minimize total updating I/Os over network under common writes (e.g., small and large writes). We evaluate four dedicated updating schemes, four GU- based updating schemes and Hybrid-U. Our experiments illustrate that GU-based updating schemes and Hybrid-U outperform the four dedicated updating schemes in terms of updating time.","PeriodicalId":222161,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Networking, Architecture, and Storage (NAS)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting Updating Schemes for Erasure-Coded In-Memory Stores\",\"authors\":\"Jie Xia, Jianzhong Huang, X. Qin, Q. Cao, C. Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NAS.2017.8026875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Erasure coding has been gradually adopted by existing data-intensive in-memory stores for 'hot' data; small writes lead to expensive updating overheads in such in-memory stores characterized by update-heavy workloads. There is a pressing demand to address the issue of data updates for erasure-coded in-memory stores. We revisit existing updating schemes in erasure-coded storage clusters by investigating the applicability of these updating schemes to erasure-coded in- memory stores. After an intensive analysis, we propose a grouping-update mechanism - GU - to handle small writes in in-memory stores. With GU in place, requests in an updating window are categorized into several updating groups, where multiple small updates in the same stripe can be executed concurrently. Furthermore, we bring forward a hybrid-updating scheme - Hybrid-U - to minimize total updating I/Os over network under common writes (e.g., small and large writes). We evaluate four dedicated updating schemes, four GU- based updating schemes and Hybrid-U. Our experiments illustrate that GU-based updating schemes and Hybrid-U outperform the four dedicated updating schemes in terms of updating time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":222161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Conference on Networking, Architecture, and Storage (NAS)\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Conference on Networking, Architecture, and Storage (NAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAS.2017.8026875\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Networking, Architecture, and Storage (NAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAS.2017.8026875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

擦除编码已逐渐被现有的数据密集型内存存储所采用,用于“热”数据;在这种以更新工作量大为特征的内存存储中,小的写入会导致昂贵的更新开销。迫切需要解决内存存储中擦除编码的数据更新问题。通过研究这些更新方案对内存存储的适用性,我们重新审视了现有的擦除编码存储集群中的更新方案。经过深入的分析,我们提出了一种分组更新机制- GU -来处理内存存储中的小写操作。有了GU,更新窗口中的请求被分类到几个更新组中,其中同一条中的多个小更新可以并发执行。此外,我们提出了一种混合更新方案- Hybrid-U -以减少在常见写(例如,小写和大写)下网络上的总更新I/ o。我们评估了四种专用的更新方案、四种基于GU的更新方案和Hybrid-U。我们的实验表明,基于gpu的更新方案和Hybrid-U在更新时间方面优于四种专用更新方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting Updating Schemes for Erasure-Coded In-Memory Stores
Erasure coding has been gradually adopted by existing data-intensive in-memory stores for 'hot' data; small writes lead to expensive updating overheads in such in-memory stores characterized by update-heavy workloads. There is a pressing demand to address the issue of data updates for erasure-coded in-memory stores. We revisit existing updating schemes in erasure-coded storage clusters by investigating the applicability of these updating schemes to erasure-coded in- memory stores. After an intensive analysis, we propose a grouping-update mechanism - GU - to handle small writes in in-memory stores. With GU in place, requests in an updating window are categorized into several updating groups, where multiple small updates in the same stripe can be executed concurrently. Furthermore, we bring forward a hybrid-updating scheme - Hybrid-U - to minimize total updating I/Os over network under common writes (e.g., small and large writes). We evaluate four dedicated updating schemes, four GU- based updating schemes and Hybrid-U. Our experiments illustrate that GU-based updating schemes and Hybrid-U outperform the four dedicated updating schemes in terms of updating time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信