复杂入路检查骨关节炎患者膝关节功能

A. Fedoseyev, Aleksandr A. Chekushin, R. V. Tishkin, Aleksey N. Dobychin, Grigoriy Yu. Zenkin, Aleksandra D. Prints, Mariya S. Melyokhina, Anna V. Tkachik, Andrey A. Zubov
{"title":"复杂入路检查骨关节炎患者膝关节功能","authors":"A. Fedoseyev, Aleksandr A. Chekushin, R. V. Tishkin, Aleksey N. Dobychin, Grigoriy Yu. Zenkin, Aleksandra D. Prints, Mariya S. Melyokhina, Anna V. Tkachik, Andrey A. Zubov","doi":"10.17816/pavlovj109633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee joint (KJ) is a common problem. The basic factors impairing the function of the KJ are pain and restriction of movement. Evaluation of function of the KJ in OA is an indispensable part of the diagnostic and treatment process. There exists a problem of a quantitative evaluation of pain and restriction of movement of the KJ in OA, associated with the absence of a single standard for evaluation of the KJ function. In the article, the data are given on the modern possibilities for evaluation of the KJ function in OA. The KJ function is evaluated in clinical examination, functional tests, numerous functional questionnaires, as well as with the use of devices for record of movements. Clinical picture of OA of the KJ is evaluated in the clinical examination which includes diagnostic tests, evaluation of the volume of movement, force of muscles, with conclusions about the phenotype of the disease. Functional tests recommended by OARSI (Osteoarthritis Research Society International) are preferable for express-testing, but not all of them have reference values. Functional questionnaires for evaluation of the KJ function exist in many variants, which impedes their choice and interaction between specialists, and they are characterized by different labor intensity in use. There exists a diversity of devices for evaluation of function of the KJ, some of which are expensive, require special rooms, training of the specialist, and take considerable time. Others are simpler in use and inexpensive, but give less reliable results. \nCONCLUSION: The authors showed the possibilities of a comprehensive evaluation, described the problem of the lack of a single standard for investigation of the KJ function. A conclusion is made about the necessity to develop a software-hardware complex that maximally satisfies the criteria of objectivity, accessibility and quickness of use for evaluation of function of the KJ in OA.","PeriodicalId":113364,"journal":{"name":"I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complex Approach in Examination of Function of the Knee Joint in Patients with Osteoarthritis\",\"authors\":\"A. Fedoseyev, Aleksandr A. Chekushin, R. V. Tishkin, Aleksey N. Dobychin, Grigoriy Yu. Zenkin, Aleksandra D. Prints, Mariya S. Melyokhina, Anna V. Tkachik, Andrey A. Zubov\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/pavlovj109633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee joint (KJ) is a common problem. The basic factors impairing the function of the KJ are pain and restriction of movement. Evaluation of function of the KJ in OA is an indispensable part of the diagnostic and treatment process. There exists a problem of a quantitative evaluation of pain and restriction of movement of the KJ in OA, associated with the absence of a single standard for evaluation of the KJ function. In the article, the data are given on the modern possibilities for evaluation of the KJ function in OA. The KJ function is evaluated in clinical examination, functional tests, numerous functional questionnaires, as well as with the use of devices for record of movements. Clinical picture of OA of the KJ is evaluated in the clinical examination which includes diagnostic tests, evaluation of the volume of movement, force of muscles, with conclusions about the phenotype of the disease. Functional tests recommended by OARSI (Osteoarthritis Research Society International) are preferable for express-testing, but not all of them have reference values. Functional questionnaires for evaluation of the KJ function exist in many variants, which impedes their choice and interaction between specialists, and they are characterized by different labor intensity in use. There exists a diversity of devices for evaluation of function of the KJ, some of which are expensive, require special rooms, training of the specialist, and take considerable time. Others are simpler in use and inexpensive, but give less reliable results. \\nCONCLUSION: The authors showed the possibilities of a comprehensive evaluation, described the problem of the lack of a single standard for investigation of the KJ function. A conclusion is made about the necessity to develop a software-hardware complex that maximally satisfies the criteria of objectivity, accessibility and quickness of use for evaluation of function of the KJ in OA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/pavlovj109633\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/pavlovj109633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

膝关节(KJ)的骨关节炎(OA)是一个常见的问题。损害KJ功能的基本因素是疼痛和活动受限。评估骨性关节炎中KJ的功能是诊断和治疗过程中不可缺少的一部分。由于缺乏评价KJ功能的单一标准,存在着对OA患者KJ疼痛和活动受限进行定量评价的问题。本文给出了评价OA中KJ函数的现代可能性的数据。KJ功能通过临床检查、功能测试、大量功能问卷以及使用运动记录设备进行评估。KJ骨性关节炎的临床表现在临床检查中进行评估,包括诊断测试、活动量评估、肌肉力量评估,以及关于疾病表型的结论。OARSI(国际骨关节炎研究学会)推荐的功能测试是表达测试的首选,但并非所有的功能测试都有参考价值。用于评价KJ函数的功能问卷存在多种变体,阻碍了专家之间的选择和互动,并且在使用时具有不同的劳动强度。有各种各样的设备用于评估KJ的功能,其中一些是昂贵的,需要特殊的房间,专家的培训,并需要相当长的时间。其他方法使用简单,价格便宜,但结果不太可靠。结论:作者展示了综合评价的可能性,描述了缺乏单一标准调查KJ功能的问题。提出了开发一种最大限度地满足客观、可及性和使用快速性标准的软硬件综合评价OA中KJ功能的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complex Approach in Examination of Function of the Knee Joint in Patients with Osteoarthritis
INTRODUCTION: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee joint (KJ) is a common problem. The basic factors impairing the function of the KJ are pain and restriction of movement. Evaluation of function of the KJ in OA is an indispensable part of the diagnostic and treatment process. There exists a problem of a quantitative evaluation of pain and restriction of movement of the KJ in OA, associated with the absence of a single standard for evaluation of the KJ function. In the article, the data are given on the modern possibilities for evaluation of the KJ function in OA. The KJ function is evaluated in clinical examination, functional tests, numerous functional questionnaires, as well as with the use of devices for record of movements. Clinical picture of OA of the KJ is evaluated in the clinical examination which includes diagnostic tests, evaluation of the volume of movement, force of muscles, with conclusions about the phenotype of the disease. Functional tests recommended by OARSI (Osteoarthritis Research Society International) are preferable for express-testing, but not all of them have reference values. Functional questionnaires for evaluation of the KJ function exist in many variants, which impedes their choice and interaction between specialists, and they are characterized by different labor intensity in use. There exists a diversity of devices for evaluation of function of the KJ, some of which are expensive, require special rooms, training of the specialist, and take considerable time. Others are simpler in use and inexpensive, but give less reliable results. CONCLUSION: The authors showed the possibilities of a comprehensive evaluation, described the problem of the lack of a single standard for investigation of the KJ function. A conclusion is made about the necessity to develop a software-hardware complex that maximally satisfies the criteria of objectivity, accessibility and quickness of use for evaluation of function of the KJ in OA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信