不平等的高度:一个政策视角

D. W. Rasmussen
{"title":"不平等的高度:一个政策视角","authors":"D. W. Rasmussen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3809144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Income households’ share of national income has grown dramatically since 1970 while the bottom 80 percent has seen their share decline. This paper examines economic, social, and demographic changes that almost assure that the income would be increasingly concentrated at the top. Occupations that dominate the top 1 percent of households nevertheless are getting unearned rents because corporate boards do not control executive compensation, medical, dental and law professions undermine competition, and a long-standing finance premium has favored that occupation. Progressivity of the tax code stops at an income level far below the $1.66 million average income for the top 1 percent of taxpayers. Higher taxes on top incomes can make the system fairer and the increased revenues can be devoted to programs that enhance economic growth and benefit lower income households.","PeriodicalId":448175,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Political Economy: Comparative Capitalism eJournal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Height of Inequality: A Policy Perspective\",\"authors\":\"D. W. Rasmussen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3809144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Income households’ share of national income has grown dramatically since 1970 while the bottom 80 percent has seen their share decline. This paper examines economic, social, and demographic changes that almost assure that the income would be increasingly concentrated at the top. Occupations that dominate the top 1 percent of households nevertheless are getting unearned rents because corporate boards do not control executive compensation, medical, dental and law professions undermine competition, and a long-standing finance premium has favored that occupation. Progressivity of the tax code stops at an income level far below the $1.66 million average income for the top 1 percent of taxpayers. Higher taxes on top incomes can make the system fairer and the increased revenues can be devoted to programs that enhance economic growth and benefit lower income households.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Political Economy: Comparative Capitalism eJournal\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Political Economy: Comparative Capitalism eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3809144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Political Economy: Comparative Capitalism eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3809144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自1970年以来,收入家庭在国民收入中所占的份额急剧增长,而收入最低的80%的家庭所占的份额却在下降。本文考察了经济、社会和人口结构的变化,这些变化几乎可以肯定,收入将越来越集中在最顶层。然而,收入最高的1%的家庭所从事的职业却得到了不劳而获的租金,因为公司董事会不控制高管薪酬,医疗、牙科和法律行业削弱了竞争,而且长期以来金融溢价一直有利于这些职业。税法的累进性止于远低于收入最高的1%纳税人166万美元的平均收入水平。对高收入者增税可以使制度更加公平,增加的收入可以用于促进经济增长和惠及低收入家庭的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Height of Inequality: A Policy Perspective
Income households’ share of national income has grown dramatically since 1970 while the bottom 80 percent has seen their share decline. This paper examines economic, social, and demographic changes that almost assure that the income would be increasingly concentrated at the top. Occupations that dominate the top 1 percent of households nevertheless are getting unearned rents because corporate boards do not control executive compensation, medical, dental and law professions undermine competition, and a long-standing finance premium has favored that occupation. Progressivity of the tax code stops at an income level far below the $1.66 million average income for the top 1 percent of taxpayers. Higher taxes on top incomes can make the system fairer and the increased revenues can be devoted to programs that enhance economic growth and benefit lower income households.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信