重复共识的快速算法

Fatemeh Borran, Martin Hutle, Nuno Santos, A. Schiper
{"title":"重复共识的快速算法","authors":"Fatemeh Borran, Martin Hutle, Nuno Santos, A. Schiper","doi":"10.1109/SRDS.2010.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We introduce the notion of a swift algorithm. Informally, an algorithm that solves the repeated consensus is swift if, in a partial synchronous run of this algorithm, eventually no timeout expires, i.e., the algorithm execution proceeds with the actual speed of the system. This definition differs from other efficiency criteria for partial synchronous systems. Furthermore, we show that the notion of swiftness explains why failure detector based algorithms are typically more efficient than round-based algorithms, since the former are naturally swift while the latter are naturally non-swift. We show that this is not an inherent difference between the models, and provide a round implementation that is swift, therefore performing similarly to failure detector algorithms while maintaining the advantages of the round model.","PeriodicalId":219204,"journal":{"name":"2010 29th IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Swift Algorithms for Repeated Consensus\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Borran, Martin Hutle, Nuno Santos, A. Schiper\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SRDS.2010.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We introduce the notion of a swift algorithm. Informally, an algorithm that solves the repeated consensus is swift if, in a partial synchronous run of this algorithm, eventually no timeout expires, i.e., the algorithm execution proceeds with the actual speed of the system. This definition differs from other efficiency criteria for partial synchronous systems. Furthermore, we show that the notion of swiftness explains why failure detector based algorithms are typically more efficient than round-based algorithms, since the former are naturally swift while the latter are naturally non-swift. We show that this is not an inherent difference between the models, and provide a round implementation that is swift, therefore performing similarly to failure detector algorithms while maintaining the advantages of the round model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":219204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 29th IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 29th IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SRDS.2010.18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 29th IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SRDS.2010.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们引入了快速算法的概念。非正式地说,解决重复共识的算法是快速的,如果在该算法的部分同步运行中,最终没有超时,即算法执行以系统的实际速度进行。这个定义不同于部分同步系统的其他效率标准。此外,我们证明了快速的概念解释了为什么基于故障检测器的算法通常比基于轮的算法更有效,因为前者自然是快速的,而后者自然是不快速的。我们证明了这不是模型之间的固有差异,并提供了一个快速的轮实现,因此在保持轮模型的优点的同时执行类似于故障检测器算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Swift Algorithms for Repeated Consensus
We introduce the notion of a swift algorithm. Informally, an algorithm that solves the repeated consensus is swift if, in a partial synchronous run of this algorithm, eventually no timeout expires, i.e., the algorithm execution proceeds with the actual speed of the system. This definition differs from other efficiency criteria for partial synchronous systems. Furthermore, we show that the notion of swiftness explains why failure detector based algorithms are typically more efficient than round-based algorithms, since the former are naturally swift while the latter are naturally non-swift. We show that this is not an inherent difference between the models, and provide a round implementation that is swift, therefore performing similarly to failure detector algorithms while maintaining the advantages of the round model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信