内生工资不平等的供给侧最优资本税收

Xiaoyong Cui, L. Gong, Wenjian Li
{"title":"内生工资不平等的供给侧最优资本税收","authors":"Xiaoyong Cui, L. Gong, Wenjian Li","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3829706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In a model with a continuum of imperfectly substitutable laborers and endogenous skill premiums, this paper derives optimal tax formulas as functions of social welfare weights and a small set of estimable statistics. It first demonstrates that differential capital tax, based on capital’s effect on skill premiums, is desirable even in the steady state, while nonlinear capital tax is not desirable under an additively separable utility function. It then explores both uniform and sector-specific capital income tax (UCIT and SCIT), with a sector corresponding to a type of laborer. Numerical application to U.S. taxation delivers an inverted U-shaped relationship between the SCIT rate and sectoral wage. The optimal SCIT rate on the top-income sectors increases with the elasticity of substitution between the sectoral products and amounts to a net return tax of 45.9 % . Reform from UCIT to SCIT compresses wage gaps between the top ten percent and others considerably. It especially favors the median-income individuals whose wages are increased as high as 3.8 % . Due to production inefficiency, switching from UCIT to SCIT implies small welfare gains ( 0.07 % ~ 0.22 % in consumption-equivalent terms).","PeriodicalId":431495,"journal":{"name":"Public Economics: Taxation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supply-side Optimal Capital Taxation with Endogenous Wage Inequality\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyong Cui, L. Gong, Wenjian Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3829706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In a model with a continuum of imperfectly substitutable laborers and endogenous skill premiums, this paper derives optimal tax formulas as functions of social welfare weights and a small set of estimable statistics. It first demonstrates that differential capital tax, based on capital’s effect on skill premiums, is desirable even in the steady state, while nonlinear capital tax is not desirable under an additively separable utility function. It then explores both uniform and sector-specific capital income tax (UCIT and SCIT), with a sector corresponding to a type of laborer. Numerical application to U.S. taxation delivers an inverted U-shaped relationship between the SCIT rate and sectoral wage. The optimal SCIT rate on the top-income sectors increases with the elasticity of substitution between the sectoral products and amounts to a net return tax of 45.9 % . Reform from UCIT to SCIT compresses wage gaps between the top ten percent and others considerably. It especially favors the median-income individuals whose wages are increased as high as 3.8 % . Due to production inefficiency, switching from UCIT to SCIT implies small welfare gains ( 0.07 % ~ 0.22 % in consumption-equivalent terms).\",\"PeriodicalId\":431495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Economics: Taxation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Economics: Taxation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3829706\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Economics: Taxation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3829706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要在具有不完全可替代劳动力和内生技能溢价连续体的模型中,导出了社会福利权重和一小组可估计统计量的函数的最优税收公式。首先,基于资本对技能溢价的影响,差分资本税即使在稳定状态下也是可取的,而非线性资本税在可加性可分离效用函数下是不可取的。然后,它探讨了统一和特定部门的资本所得税(UCIT和SCIT),一个部门对应于一种劳动者。对美国税收的数值应用表明,企业所得税税率与行业工资之间存在倒u型关系。最高收入部门的最佳工商及科技税税率随着部门产品之间替代弹性的增加而增加,相当于45.9%的净回报税。从UCIT到sciit的改革大大压缩了前10%和其他人之间的工资差距。这尤其有利于工资增幅高达3.8%的中等收入人群。由于生产效率低下,从UCIT转向sciit意味着很小的福利收益(按消费当量计算为0.07% ~ 0.22%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supply-side Optimal Capital Taxation with Endogenous Wage Inequality
Abstract In a model with a continuum of imperfectly substitutable laborers and endogenous skill premiums, this paper derives optimal tax formulas as functions of social welfare weights and a small set of estimable statistics. It first demonstrates that differential capital tax, based on capital’s effect on skill premiums, is desirable even in the steady state, while nonlinear capital tax is not desirable under an additively separable utility function. It then explores both uniform and sector-specific capital income tax (UCIT and SCIT), with a sector corresponding to a type of laborer. Numerical application to U.S. taxation delivers an inverted U-shaped relationship between the SCIT rate and sectoral wage. The optimal SCIT rate on the top-income sectors increases with the elasticity of substitution between the sectoral products and amounts to a net return tax of 45.9 % . Reform from UCIT to SCIT compresses wage gaps between the top ten percent and others considerably. It especially favors the median-income individuals whose wages are increased as high as 3.8 % . Due to production inefficiency, switching from UCIT to SCIT implies small welfare gains ( 0.07 % ~ 0.22 % in consumption-equivalent terms).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信