“伯拉纠主义”的发明:动机与手段

A. Bonner
{"title":"“伯拉纠主义”的发明:动机与手段","authors":"A. Bonner","doi":"10.5871/bacad/9780197266397.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The motive for the invention of ‘Pelagianism’ was to install as dogma the doctrines of original sin, an absolute account of prevenient grace, and predestination interpreted as preordainment. The means by which this was attempted included the official condemnation of Pelagius, which attached a label of heresy to him, destroying his reputation, and was achieved by political means. The chapter offers discussion of relevant insights from interactionist theory, and both individual case studies of heresy accusations as well as broad comparative studies of heresy. Further, it analyses how the myth of ‘Pelagianism’ gained traction, examining the political and ecclesiastical crises that enabled the myth to take root.","PeriodicalId":344041,"journal":{"name":"The Myth of Pelagianism","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Invention of ‘Pelagianism’: Motive and Means\",\"authors\":\"A. Bonner\",\"doi\":\"10.5871/bacad/9780197266397.003.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The motive for the invention of ‘Pelagianism’ was to install as dogma the doctrines of original sin, an absolute account of prevenient grace, and predestination interpreted as preordainment. The means by which this was attempted included the official condemnation of Pelagius, which attached a label of heresy to him, destroying his reputation, and was achieved by political means. The chapter offers discussion of relevant insights from interactionist theory, and both individual case studies of heresy accusations as well as broad comparative studies of heresy. Further, it analyses how the myth of ‘Pelagianism’ gained traction, examining the political and ecclesiastical crises that enabled the myth to take root.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Myth of Pelagianism\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Myth of Pelagianism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197266397.003.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Myth of Pelagianism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197266397.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

发明"伯拉纠主义"的动机是将原罪理论,对先前恩典的绝对解释,以及将宿命论解释为宿命论,奉为教条。这一企图的手段包括正式谴责伯拉纠,给他贴上异端的标签,破坏他的声誉,并通过政治手段实现。本章讨论了互动论理论的相关见解,以及对异端指控的个别案例研究以及对异端的广泛比较研究。此外,它还分析了“伯拉纠主义”的神话是如何获得牵引力的,并考察了使神话扎根的政治和教会危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Invention of ‘Pelagianism’: Motive and Means
The motive for the invention of ‘Pelagianism’ was to install as dogma the doctrines of original sin, an absolute account of prevenient grace, and predestination interpreted as preordainment. The means by which this was attempted included the official condemnation of Pelagius, which attached a label of heresy to him, destroying his reputation, and was achieved by political means. The chapter offers discussion of relevant insights from interactionist theory, and both individual case studies of heresy accusations as well as broad comparative studies of heresy. Further, it analyses how the myth of ‘Pelagianism’ gained traction, examining the political and ecclesiastical crises that enabled the myth to take root.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信