{"title":"“伯拉纠主义”的发明:动机与手段","authors":"A. Bonner","doi":"10.5871/bacad/9780197266397.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The motive for the invention of ‘Pelagianism’ was to install as dogma the doctrines of original sin, an absolute account of prevenient grace, and predestination interpreted as preordainment. The means by which this was attempted included the official condemnation of Pelagius, which attached a label of heresy to him, destroying his reputation, and was achieved by political means. The chapter offers discussion of relevant insights from interactionist theory, and both individual case studies of heresy accusations as well as broad comparative studies of heresy. Further, it analyses how the myth of ‘Pelagianism’ gained traction, examining the political and ecclesiastical crises that enabled the myth to take root.","PeriodicalId":344041,"journal":{"name":"The Myth of Pelagianism","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Invention of ‘Pelagianism’: Motive and Means\",\"authors\":\"A. Bonner\",\"doi\":\"10.5871/bacad/9780197266397.003.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The motive for the invention of ‘Pelagianism’ was to install as dogma the doctrines of original sin, an absolute account of prevenient grace, and predestination interpreted as preordainment. The means by which this was attempted included the official condemnation of Pelagius, which attached a label of heresy to him, destroying his reputation, and was achieved by political means. The chapter offers discussion of relevant insights from interactionist theory, and both individual case studies of heresy accusations as well as broad comparative studies of heresy. Further, it analyses how the myth of ‘Pelagianism’ gained traction, examining the political and ecclesiastical crises that enabled the myth to take root.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Myth of Pelagianism\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Myth of Pelagianism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197266397.003.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Myth of Pelagianism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197266397.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The motive for the invention of ‘Pelagianism’ was to install as dogma the doctrines of original sin, an absolute account of prevenient grace, and predestination interpreted as preordainment. The means by which this was attempted included the official condemnation of Pelagius, which attached a label of heresy to him, destroying his reputation, and was achieved by political means. The chapter offers discussion of relevant insights from interactionist theory, and both individual case studies of heresy accusations as well as broad comparative studies of heresy. Further, it analyses how the myth of ‘Pelagianism’ gained traction, examining the political and ecclesiastical crises that enabled the myth to take root.