谁的战争,哪场战争?

C. Davis
{"title":"谁的战争,哪场战争?","authors":"C. Davis","doi":"10.5949/liverpool/9781786940421.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conclusion returns to the theoretical issues which crystallize around traumatic hermeneutics. The path to finding what is unspoken in an utterance may be hazardous, presumptuous, and beset by the possibility of overreading and error. This does not make it avoidable or redundant, or any less important.","PeriodicalId":422175,"journal":{"name":"Traces of War","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whose War, Which War?\",\"authors\":\"C. Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.5949/liverpool/9781786940421.003.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The conclusion returns to the theoretical issues which crystallize around traumatic hermeneutics. The path to finding what is unspoken in an utterance may be hazardous, presumptuous, and beset by the possibility of overreading and error. This does not make it avoidable or redundant, or any less important.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traces of War\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traces of War\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5949/liverpool/9781786940421.003.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traces of War","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5949/liverpool/9781786940421.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结论回归到围绕创伤解释学的理论问题。寻找话语中未言说的东西的道路可能是危险的,自以为是的,并被过度阅读和错误的可能性所困扰。这并不意味着它可以避免或多余,或者不那么重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Whose War, Which War?
The conclusion returns to the theoretical issues which crystallize around traumatic hermeneutics. The path to finding what is unspoken in an utterance may be hazardous, presumptuous, and beset by the possibility of overreading and error. This does not make it avoidable or redundant, or any less important.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信