TRIZ方法的数学基础

K. Ariyur
{"title":"TRIZ方法的数学基础","authors":"K. Ariyur","doi":"10.1109/SYSCON.2011.5929117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TRIZ methods were developed in the erstwhile Soviet Union by Genrikh Altshuller and his students. Many proponents claim that their methods make creativity an exact science, something not conceded by others. We analyze two of the most widely used TRIZ methods here—the resolution of ‘contradictions’ and idealization in the context of optimization and decision theory. We first show that the resolution of contradictions helps improve system design through providing additional design flexibility. We also show how idealization directs system configuration so as to avoid or minimize side-effects or externalities, and therefore trade-offs and risks. We illustrate these issues in the context of a tablet counting problem.","PeriodicalId":109868,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE International Systems Conference","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mathematical foundation for TRIZ methods\",\"authors\":\"K. Ariyur\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SYSCON.2011.5929117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"TRIZ methods were developed in the erstwhile Soviet Union by Genrikh Altshuller and his students. Many proponents claim that their methods make creativity an exact science, something not conceded by others. We analyze two of the most widely used TRIZ methods here—the resolution of ‘contradictions’ and idealization in the context of optimization and decision theory. We first show that the resolution of contradictions helps improve system design through providing additional design flexibility. We also show how idealization directs system configuration so as to avoid or minimize side-effects or externalities, and therefore trade-offs and risks. We illustrate these issues in the context of a tablet counting problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":109868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE International Systems Conference\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE International Systems Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSCON.2011.5929117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE International Systems Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSCON.2011.5929117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

TRIZ方法是由Genrikh Altshuller和他的学生在前苏联开发的。许多支持者声称,他们的方法使创造力成为一门精确的科学,这是其他人不承认的。我们在这里分析了两种最广泛使用的TRIZ方法——在优化和决策理论的背景下解决“矛盾”和理想化。我们首先表明,通过提供额外的设计灵活性,矛盾的解决有助于改进系统设计。我们还展示了理想化如何指导系统配置,以避免或最小化副作用或外部性,从而减少权衡和风险。我们在平板电脑计数问题的背景下说明这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A mathematical foundation for TRIZ methods
TRIZ methods were developed in the erstwhile Soviet Union by Genrikh Altshuller and his students. Many proponents claim that their methods make creativity an exact science, something not conceded by others. We analyze two of the most widely used TRIZ methods here—the resolution of ‘contradictions’ and idealization in the context of optimization and decision theory. We first show that the resolution of contradictions helps improve system design through providing additional design flexibility. We also show how idealization directs system configuration so as to avoid or minimize side-effects or externalities, and therefore trade-offs and risks. We illustrate these issues in the context of a tablet counting problem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信