配偶提供非正式照护能力对长期照护使用的影响

P. Bakx, Claudine de Meijer
{"title":"配偶提供非正式照护能力对长期照护使用的影响","authors":"P. Bakx, Claudine de Meijer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2407926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Informal care substitutes for or postpones formal long-term care (LTC) use, especially in the Netherlands, where informal care supply affects eligibility for public LTC. The effect of potential informal care supply within the household has received less attention. We examine the role of spouse’s physical ability to provide informal care in explaining LTC use and transitions.Method: We used Dutch respondents from waves 1 and 2 of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. A mixed multinomial logit regression is used to model the choice between no LTC use, informal LTC use only, and formal LTC use. Transitions into formal care use are modeled with a logit regression.Results: Spouse ability affects LTC use but living alone remains important after controlling for spouse ability. Other important determinants of use are having a child , age, disability and health status. Transitions are explained by informal care supply and changes therein, health and disability and the respondent’s age. Discussion: Spouse ability to provide informal care reduces use of formal LTC, which implies that future compression of morbidity/disability and its impact would lower demand for LTC, directly and through increased spouse ability to provide informal care.","PeriodicalId":117887,"journal":{"name":"NursingRN: Long-Term Care (Sub-Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of Spouse Ability to Provide Informal Care on Long-Term Care Use\",\"authors\":\"P. Bakx, Claudine de Meijer\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2407926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Informal care substitutes for or postpones formal long-term care (LTC) use, especially in the Netherlands, where informal care supply affects eligibility for public LTC. The effect of potential informal care supply within the household has received less attention. We examine the role of spouse’s physical ability to provide informal care in explaining LTC use and transitions.Method: We used Dutch respondents from waves 1 and 2 of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. A mixed multinomial logit regression is used to model the choice between no LTC use, informal LTC use only, and formal LTC use. Transitions into formal care use are modeled with a logit regression.Results: Spouse ability affects LTC use but living alone remains important after controlling for spouse ability. Other important determinants of use are having a child , age, disability and health status. Transitions are explained by informal care supply and changes therein, health and disability and the respondent’s age. Discussion: Spouse ability to provide informal care reduces use of formal LTC, which implies that future compression of morbidity/disability and its impact would lower demand for LTC, directly and through increased spouse ability to provide informal care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NursingRN: Long-Term Care (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NursingRN: Long-Term Care (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2407926\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NursingRN: Long-Term Care (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2407926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的:非正式护理替代或推迟了正式长期护理(LTC)的使用,特别是在荷兰,非正式护理供应影响了公共长期护理的资格。家庭内部潜在的非正式护理供应的影响受到的关注较少。我们研究了配偶提供非正式照顾的身体能力在解释LTC使用和过渡中的作用。方法:我们使用了来自欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查第一和第二波的荷兰受访者。混合多项logit回归用于对不使用LTC、仅使用非正式LTC和使用正式LTC之间的选择进行建模。过渡到正规护理使用的模型与logit回归。结果:配偶能力对LTC使用有影响,但在控制配偶能力后,独居仍有影响。其他使用的重要决定因素是是否有子女、年龄、残疾和健康状况。过渡可以用非正式护理供应及其变化、健康和残疾以及答复者的年龄来解释。讨论:配偶提供非正式护理的能力减少了正式长期护理的使用,这意味着未来发病率/残疾的压缩及其影响将降低对长期护理的需求,直接或通过增加配偶提供非正式护理的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Influence of Spouse Ability to Provide Informal Care on Long-Term Care Use
Objective: Informal care substitutes for or postpones formal long-term care (LTC) use, especially in the Netherlands, where informal care supply affects eligibility for public LTC. The effect of potential informal care supply within the household has received less attention. We examine the role of spouse’s physical ability to provide informal care in explaining LTC use and transitions.Method: We used Dutch respondents from waves 1 and 2 of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. A mixed multinomial logit regression is used to model the choice between no LTC use, informal LTC use only, and formal LTC use. Transitions into formal care use are modeled with a logit regression.Results: Spouse ability affects LTC use but living alone remains important after controlling for spouse ability. Other important determinants of use are having a child , age, disability and health status. Transitions are explained by informal care supply and changes therein, health and disability and the respondent’s age. Discussion: Spouse ability to provide informal care reduces use of formal LTC, which implies that future compression of morbidity/disability and its impact would lower demand for LTC, directly and through increased spouse ability to provide informal care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信