商誉会计和收购溢价:在国际财务报告准则之前和之后

M. Bugeja, Anna Loyeung
{"title":"商誉会计和收购溢价:在国际财务报告准则之前和之后","authors":"M. Bugeja, Anna Loyeung","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1941459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior US research indicates that acquiring firms pay an additional premium in acquisitions (i.e., pooling transactions) in which they do not need to amortise goodwill. The results of these studies however are subject to endogeneity problems as the accounting method choice and takeover premiums are jointly determined. As Australia has never permitted a choice of the pooling method, this study is able to take advantage of Australia’s adoption of IFRS in 2005 to examine the relationship between goodwill accounting and takeover premiums without concerns regarding endogeneity. Our results show that bidding firms lower their takeover premium when there is greater target firm goodwill. This relationship however is eliminated after Australia adopted IFRS and no longer required goodwill amortisation. Furthermore, we show that this change in the relationship between takeover premiums and goodwill post- IFRS only exists for bidding firms that have a CEO accounting based performance plan in place.","PeriodicalId":246130,"journal":{"name":"FIRN (Financial Research Network) Research Paper Series","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Goodwill Accounting and Takeover Premiums: Pre- and Post-IFRS\",\"authors\":\"M. Bugeja, Anna Loyeung\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1941459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prior US research indicates that acquiring firms pay an additional premium in acquisitions (i.e., pooling transactions) in which they do not need to amortise goodwill. The results of these studies however are subject to endogeneity problems as the accounting method choice and takeover premiums are jointly determined. As Australia has never permitted a choice of the pooling method, this study is able to take advantage of Australia’s adoption of IFRS in 2005 to examine the relationship between goodwill accounting and takeover premiums without concerns regarding endogeneity. Our results show that bidding firms lower their takeover premium when there is greater target firm goodwill. This relationship however is eliminated after Australia adopted IFRS and no longer required goodwill amortisation. Furthermore, we show that this change in the relationship between takeover premiums and goodwill post- IFRS only exists for bidding firms that have a CEO accounting based performance plan in place.\",\"PeriodicalId\":246130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FIRN (Financial Research Network) Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FIRN (Financial Research Network) Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1941459\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FIRN (Financial Research Network) Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1941459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

美国先前的研究表明,收购公司在不需要摊销商誉的收购(即集中交易)中支付额外的溢价。然而,由于会计方法选择和收购溢价是共同确定的,这些研究的结果受到内生性问题的影响。由于澳大利亚从未允许选择合并方法,本研究能够利用澳大利亚在2005年采用的国际财务报告准则来检验商誉会计与收购溢价之间的关系,而无需担心内生性。研究结果表明,当目标企业商誉较高时,投标企业会降低收购溢价。然而,在澳大利亚采用国际财务报告准则后,这种关系被消除,不再需要商誉摊销。此外,我们表明,收购溢价与商誉之间关系的这种变化仅存在于拥有基于CEO会计的绩效计划的投标公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Goodwill Accounting and Takeover Premiums: Pre- and Post-IFRS
Prior US research indicates that acquiring firms pay an additional premium in acquisitions (i.e., pooling transactions) in which they do not need to amortise goodwill. The results of these studies however are subject to endogeneity problems as the accounting method choice and takeover premiums are jointly determined. As Australia has never permitted a choice of the pooling method, this study is able to take advantage of Australia’s adoption of IFRS in 2005 to examine the relationship between goodwill accounting and takeover premiums without concerns regarding endogeneity. Our results show that bidding firms lower their takeover premium when there is greater target firm goodwill. This relationship however is eliminated after Australia adopted IFRS and no longer required goodwill amortisation. Furthermore, we show that this change in the relationship between takeover premiums and goodwill post- IFRS only exists for bidding firms that have a CEO accounting based performance plan in place.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信