治疗性拥塞管理中保证(N-1)-安全的先进优化算法

J. Mehlem, Christian Gerdon, A. Moser
{"title":"治疗性拥塞管理中保证(N-1)-安全的先进优化算法","authors":"J. Mehlem, Christian Gerdon, A. Moser","doi":"10.1109/FES57669.2023.10182579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The introduction of nonlinear power flow controlling remedial actions and curative congestion management (CCM) increases the complexity of congestion management. State of the Art linearization approaches in the optimization of CCM can lead to violations of (n-1)-security not identified by algorithms based on linearization. This paper investigates the impact of exact outage simulations based on AC load flow equations and outage approximations based on linearization on the violation of (n-1)-security and computational effort in the optimization of CCM. Exemplary results show that exact outage simulations based on AC load flow calculation guarantee (n-1)-security at the cost of extreme computational effort. Outage approximations based on linearization can greatly reduce the computational effort, but can lead to violations of (n-1)-security by up to 7 %. Therefore, this paper introduces an advanced centralized algorithm combining linearized outage and exact outage calculations. The results show that the advanced centralized algorithm ensures (n-1)-security while increasing the computational effort in comparison to outage approximations by only a factor of between 39 % and 65 %.","PeriodicalId":165790,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Future Energy Solutions (FES)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advanced Optimization Algorithm to Guarantee (N-1)-Security in Curative Congestion Management\",\"authors\":\"J. Mehlem, Christian Gerdon, A. Moser\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FES57669.2023.10182579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The introduction of nonlinear power flow controlling remedial actions and curative congestion management (CCM) increases the complexity of congestion management. State of the Art linearization approaches in the optimization of CCM can lead to violations of (n-1)-security not identified by algorithms based on linearization. This paper investigates the impact of exact outage simulations based on AC load flow equations and outage approximations based on linearization on the violation of (n-1)-security and computational effort in the optimization of CCM. Exemplary results show that exact outage simulations based on AC load flow calculation guarantee (n-1)-security at the cost of extreme computational effort. Outage approximations based on linearization can greatly reduce the computational effort, but can lead to violations of (n-1)-security by up to 7 %. Therefore, this paper introduces an advanced centralized algorithm combining linearized outage and exact outage calculations. The results show that the advanced centralized algorithm ensures (n-1)-security while increasing the computational effort in comparison to outage approximations by only a factor of between 39 % and 65 %.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 International Conference on Future Energy Solutions (FES)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 International Conference on Future Energy Solutions (FES)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FES57669.2023.10182579\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Future Energy Solutions (FES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FES57669.2023.10182579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非线性潮流控制补救措施和治疗性拥塞管理(CCM)的引入增加了拥塞管理的复杂性。目前的线性化方法在CCM优化中可能导致违反(n-1)-安全性,而基于线性化的算法无法识别。本文研究了基于交流潮流方程的精确停电模拟和基于线性化的停电近似对CCM优化中违反(n-1)安全性和计算量的影响。示例结果表明,基于交流潮流计算的精确停电模拟以极大的计算工作量为代价保证了(n-1)-安全性。基于线性化的停机近似可以大大减少计算工作量,但可能导致违反(n-1)-安全性高达7%。因此,本文引入了一种先进的集中算法,将线性化停机和精确停机计算相结合。结果表明,先进的集中式算法在保证(n-1)安全性的同时,与中断近似相比,只增加了39%到65%的计算工作量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advanced Optimization Algorithm to Guarantee (N-1)-Security in Curative Congestion Management
The introduction of nonlinear power flow controlling remedial actions and curative congestion management (CCM) increases the complexity of congestion management. State of the Art linearization approaches in the optimization of CCM can lead to violations of (n-1)-security not identified by algorithms based on linearization. This paper investigates the impact of exact outage simulations based on AC load flow equations and outage approximations based on linearization on the violation of (n-1)-security and computational effort in the optimization of CCM. Exemplary results show that exact outage simulations based on AC load flow calculation guarantee (n-1)-security at the cost of extreme computational effort. Outage approximations based on linearization can greatly reduce the computational effort, but can lead to violations of (n-1)-security by up to 7 %. Therefore, this paper introduces an advanced centralized algorithm combining linearized outage and exact outage calculations. The results show that the advanced centralized algorithm ensures (n-1)-security while increasing the computational effort in comparison to outage approximations by only a factor of between 39 % and 65 %.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信