协同设计中沟通内容分析的自然语言处理

Sachin H. Lokesh, Ashish M. Chaudhari, J. Thekinen, Jitesh H. Panchal
{"title":"协同设计中沟通内容分析的自然语言处理","authors":"Sachin H. Lokesh, Ashish M. Chaudhari, J. Thekinen, Jitesh H. Panchal","doi":"10.1115/detc2022-90895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We address the problem of content analysis in text-based engineering design communication. Existing methods to characterize communication content in engineering design are manual or qualitative, which is tedious for large datasets. We formulate the characterization of communication messages as an intent classification task. We identify two intents — Intent 1 captures the presence and flow of information, Intent 2 captures specific topics about design parameters and objectives. We compare the predictive accuracy of convolutional LSTM, character-based convolutional LSTM, XLNet, and BERT models for the intent classification task. The results of our comparison show that the XL-Net model predicts Intents 1 and 2 with 88% and 81% accuracy, respectively, on text data collected from 40 teams in a design experiment with university students. We analyze the differences in communication patterns between high- and low-performing teams. Time-series studies show that high-performing teams have more responsive communication and a higher consistency of information exchange.","PeriodicalId":382970,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: 42nd Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (CIE)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Natural Language Processing for Content Analysis of Communication in Collaborative Design\",\"authors\":\"Sachin H. Lokesh, Ashish M. Chaudhari, J. Thekinen, Jitesh H. Panchal\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/detc2022-90895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We address the problem of content analysis in text-based engineering design communication. Existing methods to characterize communication content in engineering design are manual or qualitative, which is tedious for large datasets. We formulate the characterization of communication messages as an intent classification task. We identify two intents — Intent 1 captures the presence and flow of information, Intent 2 captures specific topics about design parameters and objectives. We compare the predictive accuracy of convolutional LSTM, character-based convolutional LSTM, XLNet, and BERT models for the intent classification task. The results of our comparison show that the XL-Net model predicts Intents 1 and 2 with 88% and 81% accuracy, respectively, on text data collected from 40 teams in a design experiment with university students. We analyze the differences in communication patterns between high- and low-performing teams. Time-series studies show that high-performing teams have more responsive communication and a higher consistency of information exchange.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 2: 42nd Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (CIE)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 2: 42nd Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (CIE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2022-90895\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: 42nd Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (CIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2022-90895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们解决了基于文本的工程设计交流中的内容分析问题。现有的描述工程设计中通信内容的方法是手工或定性的,这对于大数据集来说是繁琐的。我们将通信消息的表征表述为意图分类任务。我们确定了两个意图——意图1捕获了信息的存在和流动,意图2捕获了关于设计参数和目标的特定主题。我们比较了卷积LSTM、基于字符的卷积LSTM、XLNet和BERT模型对意图分类任务的预测精度。我们的比较结果表明,xml - net模型预测意图1和意图2的准确率分别为88%和81%,这些数据来自大学生设计实验中的40个团队。我们分析了高绩效和低绩效团队之间沟通模式的差异。时间序列研究表明,高绩效团队的沟通反应更迅速,信息交换的一致性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Natural Language Processing for Content Analysis of Communication in Collaborative Design
We address the problem of content analysis in text-based engineering design communication. Existing methods to characterize communication content in engineering design are manual or qualitative, which is tedious for large datasets. We formulate the characterization of communication messages as an intent classification task. We identify two intents — Intent 1 captures the presence and flow of information, Intent 2 captures specific topics about design parameters and objectives. We compare the predictive accuracy of convolutional LSTM, character-based convolutional LSTM, XLNet, and BERT models for the intent classification task. The results of our comparison show that the XL-Net model predicts Intents 1 and 2 with 88% and 81% accuracy, respectively, on text data collected from 40 teams in a design experiment with university students. We analyze the differences in communication patterns between high- and low-performing teams. Time-series studies show that high-performing teams have more responsive communication and a higher consistency of information exchange.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信