不同塔角下两种轮毂风洞倾转旋翼载荷的多体动力学比较

Jennifer Baggett, Andrew R. Kreshock, Jinwei Shen
{"title":"不同塔角下两种轮毂风洞倾转旋翼载荷的多体动力学比较","authors":"Jennifer Baggett, Andrew R. Kreshock, Jinwei Shen","doi":"10.4050/f-0077-2021-16759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Loads and harmonics calculations for a wind tunnel tiltrotor model built by the U.S. Army are presented. Blade loads are calculated using the comprehensive analysis, CAMRAD II, and the multibody dynamics analysis, Dymore, for helicopter, airplane, and transition modes of flight at various velocity and pylon angles. These calculations were performed for both a gimballed hub and hingeless hub configurations. Mean variations show a primary trend along the radial station is consistent among both hub types. Half peak-to-peak comparisons show excellent agreement based on the analysis in helicopter and airplane mode. During transition flight some deviations occur within the hingeless hub type confiruation. The analytical vibratory blade loads generally match in waveforms for both the gimballed and hingeless hub configurations. Dymore and CAMRAD II show good agreement among the harmonics for both the gimballed and hingeless hub configurations with both the flapwise bending moment and chordwise bending moment cases relatively similar. Good agreement is identified particularly in airplane mode and higher flight speeds.\n","PeriodicalId":273020,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Wind Tunnel Tiltrotor Loads of Two Hub Types Under Different Pylon Angles with Multibody Dynamics Analyses \",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Baggett, Andrew R. Kreshock, Jinwei Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.4050/f-0077-2021-16759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Loads and harmonics calculations for a wind tunnel tiltrotor model built by the U.S. Army are presented. Blade loads are calculated using the comprehensive analysis, CAMRAD II, and the multibody dynamics analysis, Dymore, for helicopter, airplane, and transition modes of flight at various velocity and pylon angles. These calculations were performed for both a gimballed hub and hingeless hub configurations. Mean variations show a primary trend along the radial station is consistent among both hub types. Half peak-to-peak comparisons show excellent agreement based on the analysis in helicopter and airplane mode. During transition flight some deviations occur within the hingeless hub type confiruation. The analytical vibratory blade loads generally match in waveforms for both the gimballed and hingeless hub configurations. Dymore and CAMRAD II show good agreement among the harmonics for both the gimballed and hingeless hub configurations with both the flapwise bending moment and chordwise bending moment cases relatively similar. Good agreement is identified particularly in airplane mode and higher flight speeds.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":273020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4050/f-0077-2021-16759\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4050/f-0077-2021-16759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

介绍了美国陆军所建风洞倾转旋翼模型的载荷和谐波计算。利用综合分析软件CAMRAD II和多体动力学分析软件Dymore,对直升机、飞机和不同速度和挂架角度下的过渡飞行模式进行叶片载荷计算。这些计算执行了两个万向节轮毂和无铰轮毂配置。两种轮毂类型沿径向站的平均变化趋势一致。基于直升机和飞机模式的分析,半峰对峰比较显示出极好的一致性。在过渡飞行中,在无铰轮毂类型确认中出现一些偏差。分析的振动叶片载荷通常在波形上与万向轮和无铰链轮毂结构相匹配。Dymore和CAMRAD II的结果表明,在颤振弯矩和弦向弯矩情况比较相似的情况下,有万向节和无铰轮毂构型的谐波之间具有较好的一致性。特别是在飞行模式和更高的飞行速度下,一致性很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Wind Tunnel Tiltrotor Loads of Two Hub Types Under Different Pylon Angles with Multibody Dynamics Analyses 
Loads and harmonics calculations for a wind tunnel tiltrotor model built by the U.S. Army are presented. Blade loads are calculated using the comprehensive analysis, CAMRAD II, and the multibody dynamics analysis, Dymore, for helicopter, airplane, and transition modes of flight at various velocity and pylon angles. These calculations were performed for both a gimballed hub and hingeless hub configurations. Mean variations show a primary trend along the radial station is consistent among both hub types. Half peak-to-peak comparisons show excellent agreement based on the analysis in helicopter and airplane mode. During transition flight some deviations occur within the hingeless hub type confiruation. The analytical vibratory blade loads generally match in waveforms for both the gimballed and hingeless hub configurations. Dymore and CAMRAD II show good agreement among the harmonics for both the gimballed and hingeless hub configurations with both the flapwise bending moment and chordwise bending moment cases relatively similar. Good agreement is identified particularly in airplane mode and higher flight speeds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信