负向互惠倾向对工人行为的影响:来自养老金权利缩减的证据

R. Montizaan, A. Grip, F. Cörvers, Thomas Dohmen
{"title":"负向互惠倾向对工人行为的影响:来自养老金权利缩减的证据","authors":"R. Montizaan, A. Grip, F. Cörvers, Thomas Dohmen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2731651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We document that the strength of negatively reciprocal inclinations affects workers’ reaction to unfair treatment. We exploit unique matched survey and administrative data on male public sector employees in the Netherlands and compare the job motivation of employees born in 1950, who faced a substantial retrenchment of their pension rights resulting from a pension reform in 2006, to that of slightly older employees who remained entitled to more generous pension benefits. Job motivation is significantly lower among negatively reciprocal employees who were affected by the reform. The adverse effect on job motivation is stronger for negative reciprocal employees born very shortly after the cutoff date of January 1, 1950, as well as for those with many unaffected colleagues, who perceive the policy change as being more unfair. The treatment effect is stronger among workers who are more likely to hold their employer accountable for the drop in their pension rights.Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2157 . This paper was accepted by Uri Gneezy, behavioral economics .","PeriodicalId":357131,"journal":{"name":"Netspar Research Paper Series","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Negatively Reciprocal Inclinations on Worker Behavior: Evidence from a Retrenchment of Pension Rights\",\"authors\":\"R. Montizaan, A. Grip, F. Cörvers, Thomas Dohmen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2731651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We document that the strength of negatively reciprocal inclinations affects workers’ reaction to unfair treatment. We exploit unique matched survey and administrative data on male public sector employees in the Netherlands and compare the job motivation of employees born in 1950, who faced a substantial retrenchment of their pension rights resulting from a pension reform in 2006, to that of slightly older employees who remained entitled to more generous pension benefits. Job motivation is significantly lower among negatively reciprocal employees who were affected by the reform. The adverse effect on job motivation is stronger for negative reciprocal employees born very shortly after the cutoff date of January 1, 1950, as well as for those with many unaffected colleagues, who perceive the policy change as being more unfair. The treatment effect is stronger among workers who are more likely to hold their employer accountable for the drop in their pension rights.Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2157 . This paper was accepted by Uri Gneezy, behavioral economics .\",\"PeriodicalId\":357131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Netspar Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Netspar Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2731651\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netspar Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2731651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

我们证明,消极互惠倾向的强度影响工人对不公平待遇的反应。我们利用了荷兰公共部门男性雇员的独特匹配调查和行政数据,并比较了1950年出生的员工的工作动机,这些员工因2006年的养老金改革而面临养老金权利的大幅缩减,而稍微年长的员工仍然有权获得更慷慨的养老金福利。受改革影响的负互惠员工的工作动机显著降低。对于在1950年1月1日截止日期之后不久出生的负互惠员工,以及那些有许多未受影响的同事,他们认为政策变化更不公平,对工作动机的不利影响更大。在那些更有可能要求雇主对其养老金权利下降负责的工人中,这种待遇效果更强。作为补充资料的数据可在http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2157上获得。这篇论文被行为经济学的Uri Gneezy接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Negatively Reciprocal Inclinations on Worker Behavior: Evidence from a Retrenchment of Pension Rights
We document that the strength of negatively reciprocal inclinations affects workers’ reaction to unfair treatment. We exploit unique matched survey and administrative data on male public sector employees in the Netherlands and compare the job motivation of employees born in 1950, who faced a substantial retrenchment of their pension rights resulting from a pension reform in 2006, to that of slightly older employees who remained entitled to more generous pension benefits. Job motivation is significantly lower among negatively reciprocal employees who were affected by the reform. The adverse effect on job motivation is stronger for negative reciprocal employees born very shortly after the cutoff date of January 1, 1950, as well as for those with many unaffected colleagues, who perceive the policy change as being more unfair. The treatment effect is stronger among workers who are more likely to hold their employer accountable for the drop in their pension rights.Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2157 . This paper was accepted by Uri Gneezy, behavioral economics .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信