尿培养分离肠球菌种类及抗生素耐药率

I. Bahceci, S. Yildiz, K. Şahin
{"title":"尿培养分离肠球菌种类及抗生素耐药率","authors":"I. Bahceci, S. Yildiz, K. Şahin","doi":"10.54584/lms.2023.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While enterococci are found as flora elements in many parts of the body, they have recently emerged as different infectious agents such as urinary tract infections, bacteremia, and meningitis. Increasing antibiotic resistance also poses additional challenges in treatment. In this study, it was aimed to determine the species identification and antibiotic resistance rates of enterococci isolated from the urinary tract. Enterococcus strains isolated from urine culture samples sent to the routine microbiology laboratory from various clinics of our hospital between 01.01.2020 and 31.12.2021 with the preliminary diagnosis of urinary tract infection were included in this study. Samples were cultivated on sheep blood agar and eosin methylene blue agar, and species determination and antibiogram evaluation were carried out in accordance with the recommendations of EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing-2020-2021) using conventional methods and automated identification device (VITEK 2 Compact-BioMerieux-France). All enterococci isolates (n=349) were susceptible to vancomycin, teicoplanin, tigecycline and linezolid. Of Enterococcus faecalis isolates (n=238), 32.8% were resistant to ciprofloxacin, 23.7% to high-level gentamicin, 33.2% to imipenem, 2.5% to nitrofurantoin, and 26.9% to streptomycin. Of the Enterococcus faecium isolates (n=111), 84.7% were resistant to ciprofloxacin, 58.6% to high-level gentamicin, 91% to imipenem, 31.5% to nitrofurantoin, and 83.8% to streptomycin. In conclusion, it is important to determine the resistance patterns of enterococcus strains, which are most frequently isolated as the causative agent of urinary tract infection, and also cause other clinical presentations such as wound infection or bacteremia, and to establish appropriate treatment protocols and to determine new antibiotic resistances.","PeriodicalId":344016,"journal":{"name":"Life and Medical Sciences","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enterococcus Species Isolated from Urine Cultures and Antibiotic Resistance Rates\",\"authors\":\"I. Bahceci, S. Yildiz, K. Şahin\",\"doi\":\"10.54584/lms.2023.29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While enterococci are found as flora elements in many parts of the body, they have recently emerged as different infectious agents such as urinary tract infections, bacteremia, and meningitis. Increasing antibiotic resistance also poses additional challenges in treatment. In this study, it was aimed to determine the species identification and antibiotic resistance rates of enterococci isolated from the urinary tract. Enterococcus strains isolated from urine culture samples sent to the routine microbiology laboratory from various clinics of our hospital between 01.01.2020 and 31.12.2021 with the preliminary diagnosis of urinary tract infection were included in this study. Samples were cultivated on sheep blood agar and eosin methylene blue agar, and species determination and antibiogram evaluation were carried out in accordance with the recommendations of EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing-2020-2021) using conventional methods and automated identification device (VITEK 2 Compact-BioMerieux-France). All enterococci isolates (n=349) were susceptible to vancomycin, teicoplanin, tigecycline and linezolid. Of Enterococcus faecalis isolates (n=238), 32.8% were resistant to ciprofloxacin, 23.7% to high-level gentamicin, 33.2% to imipenem, 2.5% to nitrofurantoin, and 26.9% to streptomycin. Of the Enterococcus faecium isolates (n=111), 84.7% were resistant to ciprofloxacin, 58.6% to high-level gentamicin, 91% to imipenem, 31.5% to nitrofurantoin, and 83.8% to streptomycin. In conclusion, it is important to determine the resistance patterns of enterococcus strains, which are most frequently isolated as the causative agent of urinary tract infection, and also cause other clinical presentations such as wound infection or bacteremia, and to establish appropriate treatment protocols and to determine new antibiotic resistances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Life and Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Life and Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54584/lms.2023.29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54584/lms.2023.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然肠球菌作为菌群元素存在于身体的许多部位,但它们最近作为不同的感染性病原体出现,如尿路感染、菌血症和脑膜炎。抗生素耐药性的增加也给治疗带来了额外的挑战。本研究旨在确定尿路分离肠球菌的种类鉴定和耐药性。本研究纳入从2020年1月1日至2021年12月31日我院各门诊送至常规微生物实验室的尿液培养标本中分离到的初步诊断为尿路感染的肠球菌。样品在羊血琼脂和伊红亚甲基蓝琼脂上培养,采用常规方法和自动鉴定装置(VITEK 2 Compact-BioMerieux-France),按照EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing-2020-2021)的建议进行菌种测定和抗生素谱评估。所有肠球菌分离株(n=349)对万古霉素、替柯planin、替加环素和利奈唑胺敏感。238株粪肠球菌对环丙沙星耐药32.8%,对高剂量庆大霉素耐药23.7%,对亚胺培南耐药33.2%,对呋喃妥英耐药2.5%,对链霉素耐药26.9%。在111株粪肠球菌中,84.7%对环丙沙星耐药,58.6%对高剂量庆大霉素耐药,91%对亚胺培南耐药,31.5%对呋喃妥英耐药,83.8%对链霉素耐药。总之,确定肠球菌菌株的耐药模式非常重要,肠球菌菌株最常被分离为尿路感染的病原体,也会引起其他临床表现,如伤口感染或菌血症,并建立适当的治疗方案并确定新的抗生素耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enterococcus Species Isolated from Urine Cultures and Antibiotic Resistance Rates
While enterococci are found as flora elements in many parts of the body, they have recently emerged as different infectious agents such as urinary tract infections, bacteremia, and meningitis. Increasing antibiotic resistance also poses additional challenges in treatment. In this study, it was aimed to determine the species identification and antibiotic resistance rates of enterococci isolated from the urinary tract. Enterococcus strains isolated from urine culture samples sent to the routine microbiology laboratory from various clinics of our hospital between 01.01.2020 and 31.12.2021 with the preliminary diagnosis of urinary tract infection were included in this study. Samples were cultivated on sheep blood agar and eosin methylene blue agar, and species determination and antibiogram evaluation were carried out in accordance with the recommendations of EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing-2020-2021) using conventional methods and automated identification device (VITEK 2 Compact-BioMerieux-France). All enterococci isolates (n=349) were susceptible to vancomycin, teicoplanin, tigecycline and linezolid. Of Enterococcus faecalis isolates (n=238), 32.8% were resistant to ciprofloxacin, 23.7% to high-level gentamicin, 33.2% to imipenem, 2.5% to nitrofurantoin, and 26.9% to streptomycin. Of the Enterococcus faecium isolates (n=111), 84.7% were resistant to ciprofloxacin, 58.6% to high-level gentamicin, 91% to imipenem, 31.5% to nitrofurantoin, and 83.8% to streptomycin. In conclusion, it is important to determine the resistance patterns of enterococcus strains, which are most frequently isolated as the causative agent of urinary tract infection, and also cause other clinical presentations such as wound infection or bacteremia, and to establish appropriate treatment protocols and to determine new antibiotic resistances.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信