{"title":"行动和预防的义务:根据STF在MP nº966/2020的合宪性判决中确立的论点进行分析","authors":"Eduardo Fernandes","doi":"10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article has for object the parameterization undertaken by the thesis fixed by the STF as to what is a gross error in the context of public policies developed to face the sanitary and economic developments of the Civid-19 pandemic. In turn, the objective is to debate how the established thesis tend to be interpreted considering of the STF's jurisprudence regarding the application of the precautionary principle.","PeriodicalId":346094,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dever de agir e precaução: uma análise à luz da tese fixada no julgamento de constitucionalidade da MP nº 966/2020 pelo STF\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Fernandes\",\"doi\":\"10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article has for object the parameterization undertaken by the thesis fixed by the STF as to what is a gross error in the context of public policies developed to face the sanitary and economic developments of the Civid-19 pandemic. In turn, the objective is to debate how the established thesis tend to be interpreted considering of the STF's jurisprudence regarding the application of the precautionary principle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dever de agir e precaução: uma análise à luz da tese fixada no julgamento de constitucionalidade da MP nº 966/2020 pelo STF
This article has for object the parameterization undertaken by the thesis fixed by the STF as to what is a gross error in the context of public policies developed to face the sanitary and economic developments of the Civid-19 pandemic. In turn, the objective is to debate how the established thesis tend to be interpreted considering of the STF's jurisprudence regarding the application of the precautionary principle.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
