在Lukasiewicz逻辑中寻找可满足性的硬实例

Miquel Bofill, F. Manyà, Amanda Vidal, Mateu Villaret
{"title":"在Lukasiewicz逻辑中寻找可满足性的硬实例","authors":"Miquel Bofill, F. Manyà, Amanda Vidal, Mateu Villaret","doi":"10.1109/ISMVL.2015.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One aspect that has been poorly studied in multiple-valued logics, and in particular in Lukasiewicz logics, is the generation of instances of varying difficulty for evaluating, comparing and improving satisfiability solvers. In this paper we present a new class of clausal forms, called Lukasiewicz (L-)clausal forms, motivate their usefulness, study their complexity, and report on an empirical investigation that shows an easy-hard-easy pattern and a phase transition phenomenon when testing the satisfiability of L-clausal forms.","PeriodicalId":118417,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finding Hard Instances of Satisfiability in Lukasiewicz Logics\",\"authors\":\"Miquel Bofill, F. Manyà, Amanda Vidal, Mateu Villaret\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISMVL.2015.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One aspect that has been poorly studied in multiple-valued logics, and in particular in Lukasiewicz logics, is the generation of instances of varying difficulty for evaluating, comparing and improving satisfiability solvers. In this paper we present a new class of clausal forms, called Lukasiewicz (L-)clausal forms, motivate their usefulness, study their complexity, and report on an empirical investigation that shows an easy-hard-easy pattern and a phase transition phenomenon when testing the satisfiability of L-clausal forms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMVL.2015.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMVL.2015.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

在多值逻辑中,特别是在Lukasiewicz逻辑中,研究得很少的一个方面是产生不同难度的实例来评估、比较和改进可满足性求解器。在本文中,我们提出了一类新的子句形式,称为Lukasiewicz (L-)子句形式,激发了它们的有用性,研究了它们的复杂性,并报告了一项实证调查,该调查显示了在测试L-子句形式的可满足性时的易-难-易模式和相变现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Finding Hard Instances of Satisfiability in Lukasiewicz Logics
One aspect that has been poorly studied in multiple-valued logics, and in particular in Lukasiewicz logics, is the generation of instances of varying difficulty for evaluating, comparing and improving satisfiability solvers. In this paper we present a new class of clausal forms, called Lukasiewicz (L-)clausal forms, motivate their usefulness, study their complexity, and report on an empirical investigation that shows an easy-hard-easy pattern and a phase transition phenomenon when testing the satisfiability of L-clausal forms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信