{"title":"运气好坏参半","authors":"R. Peels","doi":"10.4324/9781351258760-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On two earlier occasions, I have spelled out and defended what, henceforth, I call a Mixed Account of luck. 1 It is mixed because it combines the conditions of two main rival accounts of luck: the control condition and the modal condition. Moreover, it also has a significance condition (see Peels 2015: 77–79; 2017: 200–207). Since my account had to be sketchy on those earlier occasions, I am glad that the editors have invited me to spell out my view in more detail, contrast it with various other accounts, and defend it against objections.","PeriodicalId":158662,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy and Psychology of Luck","volume":"167 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Mixed Account of Luck\",\"authors\":\"R. Peels\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781351258760-14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On two earlier occasions, I have spelled out and defended what, henceforth, I call a Mixed Account of luck. 1 It is mixed because it combines the conditions of two main rival accounts of luck: the control condition and the modal condition. Moreover, it also has a significance condition (see Peels 2015: 77–79; 2017: 200–207). Since my account had to be sketchy on those earlier occasions, I am glad that the editors have invited me to spell out my view in more detail, contrast it with various other accounts, and defend it against objections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy and Psychology of Luck\",\"volume\":\"167 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy and Psychology of Luck\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351258760-14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy and Psychology of Luck","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351258760-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On two earlier occasions, I have spelled out and defended what, henceforth, I call a Mixed Account of luck. 1 It is mixed because it combines the conditions of two main rival accounts of luck: the control condition and the modal condition. Moreover, it also has a significance condition (see Peels 2015: 77–79; 2017: 200–207). Since my account had to be sketchy on those earlier occasions, I am glad that the editors have invited me to spell out my view in more detail, contrast it with various other accounts, and defend it against objections.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
