应用于基础设施项目的实物期权:一种评估和管理风险和灵活性的新方法

C. van Rhee, M. Pieters, M.P. van de Voort
{"title":"应用于基础设施项目的实物期权:一种评估和管理风险和灵活性的新方法","authors":"C. van Rhee, M. Pieters, M.P. van de Voort","doi":"10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Infrastructure projects are subject to internal and external uncertainties. Being able to anticipate to uncertainties within a project and manage them adds value to the business case. Although it is commonly used to evaluate projects, the Net Present Value (NPV) method is unable to determine the added value of managing risk and flexibility. Real Options (RO), a method originating from financial markets, gives management a tool to value flexibility and risk in infrastructure projects. Literature provides several examples on how to value options or execute a Real Options analysis. However, the majority of these examples fails to incorporate all opportunities offered by RO to include options and/or ways to reduce uncertainty. This paper presents twelve opportunities that should be considered to minimise the risk of a project and increase the flexibility of the project during its lifetime. This checklist is based on practical experience with project evaluations and could be used as a starting point to list alternatives that should be evaluated. Including a wider set of alternatives in an evaluation has substantial benefits and may lead to different decisions.","PeriodicalId":207041,"journal":{"name":"2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real Options applied to infrastructure projects: A new approach to value and manage risk and flexibility\",\"authors\":\"C. van Rhee, M. Pieters, M.P. van de Voort\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Infrastructure projects are subject to internal and external uncertainties. Being able to anticipate to uncertainties within a project and manage them adds value to the business case. Although it is commonly used to evaluate projects, the Net Present Value (NPV) method is unable to determine the added value of managing risk and flexibility. Real Options (RO), a method originating from financial markets, gives management a tool to value flexibility and risk in infrastructure projects. Literature provides several examples on how to value options or execute a Real Options analysis. However, the majority of these examples fails to incorporate all opportunities offered by RO to include options and/or ways to reduce uncertainty. This paper presents twelve opportunities that should be considered to minimise the risk of a project and increase the flexibility of the project during its lifetime. This checklist is based on practical experience with project evaluations and could be used as a starting point to list alternatives that should be evaluated. Including a wider set of alternatives in an evaluation has substantial benefits and may lead to different decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":207041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439633\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

基础设施项目受到内部和外部不确定性的影响。能够预测项目中的不确定性并对其进行管理可以为业务案例增加价值。净现值法(NPV)通常用于评估项目,但它无法确定管理风险和灵活性的附加价值。实物期权(Real Options, RO)是一种起源于金融市场的方法,为基础设施项目的管理提供了一种评估灵活性和风险的工具。文献提供了几个关于如何评估期权或执行实物期权分析的例子。然而,这些例子中的大多数没有纳入RO提供的所有机会,包括减少不确定性的选择和/或方法。本文提出了12个应该考虑的机会,以尽量减少项目的风险,并增加项目在其生命周期内的灵活性。这份清单是基于项目评估的实际经验,可以作为一个起点,列出应该评估的备选方案。在评估中纳入更广泛的备选方案具有实质性的好处,并可能导致不同的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real Options applied to infrastructure projects: A new approach to value and manage risk and flexibility
Infrastructure projects are subject to internal and external uncertainties. Being able to anticipate to uncertainties within a project and manage them adds value to the business case. Although it is commonly used to evaluate projects, the Net Present Value (NPV) method is unable to determine the added value of managing risk and flexibility. Real Options (RO), a method originating from financial markets, gives management a tool to value flexibility and risk in infrastructure projects. Literature provides several examples on how to value options or execute a Real Options analysis. However, the majority of these examples fails to incorporate all opportunities offered by RO to include options and/or ways to reduce uncertainty. This paper presents twelve opportunities that should be considered to minimise the risk of a project and increase the flexibility of the project during its lifetime. This checklist is based on practical experience with project evaluations and could be used as a starting point to list alternatives that should be evaluated. Including a wider set of alternatives in an evaluation has substantial benefits and may lead to different decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信