基于局部视图数据的三维物体识别

Ronald Wu, H. Stark
{"title":"基于局部视图数据的三维物体识别","authors":"Ronald Wu, H. Stark","doi":"10.1364/srs.1986.thd2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider a problem that occurs in machine vision research, namely, how to determine the class membership of an object when only partial view data about it is available. For example, suppose that a machine vision system must determine whether a physical (i.e., a three-dimensional) object belongs to class A or class B and only 90 degree view data is available. How should the data be organized into a useful feature vector? What rule should be used to determine class—membership? One way to proceed is via image recovery i.e., the restoration of missing view data using any of the several extrapolation algorithms known to the image recovery community. However if only class membership is desired, is image recovery really needed? First we note that if the partial view data is insufficient i.e, it contains no information that is not common to both classes, then image recovery will not work (now for that matter will anything else!). Second, assuming that the data is sufficient i.e., that it contains at least some data characteristic of only one class, image recovery may not be the answer for two reasons: 1) the recovery process is most-often ill-posed, thereby introducing possibly too much noise for subsequent discrimination; and 2) regularization may induce sufficient smoothing to destroy what little class-differentiability may exist in the partial data. Thus we concentrate on information recovery rather than image recovery. We are therefore led to the following problem statement: given partial view data of a 3-D object known to belong to one of M well-defined classes, what operation (linear or non-linear) will enhance the discriminating value of the data? The algorithm we have derived is based on the ful1-view algorithm described below.","PeriodicalId":262149,"journal":{"name":"Topical Meeting On Signal Recovery and Synthesis II","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recognition of 3-D Objects from Partial View Data\",\"authors\":\"Ronald Wu, H. Stark\",\"doi\":\"10.1364/srs.1986.thd2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider a problem that occurs in machine vision research, namely, how to determine the class membership of an object when only partial view data about it is available. For example, suppose that a machine vision system must determine whether a physical (i.e., a three-dimensional) object belongs to class A or class B and only 90 degree view data is available. How should the data be organized into a useful feature vector? What rule should be used to determine class—membership? One way to proceed is via image recovery i.e., the restoration of missing view data using any of the several extrapolation algorithms known to the image recovery community. However if only class membership is desired, is image recovery really needed? First we note that if the partial view data is insufficient i.e, it contains no information that is not common to both classes, then image recovery will not work (now for that matter will anything else!). Second, assuming that the data is sufficient i.e., that it contains at least some data characteristic of only one class, image recovery may not be the answer for two reasons: 1) the recovery process is most-often ill-posed, thereby introducing possibly too much noise for subsequent discrimination; and 2) regularization may induce sufficient smoothing to destroy what little class-differentiability may exist in the partial data. Thus we concentrate on information recovery rather than image recovery. We are therefore led to the following problem statement: given partial view data of a 3-D object known to belong to one of M well-defined classes, what operation (linear or non-linear) will enhance the discriminating value of the data? The algorithm we have derived is based on the ful1-view algorithm described below.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topical Meeting On Signal Recovery and Synthesis II\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topical Meeting On Signal Recovery and Synthesis II\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1364/srs.1986.thd2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topical Meeting On Signal Recovery and Synthesis II","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1364/srs.1986.thd2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们考虑了机器视觉研究中出现的一个问题,即当只有关于对象的部分视图数据可用时,如何确定对象的类隶属关系。例如,假设机器视觉系统必须确定物理(即三维)对象是属于a类还是B类,并且只有90度视图数据可用。如何将数据组织成有用的特征向量?应该使用什么规则来确定类成员?一种方法是通过图像恢复,即使用图像恢复界已知的几种外推算法中的任何一种来恢复缺失的视图数据。但是,如果只需要类成员,那么真的需要图像恢复吗?首先,我们注意到,如果部分视图数据不足,也就是说,它不包含两个类不通用的信息,那么图像恢复将无法工作(现在对于这个问题将会有其他任何事情!)。其次,假设数据是足够的,即它至少包含一个类别的一些数据特征,图像恢复可能不是答案,原因有两个:1)恢复过程通常是病态的,从而可能引入过多的噪声,不利于后续的识别;2)正则化可以产生足够的平滑来破坏部分数据中可能存在的少量类可微性。因此,我们专注于信息恢复而不是图像恢复。因此,我们被引导到以下问题陈述:给定一个三维对象的部分视图数据,已知属于M个定义良好的类之一,什么操作(线性或非线性)将增强数据的鉴别值?我们推导的算法是基于下面描述的ful1-view算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recognition of 3-D Objects from Partial View Data
We consider a problem that occurs in machine vision research, namely, how to determine the class membership of an object when only partial view data about it is available. For example, suppose that a machine vision system must determine whether a physical (i.e., a three-dimensional) object belongs to class A or class B and only 90 degree view data is available. How should the data be organized into a useful feature vector? What rule should be used to determine class—membership? One way to proceed is via image recovery i.e., the restoration of missing view data using any of the several extrapolation algorithms known to the image recovery community. However if only class membership is desired, is image recovery really needed? First we note that if the partial view data is insufficient i.e, it contains no information that is not common to both classes, then image recovery will not work (now for that matter will anything else!). Second, assuming that the data is sufficient i.e., that it contains at least some data characteristic of only one class, image recovery may not be the answer for two reasons: 1) the recovery process is most-often ill-posed, thereby introducing possibly too much noise for subsequent discrimination; and 2) regularization may induce sufficient smoothing to destroy what little class-differentiability may exist in the partial data. Thus we concentrate on information recovery rather than image recovery. We are therefore led to the following problem statement: given partial view data of a 3-D object known to belong to one of M well-defined classes, what operation (linear or non-linear) will enhance the discriminating value of the data? The algorithm we have derived is based on the ful1-view algorithm described below.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信