Atena Shahkolaei, Azeddine Beghdadi, S. Al-Maadeed, M. Cheriet
{"title":"MHDID:一个多失真历史文档图像数据库","authors":"Atena Shahkolaei, Azeddine Beghdadi, S. Al-Maadeed, M. Cheriet","doi":"10.1109/ASAR.2018.8480372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a new dataset, called Multi-distortion Historical Document Image Database (MHDID), to be used for the research on quality assessment of degraded documents and degradation classification is proposed. The MHDID dataset contains 335 historical document images which are classified into four categories based on their distortion types, namely, paper translucency, stain, readers’ annotations and worn holes. A total of 36 subjects participated to judge the quality of ancient document images. Pair comparison rating (PCR) is utilized as a subjective rating method for evaluating the visual quality of degraded document images. For each distortion image a mean opinion score (MOS) value is computed. This dataset could be used for evaluating the image quality assessment (IQA) measures as well as in the design of new metrics.","PeriodicalId":165564,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 2nd International Workshop on Arabic and Derived Script Analysis and Recognition (ASAR)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MHDID: A Multi-distortion Historical Document Image Database\",\"authors\":\"Atena Shahkolaei, Azeddine Beghdadi, S. Al-Maadeed, M. Cheriet\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASAR.2018.8480372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, a new dataset, called Multi-distortion Historical Document Image Database (MHDID), to be used for the research on quality assessment of degraded documents and degradation classification is proposed. The MHDID dataset contains 335 historical document images which are classified into four categories based on their distortion types, namely, paper translucency, stain, readers’ annotations and worn holes. A total of 36 subjects participated to judge the quality of ancient document images. Pair comparison rating (PCR) is utilized as a subjective rating method for evaluating the visual quality of degraded document images. For each distortion image a mean opinion score (MOS) value is computed. This dataset could be used for evaluating the image quality assessment (IQA) measures as well as in the design of new metrics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE 2nd International Workshop on Arabic and Derived Script Analysis and Recognition (ASAR)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE 2nd International Workshop on Arabic and Derived Script Analysis and Recognition (ASAR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASAR.2018.8480372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 2nd International Workshop on Arabic and Derived Script Analysis and Recognition (ASAR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASAR.2018.8480372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
MHDID: A Multi-distortion Historical Document Image Database
In this paper, a new dataset, called Multi-distortion Historical Document Image Database (MHDID), to be used for the research on quality assessment of degraded documents and degradation classification is proposed. The MHDID dataset contains 335 historical document images which are classified into four categories based on their distortion types, namely, paper translucency, stain, readers’ annotations and worn holes. A total of 36 subjects participated to judge the quality of ancient document images. Pair comparison rating (PCR) is utilized as a subjective rating method for evaluating the visual quality of degraded document images. For each distortion image a mean opinion score (MOS) value is computed. This dataset could be used for evaluating the image quality assessment (IQA) measures as well as in the design of new metrics.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
