2018年美国法学院排名

Cj Ryan, Brian L. Frye
{"title":"2018年美国法学院排名","authors":"Cj Ryan, Brian L. Frye","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3154111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2017, we published A Revealed-Preferences Ranking of Law Schools, which presented the first (intentionally) subjective ranking of law schools based on the revealed preferences of matriculating students. We created a subjective ranking system as an alternative to other law school rankings, which are objective, because their purpose is to tell prospective law students where to matriculate. Our “revealed-preferences” ranking is subjective, because its purpose is to ask where prospective law students choose to matriculate. In other words, objective rankings tell students what they should want, but our subjective ranking asks what students actually want. In this article, we altered our methodology to present a law school ranking based exclusively on the combined scores of the students in a school’s 2017 incoming class. We also compare this ranking to our previous ranking, as well as other objective ranking systems, and provide regional rankings of law schools.","PeriodicalId":402063,"journal":{"name":"Education Law eJournal","volume":"149 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 2018 Revealed-Preferences Ranking of Law Schools\",\"authors\":\"Cj Ryan, Brian L. Frye\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3154111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2017, we published A Revealed-Preferences Ranking of Law Schools, which presented the first (intentionally) subjective ranking of law schools based on the revealed preferences of matriculating students. We created a subjective ranking system as an alternative to other law school rankings, which are objective, because their purpose is to tell prospective law students where to matriculate. Our “revealed-preferences” ranking is subjective, because its purpose is to ask where prospective law students choose to matriculate. In other words, objective rankings tell students what they should want, but our subjective ranking asks what students actually want. In this article, we altered our methodology to present a law school ranking based exclusively on the combined scores of the students in a school’s 2017 incoming class. We also compare this ranking to our previous ranking, as well as other objective ranking systems, and provide regional rankings of law schools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"149 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3154111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3154111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2017年,我们发布了《法学院的显性偏好排名》,这是第一次(有意地)根据入学学生的显性偏好对法学院进行主观排名。我们创建了一个主观排名系统,作为其他法学院排名的替代,这些排名是客观的,因为它们的目的是告诉未来的法学院学生该上哪所大学。我们的“显示偏好”排名是主观的,因为它的目的是询问未来的法律专业学生选择在哪里入学。换句话说,客观排名告诉学生他们应该想要什么,但我们的主观排名问的是学生真正想要什么。在这篇文章中,我们改变了我们的方法,只根据一所学校2017年新生的综合分数来呈现法学院排名。我们还将这个排名与我们之前的排名以及其他客观排名系统进行比较,并提供法学院的地区排名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The 2018 Revealed-Preferences Ranking of Law Schools
In 2017, we published A Revealed-Preferences Ranking of Law Schools, which presented the first (intentionally) subjective ranking of law schools based on the revealed preferences of matriculating students. We created a subjective ranking system as an alternative to other law school rankings, which are objective, because their purpose is to tell prospective law students where to matriculate. Our “revealed-preferences” ranking is subjective, because its purpose is to ask where prospective law students choose to matriculate. In other words, objective rankings tell students what they should want, but our subjective ranking asks what students actually want. In this article, we altered our methodology to present a law school ranking based exclusively on the combined scores of the students in a school’s 2017 incoming class. We also compare this ranking to our previous ranking, as well as other objective ranking systems, and provide regional rankings of law schools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信