网络可靠性、容错性、可靠性、安全性、生存性:一个比较分析的框架

M. Al-Kuwaiti, N. Kyriakopoulos, S. Hussein
{"title":"网络可靠性、容错性、可靠性、安全性、生存性:一个比较分析的框架","authors":"M. Al-Kuwaiti, N. Kyriakopoulos, S. Hussein","doi":"10.1109/ICCES.2006.320462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A number of qualitative and quantitative terms are used to describe the performance of what has come to be known as information systems, networks or infrastructures. However, some of these terms either have overlapping meanings or contain ambiguities in their definitions presenting problems to those who attempt a rigorous evaluation of the performance of such systems. The phenomenon arises because the wide range of disciplines covered by the term information technology have developed their own distinct terminologies. This paper presents a systematic approach for determining common and complementary characteristics of five widely-used concepts, dependability, fault-tolerance, reliability, security, and survivability. The approach consists of comparing definitions, attributes, and evaluation measures for each of the five concepts and developing corresponding relations. Removing redundancies and clarifying ambiguities will help the mapping of broad user-specified requirements into objective performance parameters for analyzing and designing information infrastructures","PeriodicalId":261853,"journal":{"name":"2006 International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network Dependability, Fault-tolerance, Reliability, Security, Survivability: A Framework for Comparative Analysis\",\"authors\":\"M. Al-Kuwaiti, N. Kyriakopoulos, S. Hussein\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCES.2006.320462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A number of qualitative and quantitative terms are used to describe the performance of what has come to be known as information systems, networks or infrastructures. However, some of these terms either have overlapping meanings or contain ambiguities in their definitions presenting problems to those who attempt a rigorous evaluation of the performance of such systems. The phenomenon arises because the wide range of disciplines covered by the term information technology have developed their own distinct terminologies. This paper presents a systematic approach for determining common and complementary characteristics of five widely-used concepts, dependability, fault-tolerance, reliability, security, and survivability. The approach consists of comparing definitions, attributes, and evaluation measures for each of the five concepts and developing corresponding relations. Removing redundancies and clarifying ambiguities will help the mapping of broad user-specified requirements into objective performance parameters for analyzing and designing information infrastructures\",\"PeriodicalId\":261853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCES.2006.320462\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCES.2006.320462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

许多定性和定量术语被用来描述已被称为信息系统、网络或基础设施的性能。然而,其中一些术语的含义重叠,或者在定义中包含含糊之处,这给那些试图严格评估此类系统性能的人带来了问题。之所以出现这种现象,是因为术语“信息技术”所涵盖的广泛学科已经发展出了自己独特的术语。本文提出了一种系统的方法来确定五个广泛使用的概念:可靠性、容错性、可靠性、安全性和生存性的共同特征和互补特征。该方法包括比较五个概念的定义、属性和评价方法,并建立相应的关系。消除冗余和澄清歧义将有助于将广泛的用户指定需求映射为分析和设计信息基础结构的客观性能参数
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Network Dependability, Fault-tolerance, Reliability, Security, Survivability: A Framework for Comparative Analysis
A number of qualitative and quantitative terms are used to describe the performance of what has come to be known as information systems, networks or infrastructures. However, some of these terms either have overlapping meanings or contain ambiguities in their definitions presenting problems to those who attempt a rigorous evaluation of the performance of such systems. The phenomenon arises because the wide range of disciplines covered by the term information technology have developed their own distinct terminologies. This paper presents a systematic approach for determining common and complementary characteristics of five widely-used concepts, dependability, fault-tolerance, reliability, security, and survivability. The approach consists of comparing definitions, attributes, and evaluation measures for each of the five concepts and developing corresponding relations. Removing redundancies and clarifying ambiguities will help the mapping of broad user-specified requirements into objective performance parameters for analyzing and designing information infrastructures
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信