肺癌患者治疗模式的验证

Arturo Redondo, Belén Ríos-Sánchez, G. Vigueras, B. Otero, R. López, M. Torrente, Ernestina Menasalvas Ruiz, M. Provencio, A. R. González
{"title":"肺癌患者治疗模式的验证","authors":"Arturo Redondo, Belén Ríos-Sánchez, G. Vigueras, B. Otero, R. López, M. Torrente, Ernestina Menasalvas Ruiz, M. Provencio, A. R. González","doi":"10.1109/DSAA53316.2021.9564176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death. From the estimation of cases that will be in 2021, more than 230,000 new cases are expected to be of lung cancer patients, with an estimation of more than 131,000 deaths. Improving the survival rates or the patient's quality of life is partially covered by a common element: treatments. Collective knowledge about cancer treatment recommendations is typically included in clinical guidelines, intended to optimize patient care and assist clinicians in lung cancer treatment. These guidelines define a set of treatment paths, where recommendations depend on cancer disease aspects and individual features for a concrete patient. Although oncologists are expected to follow clinical guidelines, the inter and intrapatients' variability of response to the possible treatment combinations, makes it necessary to personalize different treatment-patterns on certain cases. Additionally, clinical guidelines are not frequently updated with new findings or lack a consistent methodology when they are frequently updated. For that reason, the analysis of patterns on both patients treated following the standard of care, or outside it, would allow to validate clinical guidelines and identify potential new treatment recommendations. In this work, we have analysed whether actual treatments prescribed to lung cancer patients follow clinical guidelines or not. Using a machine learning method that provides as output association rules (Apriori), we identify patterns based on cancer stage. These preliminary results show that treatments patterns found mostly match with clinical guidelines recommendations, validating the information included in the consulted guidelines.","PeriodicalId":129612,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 8th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Treatment Patterns Validation in Lung Cancer Patients\",\"authors\":\"Arturo Redondo, Belén Ríos-Sánchez, G. Vigueras, B. Otero, R. López, M. Torrente, Ernestina Menasalvas Ruiz, M. Provencio, A. R. González\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DSAA53316.2021.9564176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death. From the estimation of cases that will be in 2021, more than 230,000 new cases are expected to be of lung cancer patients, with an estimation of more than 131,000 deaths. Improving the survival rates or the patient's quality of life is partially covered by a common element: treatments. Collective knowledge about cancer treatment recommendations is typically included in clinical guidelines, intended to optimize patient care and assist clinicians in lung cancer treatment. These guidelines define a set of treatment paths, where recommendations depend on cancer disease aspects and individual features for a concrete patient. Although oncologists are expected to follow clinical guidelines, the inter and intrapatients' variability of response to the possible treatment combinations, makes it necessary to personalize different treatment-patterns on certain cases. Additionally, clinical guidelines are not frequently updated with new findings or lack a consistent methodology when they are frequently updated. For that reason, the analysis of patterns on both patients treated following the standard of care, or outside it, would allow to validate clinical guidelines and identify potential new treatment recommendations. In this work, we have analysed whether actual treatments prescribed to lung cancer patients follow clinical guidelines or not. Using a machine learning method that provides as output association rules (Apriori), we identify patterns based on cancer stage. These preliminary results show that treatments patterns found mostly match with clinical guidelines recommendations, validating the information included in the consulted guidelines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE 8th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA)\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE 8th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSAA53316.2021.9564176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 8th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSAA53316.2021.9564176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

肺癌是癌症死亡的主要原因。根据对2021年病例的估计,预计肺癌患者将新增23万多例,死亡人数估计将超过13.1万。提高生存率或病人的生活质量部分是由一个共同因素所覆盖的:治疗。关于癌症治疗建议的集体知识通常包括在临床指南中,旨在优化患者护理并协助临床医生进行肺癌治疗。这些指南定义了一套治疗途径,其中的建议取决于癌症疾病方面和具体患者的个体特征。尽管肿瘤学家应该遵循临床指南,但患者之间和患者内部对可能的治疗组合的反应的可变性使得有必要针对某些病例个性化不同的治疗模式。此外,临床指南不经常更新新发现,或者在经常更新时缺乏一致的方法。因此,对两名患者按照标准治疗或不按照标准治疗的模式进行分析,将有助于验证临床指南,并确定潜在的新治疗建议。在这项工作中,我们分析了肺癌患者的实际治疗是否遵循临床指南。使用提供作为输出关联规则(Apriori)的机器学习方法,我们根据癌症阶段识别模式。这些初步结果表明,发现的治疗模式大多与临床指南建议相符,验证了咨询指南中包含的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards Treatment Patterns Validation in Lung Cancer Patients
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death. From the estimation of cases that will be in 2021, more than 230,000 new cases are expected to be of lung cancer patients, with an estimation of more than 131,000 deaths. Improving the survival rates or the patient's quality of life is partially covered by a common element: treatments. Collective knowledge about cancer treatment recommendations is typically included in clinical guidelines, intended to optimize patient care and assist clinicians in lung cancer treatment. These guidelines define a set of treatment paths, where recommendations depend on cancer disease aspects and individual features for a concrete patient. Although oncologists are expected to follow clinical guidelines, the inter and intrapatients' variability of response to the possible treatment combinations, makes it necessary to personalize different treatment-patterns on certain cases. Additionally, clinical guidelines are not frequently updated with new findings or lack a consistent methodology when they are frequently updated. For that reason, the analysis of patterns on both patients treated following the standard of care, or outside it, would allow to validate clinical guidelines and identify potential new treatment recommendations. In this work, we have analysed whether actual treatments prescribed to lung cancer patients follow clinical guidelines or not. Using a machine learning method that provides as output association rules (Apriori), we identify patterns based on cancer stage. These preliminary results show that treatments patterns found mostly match with clinical guidelines recommendations, validating the information included in the consulted guidelines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信