企业社会责任与社会本体论:一个缺失但必要的环节。对公司的现实主义描述

Adalberto Arrigoni
{"title":"企业社会责任与社会本体论:一个缺失但必要的环节。对公司的现实主义描述","authors":"Adalberto Arrigoni","doi":"10.1108/S2043-905920180000012016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nPurpose \nThis chapter points out and tries to describe the (missing) link between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and social ontology/ontology of the firm. The author believes that this gap in the literature hinders the progress of CSR theoretical/empirical understanding and effectiveness; therefore, the following question is addressed: is a social theory-focused approach to the ontology of the firm relevant to CSR studies? While currently many disciplines are seeking to clarify CSR theory and practice, the role of social ontology has relatively been under-explored despite its foundational importance. \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \nThis chapter provides rationales for identifying a set of interrelated themes to be included in future research projects. A literature review is carried out, and further analysis and desk research can be drawn from the key notions identified. \n \n \nFindings \nThis viewpoint conceptual chapter suggests that social ontology can be an important subject of inquiry in order to bridge the existing gaps in CSR/Business Ethics studies. A possible conceptual agreement for a realist and social theory-focused approach to CSR is illustrated. \n \n \nResearch limitations/implications \nWhile encouraging more effort and commitment in this emerging and fascinating field, this chapter concentrates on some selected key aspects such as the meaning of corporate moral agency and the ontological status of social collectives (e.g. firms). \n \n \nPractical implications \nThis chapter lays the ground for future pilot exploratory research, and could be instructive for the construction of specific research methodologies/theoretical tools seeking to explore not so much the ways CSR is defined (indeed, there seems to be a broad consensus about it) but rather how CSR is socially constructed, implemented and carried out. \n \n \nSocial implications \nThis chapter can potentially help grow knowledge about the nexus between CSR, social ontology and the underlying metaphysical issues, thus facilitating a comprehensive inter-/multi-/pluri-disciplinary understanding and giving a contribution to the relevant ongoing scientific and practical debates. \n \n \nOriginality/value \nThis chapter, while uncovering and exploring the aforementioned novel connections, can enrich the study of CSR with respect to the current mainstream approaches, for example, stakeholder management and engagement, social accounting and reporting, socially responsible investment (SRI).","PeriodicalId":155807,"journal":{"name":"The Critical State of Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CSR and Social Ontology: A Missing, but Necessary Link. Towards a Realist Account of the Firm\",\"authors\":\"Adalberto Arrigoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/S2043-905920180000012016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\nPurpose \\nThis chapter points out and tries to describe the (missing) link between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and social ontology/ontology of the firm. The author believes that this gap in the literature hinders the progress of CSR theoretical/empirical understanding and effectiveness; therefore, the following question is addressed: is a social theory-focused approach to the ontology of the firm relevant to CSR studies? While currently many disciplines are seeking to clarify CSR theory and practice, the role of social ontology has relatively been under-explored despite its foundational importance. \\n \\n \\nDesign/methodology/approach \\nThis chapter provides rationales for identifying a set of interrelated themes to be included in future research projects. A literature review is carried out, and further analysis and desk research can be drawn from the key notions identified. \\n \\n \\nFindings \\nThis viewpoint conceptual chapter suggests that social ontology can be an important subject of inquiry in order to bridge the existing gaps in CSR/Business Ethics studies. A possible conceptual agreement for a realist and social theory-focused approach to CSR is illustrated. \\n \\n \\nResearch limitations/implications \\nWhile encouraging more effort and commitment in this emerging and fascinating field, this chapter concentrates on some selected key aspects such as the meaning of corporate moral agency and the ontological status of social collectives (e.g. firms). \\n \\n \\nPractical implications \\nThis chapter lays the ground for future pilot exploratory research, and could be instructive for the construction of specific research methodologies/theoretical tools seeking to explore not so much the ways CSR is defined (indeed, there seems to be a broad consensus about it) but rather how CSR is socially constructed, implemented and carried out. \\n \\n \\nSocial implications \\nThis chapter can potentially help grow knowledge about the nexus between CSR, social ontology and the underlying metaphysical issues, thus facilitating a comprehensive inter-/multi-/pluri-disciplinary understanding and giving a contribution to the relevant ongoing scientific and practical debates. \\n \\n \\nOriginality/value \\nThis chapter, while uncovering and exploring the aforementioned novel connections, can enrich the study of CSR with respect to the current mainstream approaches, for example, stakeholder management and engagement, social accounting and reporting, socially responsible investment (SRI).\",\"PeriodicalId\":155807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Critical State of Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Critical State of Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/S2043-905920180000012016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Critical State of Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S2043-905920180000012016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本章指出并试图描述企业社会责任(CSR)与企业社会本体论之间(缺失的)联系。作者认为,这一文献缺口阻碍了企业社会责任理论/实证认识和有效性的进步;因此,提出了以下问题:以社会理论为中心的企业本体论方法是否与企业社会责任研究相关?虽然目前许多学科都在寻求澄清企业社会责任的理论和实践,但社会本体论的作用尽管具有基础性的重要性,但相对而言尚未得到充分的探索。设计/方法/方法本章提供了确定一系列相关主题的基本原理,这些主题将包括在未来的研究项目中。文献综述进行,进一步的分析和案头研究可以从确定的关键概念。这一观点概念章节表明,社会本体论可以成为一个重要的研究主题,以弥合企业社会责任/商业道德研究中的现有差距。对现实主义和以社会理论为中心的企业社会责任方法可能达成的概念协议进行了说明。在鼓励更多的努力和承诺在这个新兴的和迷人的领域,本章集中在一些选定的关键方面,如企业道德代理的意义和社会集体(如企业)的本体论地位。本章为未来的试点探索性研究奠定了基础,并可能对构建特定的研究方法/理论工具具有指导意义,这些研究方法/理论工具试图探索的不是企业社会责任的定义方式(事实上,似乎对此已经达成了广泛的共识),而是企业社会责任是如何在社会上构建、实施和执行的。本章可能有助于加深对企业社会责任、社会本体论和潜在形而上学问题之间关系的认识,从而促进全面的跨/多/多学科理解,并为相关的科学和实践辩论做出贡献。本章在揭示和探索上述新联系的同时,可以丰富当前主流方法对企业社会责任的研究,例如利益相关者管理和参与、社会会计和报告、社会责任投资(SRI)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CSR and Social Ontology: A Missing, but Necessary Link. Towards a Realist Account of the Firm
Abstract Purpose This chapter points out and tries to describe the (missing) link between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and social ontology/ontology of the firm. The author believes that this gap in the literature hinders the progress of CSR theoretical/empirical understanding and effectiveness; therefore, the following question is addressed: is a social theory-focused approach to the ontology of the firm relevant to CSR studies? While currently many disciplines are seeking to clarify CSR theory and practice, the role of social ontology has relatively been under-explored despite its foundational importance. Design/methodology/approach This chapter provides rationales for identifying a set of interrelated themes to be included in future research projects. A literature review is carried out, and further analysis and desk research can be drawn from the key notions identified. Findings This viewpoint conceptual chapter suggests that social ontology can be an important subject of inquiry in order to bridge the existing gaps in CSR/Business Ethics studies. A possible conceptual agreement for a realist and social theory-focused approach to CSR is illustrated. Research limitations/implications While encouraging more effort and commitment in this emerging and fascinating field, this chapter concentrates on some selected key aspects such as the meaning of corporate moral agency and the ontological status of social collectives (e.g. firms). Practical implications This chapter lays the ground for future pilot exploratory research, and could be instructive for the construction of specific research methodologies/theoretical tools seeking to explore not so much the ways CSR is defined (indeed, there seems to be a broad consensus about it) but rather how CSR is socially constructed, implemented and carried out. Social implications This chapter can potentially help grow knowledge about the nexus between CSR, social ontology and the underlying metaphysical issues, thus facilitating a comprehensive inter-/multi-/pluri-disciplinary understanding and giving a contribution to the relevant ongoing scientific and practical debates. Originality/value This chapter, while uncovering and exploring the aforementioned novel connections, can enrich the study of CSR with respect to the current mainstream approaches, for example, stakeholder management and engagement, social accounting and reporting, socially responsible investment (SRI).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信