{"title":"一个世纪的忽视:约翰·亨利·纽曼和t·s·艾略特的《传统与个人才能》","authors":"L. Oser","doi":"10.1353/SLI.2016.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The unexpected obstacle to our juxtaposition of these two authors is that Newman does not answer that illustrious roll call, the index of Donald Gallup’s T. S. Eliot: A Bibliography. Eliot never devoted a single essay to him. What could be the cause of so protracted a silence? Certainly, it was not lack of familiarity. For three straight years, fall and winter, beginning in the fall of 1916, Eliot’s University of London Extension class on “Modern English Literature” devoted a week to Newman. The printed syllabus gives only a tantalizing glimpse of the proceedings: “His temperament, with regard to his change in religious attachment. Reasons for joining the Church of Rome. His thought. Style. Read: Apologia, Idea of a University.” (131)","PeriodicalId":390916,"journal":{"name":"Studies in the Literary Imagination","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Century of Neglect: John Henry Newman and T. S. Eliot's \\\"Tradition and the Individual Talent\\\"\",\"authors\":\"L. Oser\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/SLI.2016.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The unexpected obstacle to our juxtaposition of these two authors is that Newman does not answer that illustrious roll call, the index of Donald Gallup’s T. S. Eliot: A Bibliography. Eliot never devoted a single essay to him. What could be the cause of so protracted a silence? Certainly, it was not lack of familiarity. For three straight years, fall and winter, beginning in the fall of 1916, Eliot’s University of London Extension class on “Modern English Literature” devoted a week to Newman. The printed syllabus gives only a tantalizing glimpse of the proceedings: “His temperament, with regard to his change in religious attachment. Reasons for joining the Church of Rome. His thought. Style. Read: Apologia, Idea of a University.” (131)\",\"PeriodicalId\":390916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in the Literary Imagination\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in the Literary Imagination\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/SLI.2016.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in the Literary Imagination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/SLI.2016.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
我们将这两位作者并置的一个意想不到的障碍是,纽曼没有回答唐纳德·盖洛普(Donald Gallup)的《t·s·艾略特参考书目》(T. S. Eliot: A Bibliography)中那个著名的点名。艾略特从未为他写过一篇文章。是什么原因造成这么长时间的沉默呢?当然,这并不是不熟悉。从1916年秋天开始,艾略特在伦敦大学的“现代英国文学”扩展课上花了一个星期的时间来学习纽曼,这是连续三年的秋冬。印刷出来的教学大纲只给了我们一个诱人的一瞥:“他的性情,关于他对宗教信仰的改变。加入罗马教会的原因。他的思想。风格。阅读:《辩辞》,《大学理念》。”(131)
A Century of Neglect: John Henry Newman and T. S. Eliot's "Tradition and the Individual Talent"
The unexpected obstacle to our juxtaposition of these two authors is that Newman does not answer that illustrious roll call, the index of Donald Gallup’s T. S. Eliot: A Bibliography. Eliot never devoted a single essay to him. What could be the cause of so protracted a silence? Certainly, it was not lack of familiarity. For three straight years, fall and winter, beginning in the fall of 1916, Eliot’s University of London Extension class on “Modern English Literature” devoted a week to Newman. The printed syllabus gives only a tantalizing glimpse of the proceedings: “His temperament, with regard to his change in religious attachment. Reasons for joining the Church of Rome. His thought. Style. Read: Apologia, Idea of a University.” (131)