理解容器网络接口插件:设计考虑和性能

Shixiong Qi, Sameer G. Kulkarni, K. Ramakrishnan
{"title":"理解容器网络接口插件:设计考虑和性能","authors":"Shixiong Qi, Sameer G. Kulkarni, K. Ramakrishnan","doi":"10.1109/LANMAN49260.2020.9153266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kubernetes, an open-source container orchestration platform, has been widely adopted by cloud service providers (CSPs) for its advantages in simplifying container deployment, scalability and scheduling. Networking is one of the central components of Kubernetes, providing connectivity between different pods (group of containers) both within the same host and across hosts. To bootstrap Kubernetes networking, the Container Network Interface (CNI) provides a unified interface for the interaction between container runtimes. There are several CNI implementations, available as open-source ‘CNI plugins’. While they differ in functionality and performance, it is a challenge for a cloud provider to differentiate and choose the appropriate plugin for their environment. In this paper, we compare the various open source CNI plugins available from the community, qualitatively and through detailed quantitative measurements. With our experimental evaluation, we analyze the overheads and bottlenecks for each CNI plugin, as a result of the network model it implements, interaction with the host network protocol stack and the network policies implemented in iptables rules. The choice of the CNI plugin may also be based on whether intra-host or inter-host communication dominates.","PeriodicalId":431494,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Container Network Interface Plugins: Design Considerations and Performance\",\"authors\":\"Shixiong Qi, Sameer G. Kulkarni, K. Ramakrishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LANMAN49260.2020.9153266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Kubernetes, an open-source container orchestration platform, has been widely adopted by cloud service providers (CSPs) for its advantages in simplifying container deployment, scalability and scheduling. Networking is one of the central components of Kubernetes, providing connectivity between different pods (group of containers) both within the same host and across hosts. To bootstrap Kubernetes networking, the Container Network Interface (CNI) provides a unified interface for the interaction between container runtimes. There are several CNI implementations, available as open-source ‘CNI plugins’. While they differ in functionality and performance, it is a challenge for a cloud provider to differentiate and choose the appropriate plugin for their environment. In this paper, we compare the various open source CNI plugins available from the community, qualitatively and through detailed quantitative measurements. With our experimental evaluation, we analyze the overheads and bottlenecks for each CNI plugin, as a result of the network model it implements, interaction with the host network protocol stack and the network policies implemented in iptables rules. The choice of the CNI plugin may also be based on whether intra-host or inter-host communication dominates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LANMAN49260.2020.9153266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LANMAN49260.2020.9153266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

Kubernetes是一个开源的容器编排平台,由于其在简化容器部署、可扩展性和调度方面的优势,已被云服务提供商(csp)广泛采用。网络是Kubernetes的核心组件之一,在同一主机内和跨主机的不同pod(容器组)之间提供连接。为了引导Kubernetes联网,容器网络接口(Container Network Interface, CNI)为容器运行时之间的交互提供了统一的接口。有几个CNI实现,可以作为开源的“CNI插件”。虽然它们在功能和性能上有所不同,但对于云提供商来说,区分并选择适合其环境的插件是一项挑战。在本文中,我们通过定性和详细的定量测量,比较了社区提供的各种开源CNI插件。通过我们的实验评估,我们分析了每个CNI插件的开销和瓶颈,这是它实现的网络模型、与主机网络协议栈的交互以及在iptables规则中实现的网络策略的结果。CNI插件的选择也可能基于主机内或主机间通信占主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding Container Network Interface Plugins: Design Considerations and Performance
Kubernetes, an open-source container orchestration platform, has been widely adopted by cloud service providers (CSPs) for its advantages in simplifying container deployment, scalability and scheduling. Networking is one of the central components of Kubernetes, providing connectivity between different pods (group of containers) both within the same host and across hosts. To bootstrap Kubernetes networking, the Container Network Interface (CNI) provides a unified interface for the interaction between container runtimes. There are several CNI implementations, available as open-source ‘CNI plugins’. While they differ in functionality and performance, it is a challenge for a cloud provider to differentiate and choose the appropriate plugin for their environment. In this paper, we compare the various open source CNI plugins available from the community, qualitatively and through detailed quantitative measurements. With our experimental evaluation, we analyze the overheads and bottlenecks for each CNI plugin, as a result of the network model it implements, interaction with the host network protocol stack and the network policies implemented in iptables rules. The choice of the CNI plugin may also be based on whether intra-host or inter-host communication dominates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信