香茅及一些新型酰基硒脲和酰基脲衍生物的抗菌和抗氧化活性

{"title":"香茅及一些新型酰基硒脲和酰基脲衍生物的抗菌和抗氧化活性","authors":"","doi":"10.48112/bcs.v2i2.449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to tested  the antibacterial and antioxidant activities of two different plant extracts which were Syzygium aromaticum and Capparis spinosa, and five novel derivatives, i.e. [4-Nitro-N-((4-(N-(pyrimidin-2-yl) sulfamoyl) phenyl) carbamoselenoyl) Benz amide (1), 4-Methyl-N-((4-(N-(pyrimidin-2-yl) sulfamoyl) phenyl) carbamoselenoyl) Benz amide (2), 4-Methyl-N-((4-(N-(pyrimidin-2-yl) sulfamoyl phenyl) carbamothioyl) Benz amide (3), 4-Nitro-N-((4-nitrophenyl) carbamo selenoyl) Benz amide (4), N-(2,6-dioxo-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrimidine-1-carbonoselenoyl)-nitrobenzamide (5)] in six concentrations:1,5, 10,25, 50, and 100 ug/ml of plant extracts and in three concentrations. 500,750 ,1000ug/ml of novel synthesis compounds on gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus) and gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli). The antibacterial activity was evaluated with antibiotics susceptible and resistant to microorganisms. The 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging technique was used to assess antioxidant activity. The findings showed that Syzygium aromaticum extract and synthesis compound 3 were more effective against Escherichia coli bacteria and less effective against Staphylococcus aureus bacteria, whereas Capparis spinosa extract and synthesis compounds (1, 2, 4, and 5) were more effective against Staphylococcus aureus bacteria and less effective against Escherichia coli bacteria. The oxidation of the synthesis compounds (1, 2, and 3) is effective at concentrations of 500, 750, and 1000 and ineffective at concentrations of 50, 100, and 250, while compound 4 is effective at concentrations of 100, 250, 500, 750, and 1000 and ineffective at concentrations of 50 only. Compound 5 was effective at all concentrations.","PeriodicalId":176903,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicine and Chemical Sciences","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activities of Syzygium Aromaticum Capparis Spinosa, and Some Novel Acylselenourea and Acylthourea Derivatives\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.48112/bcs.v2i2.449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to tested  the antibacterial and antioxidant activities of two different plant extracts which were Syzygium aromaticum and Capparis spinosa, and five novel derivatives, i.e. [4-Nitro-N-((4-(N-(pyrimidin-2-yl) sulfamoyl) phenyl) carbamoselenoyl) Benz amide (1), 4-Methyl-N-((4-(N-(pyrimidin-2-yl) sulfamoyl) phenyl) carbamoselenoyl) Benz amide (2), 4-Methyl-N-((4-(N-(pyrimidin-2-yl) sulfamoyl phenyl) carbamothioyl) Benz amide (3), 4-Nitro-N-((4-nitrophenyl) carbamo selenoyl) Benz amide (4), N-(2,6-dioxo-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrimidine-1-carbonoselenoyl)-nitrobenzamide (5)] in six concentrations:1,5, 10,25, 50, and 100 ug/ml of plant extracts and in three concentrations. 500,750 ,1000ug/ml of novel synthesis compounds on gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus) and gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli). The antibacterial activity was evaluated with antibiotics susceptible and resistant to microorganisms. The 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging technique was used to assess antioxidant activity. The findings showed that Syzygium aromaticum extract and synthesis compound 3 were more effective against Escherichia coli bacteria and less effective against Staphylococcus aureus bacteria, whereas Capparis spinosa extract and synthesis compounds (1, 2, 4, and 5) were more effective against Staphylococcus aureus bacteria and less effective against Escherichia coli bacteria. The oxidation of the synthesis compounds (1, 2, and 3) is effective at concentrations of 500, 750, and 1000 and ineffective at concentrations of 50, 100, and 250, while compound 4 is effective at concentrations of 100, 250, 500, 750, and 1000 and ineffective at concentrations of 50 only. Compound 5 was effective at all concentrations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":176903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedicine and Chemical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedicine and Chemical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48112/bcs.v2i2.449\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicine and Chemical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48112/bcs.v2i2.449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在测试两种不同植物提取物(Syzygium aromaticum)和Capparis spinosa,以及5种新型衍生物[4-硝基-N-(4-(N-(嘧啶-2-基)氨基磺酰基)苯基)氨基氨基硒基)奔驰酰胺(1),4-甲基-N-((4-(N-(嘧啶-2-基)氨基磺酰基)苯基)氨基氨基硒基)奔驰酰胺(2),4-甲基-N-((4-(N-(嘧啶-2-基)氨基磺酰基)氨基磺酰基)奔驰酰胺(3),4-硝基-N-((4-硝基苯基)卡莫硒酰)奔驰酰胺(4),N-(2,6-二氧基-1,2,3,6-四氢嘧啶-1-碳硒酰)-硝基苯酰胺(5)]在6种浓度:1、5、10、25、50和100 ug/ml的植物提取物和3种浓度下。500、750、1000ug/ml新合成化合物对革兰氏阳性菌(金黄色葡萄球菌)和革兰氏阴性菌(大肠杆菌)作用。用抗生素敏感和耐药评价其抑菌活性。采用2,2 -二苯基-1-苦味酰肼(DPPH)自由基清除技术评价其抗氧化活性。结果表明,香薷提取物和合成化合物3对大肠杆菌的抑制效果较好,对金黄色葡萄球菌的抑制效果较差;刺毛柑提取物和合成化合物(1、2、4和5)对金黄色葡萄球菌的抑制效果较好,对大肠杆菌的抑制效果较差。合成化合物(1、2和3)的氧化在浓度为500、750和1000时有效,在浓度为50、100和250时无效,而化合物4在浓度为100、250、500、750和1000时有效,仅在浓度为50时无效。化合物5在所有浓度下均有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activities of Syzygium Aromaticum Capparis Spinosa, and Some Novel Acylselenourea and Acylthourea Derivatives
This study aims to tested  the antibacterial and antioxidant activities of two different plant extracts which were Syzygium aromaticum and Capparis spinosa, and five novel derivatives, i.e. [4-Nitro-N-((4-(N-(pyrimidin-2-yl) sulfamoyl) phenyl) carbamoselenoyl) Benz amide (1), 4-Methyl-N-((4-(N-(pyrimidin-2-yl) sulfamoyl) phenyl) carbamoselenoyl) Benz amide (2), 4-Methyl-N-((4-(N-(pyrimidin-2-yl) sulfamoyl phenyl) carbamothioyl) Benz amide (3), 4-Nitro-N-((4-nitrophenyl) carbamo selenoyl) Benz amide (4), N-(2,6-dioxo-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrimidine-1-carbonoselenoyl)-nitrobenzamide (5)] in six concentrations:1,5, 10,25, 50, and 100 ug/ml of plant extracts and in three concentrations. 500,750 ,1000ug/ml of novel synthesis compounds on gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus) and gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli). The antibacterial activity was evaluated with antibiotics susceptible and resistant to microorganisms. The 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging technique was used to assess antioxidant activity. The findings showed that Syzygium aromaticum extract and synthesis compound 3 were more effective against Escherichia coli bacteria and less effective against Staphylococcus aureus bacteria, whereas Capparis spinosa extract and synthesis compounds (1, 2, 4, and 5) were more effective against Staphylococcus aureus bacteria and less effective against Escherichia coli bacteria. The oxidation of the synthesis compounds (1, 2, and 3) is effective at concentrations of 500, 750, and 1000 and ineffective at concentrations of 50, 100, and 250, while compound 4 is effective at concentrations of 100, 250, 500, 750, and 1000 and ineffective at concentrations of 50 only. Compound 5 was effective at all concentrations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信