研究论文:临床医生对计算机检测感染的反应

B. Rocha, J. Christenson, R. Evans, R. Gardner
{"title":"研究论文:临床医生对计算机检测感染的反应","authors":"B. Rocha, J. Christenson, R. Evans, R. Gardner","doi":"10.1136/jamia.2001.0080117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To analyze whether computer-generated reminders about infections could influence clinicians' practice patterns and consequently improve the detection and manage- ment of nosocomial infections. Design: The conclusions produced by an expert system developed to detect and manage infections were presented to the attending clinicians in a pediatric hospital to determine whether this infor- mation could improve detection and management. Clinician interventions were compared before and after the implementation of the system. Measurements: The responses of the clinicians (staff physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners) to the reminders were determined by review of paper medical charts. Main outcome measures were the number of suggestions to treat and manage infections that were followed before and after the implementation of COMPISS (Computerized Pediatric Infection Surveillance System). The clinicians' opinions about the system were assessed by means of a paper questionnaire distrib- uted following the experiment. Results: The results failed to show a statistical difference between the clinicians' treatment strategies before and after implementation of the system (P > 0.33 for clinicians working in the emergency room and P > 0.45 for clinicians working in the pediatric intensive care unit). The questionnaire results showed that the respondents appreciated the information presented by the system. Conclusion: The computer-generated reminders about infections were unable to influence the practice patterns of clinicians. The methodologic problems that may have contributed to this negative result are discussed. � J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:117-125.","PeriodicalId":344533,"journal":{"name":"J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research Paper: Clinicians' Response to Computerized Detection of Infections\",\"authors\":\"B. Rocha, J. Christenson, R. Evans, R. Gardner\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jamia.2001.0080117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To analyze whether computer-generated reminders about infections could influence clinicians' practice patterns and consequently improve the detection and manage- ment of nosocomial infections. Design: The conclusions produced by an expert system developed to detect and manage infections were presented to the attending clinicians in a pediatric hospital to determine whether this infor- mation could improve detection and management. Clinician interventions were compared before and after the implementation of the system. Measurements: The responses of the clinicians (staff physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners) to the reminders were determined by review of paper medical charts. Main outcome measures were the number of suggestions to treat and manage infections that were followed before and after the implementation of COMPISS (Computerized Pediatric Infection Surveillance System). The clinicians' opinions about the system were assessed by means of a paper questionnaire distrib- uted following the experiment. Results: The results failed to show a statistical difference between the clinicians' treatment strategies before and after implementation of the system (P > 0.33 for clinicians working in the emergency room and P > 0.45 for clinicians working in the pediatric intensive care unit). The questionnaire results showed that the respondents appreciated the information presented by the system. Conclusion: The computer-generated reminders about infections were unable to influence the practice patterns of clinicians. The methodologic problems that may have contributed to this negative result are discussed. � J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:117-125.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.\",\"volume\":\"148 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2001.0080117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2001.0080117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

目的:分析计算机生成的感染提醒是否能影响临床医生的执业模式,从而提高医院感染的发现和管理水平。设计:将检测和管理感染的专家系统得出的结论提交给儿科医院的主治医生,以确定这些信息是否可以改善检测和管理。比较实施该系统前后临床医生的干预措施。测量:临床医生(主治医师、医师助理和执业护士)对提醒的反应是通过审查纸质医疗图表来确定的。主要观察指标为实施计算机化儿童感染监测系统(COMPISS)前后所遵循的感染治疗和管理建议的数量。临床医生对该系统的意见通过在实验后分发的纸质问卷进行评估。结果:系统实施前后临床医生的治疗策略差异无统计学意义(急诊室临床医生P > 0.33,儿科重症监护病房临床医生P > 0.45)。问卷调查结果显示,受访者对系统提供的信息表示赞赏。结论:计算机生成的感染提醒不能影响临床医生的执业模式。讨论了可能导致这一消极结果的方法学问题。[J]中华医学杂志,2001;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research Paper: Clinicians' Response to Computerized Detection of Infections
Objective: To analyze whether computer-generated reminders about infections could influence clinicians' practice patterns and consequently improve the detection and manage- ment of nosocomial infections. Design: The conclusions produced by an expert system developed to detect and manage infections were presented to the attending clinicians in a pediatric hospital to determine whether this infor- mation could improve detection and management. Clinician interventions were compared before and after the implementation of the system. Measurements: The responses of the clinicians (staff physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners) to the reminders were determined by review of paper medical charts. Main outcome measures were the number of suggestions to treat and manage infections that were followed before and after the implementation of COMPISS (Computerized Pediatric Infection Surveillance System). The clinicians' opinions about the system were assessed by means of a paper questionnaire distrib- uted following the experiment. Results: The results failed to show a statistical difference between the clinicians' treatment strategies before and after implementation of the system (P > 0.33 for clinicians working in the emergency room and P > 0.45 for clinicians working in the pediatric intensive care unit). The questionnaire results showed that the respondents appreciated the information presented by the system. Conclusion: The computer-generated reminders about infections were unable to influence the practice patterns of clinicians. The methodologic problems that may have contributed to this negative result are discussed. � J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:117-125.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信