从停牌到停牌:纳斯达克退市前后的市场质量

Venkatesh Panchapagesan, Ingrid M. Werner
{"title":"从停牌到停牌:纳斯达克退市前后的市场质量","authors":"Venkatesh Panchapagesan, Ingrid M. Werner","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.565325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stocks may be delisted from Nasdaq for violating one of the market's maintained listing requirements. These include non-core requirements such as a minimum bid price; core requirements such as a minimum market capitalization; and governance requirements such as SEC disclosure. In addition, firms are delisted when they file for bankruptcy. We examine 1,098 firms that were delisted from the Nasdaq NNM and Small Cap markets in 1999-2002, and were subsequently traded in the OTC Bulletin Board and/or the Pink Sheets. For our sample firms, share volume declines by two-thirds, quoted spreads more than double from 12.1 to 33.9 percent, and effective spreads triple from 3.3 to 9.9 percent when they are delisted from Nasdaq. Almost fifty percent of Nasdaq regulatory delistings during this period are violations of non-core requirements. The decline in market quality is significant even for firms that violate non-core criteria such as the minimum bid price. In light of our results, we argue that Nasdaq should consider revising some of its listing criteria. This would lower trading costs for thousands of investors in need of liquidity without compromising the market's integrity.","PeriodicalId":142706,"journal":{"name":"Fisher: Dice Center for Financial Economics/Finance (Topic)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Pink Slips to Pink Sheets: Market Quality Around Delisting from NASDAQ\",\"authors\":\"Venkatesh Panchapagesan, Ingrid M. Werner\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.565325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stocks may be delisted from Nasdaq for violating one of the market's maintained listing requirements. These include non-core requirements such as a minimum bid price; core requirements such as a minimum market capitalization; and governance requirements such as SEC disclosure. In addition, firms are delisted when they file for bankruptcy. We examine 1,098 firms that were delisted from the Nasdaq NNM and Small Cap markets in 1999-2002, and were subsequently traded in the OTC Bulletin Board and/or the Pink Sheets. For our sample firms, share volume declines by two-thirds, quoted spreads more than double from 12.1 to 33.9 percent, and effective spreads triple from 3.3 to 9.9 percent when they are delisted from Nasdaq. Almost fifty percent of Nasdaq regulatory delistings during this period are violations of non-core requirements. The decline in market quality is significant even for firms that violate non-core criteria such as the minimum bid price. In light of our results, we argue that Nasdaq should consider revising some of its listing criteria. This would lower trading costs for thousands of investors in need of liquidity without compromising the market's integrity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fisher: Dice Center for Financial Economics/Finance (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fisher: Dice Center for Financial Economics/Finance (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.565325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisher: Dice Center for Financial Economics/Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.565325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

股票可能会因为违反市场维持的上市要求之一而从纳斯达克摘牌。其中包括非核心要求,如最低投标价格;核心要求,如最低市值;以及SEC披露等治理要求。此外,申请破产的公司也会被摘牌。我们研究了1999-2002年间从纳斯达克NNM和小盘股市场退市的1,098家公司,这些公司随后在场外公告板和/或粉红单进行交易。对于我们的样本公司,当他们从纳斯达克退市时,股票交易量下降了三分之二,报价价差从12.1%增加到33.9%,有效价差从3.3%增加到9.9%。在此期间,几乎有50%的纳斯达克退市是违反非核心要求的。即使对违反非核心标准(如最低投标价格)的公司来说,市场质量的下降也是显著的。根据我们的研究结果,我们认为纳斯达克应该考虑修改一些上市标准。这将降低成千上万需要流动性的投资者的交易成本,同时又不会损害市场的完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Pink Slips to Pink Sheets: Market Quality Around Delisting from NASDAQ
Stocks may be delisted from Nasdaq for violating one of the market's maintained listing requirements. These include non-core requirements such as a minimum bid price; core requirements such as a minimum market capitalization; and governance requirements such as SEC disclosure. In addition, firms are delisted when they file for bankruptcy. We examine 1,098 firms that were delisted from the Nasdaq NNM and Small Cap markets in 1999-2002, and were subsequently traded in the OTC Bulletin Board and/or the Pink Sheets. For our sample firms, share volume declines by two-thirds, quoted spreads more than double from 12.1 to 33.9 percent, and effective spreads triple from 3.3 to 9.9 percent when they are delisted from Nasdaq. Almost fifty percent of Nasdaq regulatory delistings during this period are violations of non-core requirements. The decline in market quality is significant even for firms that violate non-core criteria such as the minimum bid price. In light of our results, we argue that Nasdaq should consider revising some of its listing criteria. This would lower trading costs for thousands of investors in need of liquidity without compromising the market's integrity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信