《创世纪》第1章《禧年记》第2章

J. Vanderkam
{"title":"《创世纪》第1章《禧年记》第2章","authors":"J. Vanderkam","doi":"10.1163/156851794X00130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the full text of Jubilees became available for western scholarly consumption in the mid-nineteenth century, it soon became the object of sundry comparative studies. The earliest estimates of its date placed it in the first century CE (Dillmann, for one), but later R.H. Charles made the classic case for dating the book to the end of the second century BCE.' Whichever of these dates one preferred, it was obvious to all that Jubilees postdated the Hebrew version of Genesis-Exodus and predated the earliest rabbinic and patristic exegetical works. Thus, the book stood at an ancient point in the history of interpreting Genesis-Exodus. It embodied both unique exegetical stands and hermeneutical moves that were familiar from later texts. Unlike most later commentaries, however, Jubilees bills itself, not merely as an explication of the divinely given words to Moses, but as revelation: its words come from the tablets of heaven and are mediated to Moses by an angel of the presence (1:29-2:1). The evidence from Qumran helps us to see how one group considered Jubilees authoritative: not only have remnants of 14 or 15 copies of the book been found there,2 but the Damascus Document certainly cites it as an authority, and 4Q2283 probably does as well. From the point of view of scriptural exegesis, one of the more interesting passages for comparative purposes is the creation account in Jubilees 2. It is obviously based upon Genesis 1-2, but","PeriodicalId":265457,"journal":{"name":"From Revelation to Canon","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genesis 1 in Jubilees 2\",\"authors\":\"J. Vanderkam\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/156851794X00130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After the full text of Jubilees became available for western scholarly consumption in the mid-nineteenth century, it soon became the object of sundry comparative studies. The earliest estimates of its date placed it in the first century CE (Dillmann, for one), but later R.H. Charles made the classic case for dating the book to the end of the second century BCE.' Whichever of these dates one preferred, it was obvious to all that Jubilees postdated the Hebrew version of Genesis-Exodus and predated the earliest rabbinic and patristic exegetical works. Thus, the book stood at an ancient point in the history of interpreting Genesis-Exodus. It embodied both unique exegetical stands and hermeneutical moves that were familiar from later texts. Unlike most later commentaries, however, Jubilees bills itself, not merely as an explication of the divinely given words to Moses, but as revelation: its words come from the tablets of heaven and are mediated to Moses by an angel of the presence (1:29-2:1). The evidence from Qumran helps us to see how one group considered Jubilees authoritative: not only have remnants of 14 or 15 copies of the book been found there,2 but the Damascus Document certainly cites it as an authority, and 4Q2283 probably does as well. From the point of view of scriptural exegesis, one of the more interesting passages for comparative purposes is the creation account in Jubilees 2. It is obviously based upon Genesis 1-2, but\",\"PeriodicalId\":265457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"From Revelation to Canon\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"From Revelation to Canon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/156851794X00130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"From Revelation to Canon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/156851794X00130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

在《禧年》全文于19世纪中期供西方学者使用后,它很快成为各种比较研究的对象。最早的估计它的年代是在公元一世纪(比如迪曼),但后来R.H.查尔斯提出了经典的案例,认为这本书的年代是公元前二世纪末。”无论选择哪一个日期,对所有人来说,禧年都明显晚于希伯来语版本的《创世纪-出埃及记》,早于最早的拉比和教父的训诂著作。因此,这本书站在解释创世记-出埃及记的历史上一个古老的点上。它既体现了独特的训诂立场,也体现了后来的文本所熟悉的解释学动作。然而,与后来的大多数注释不同的是,《禧年记》宣称自己不仅是对神赐给摩西的话语的解释,而且是一种启示:它的话语来自天上的石板,并由一位在场的天使传达给摩西(1:29-2:1)。来自库姆兰的证据帮助我们看到一个团体是如何认为禧年是权威的:不仅在那里发现了14或15本残存的书,2而且大马士革文献肯定引用它作为权威,4Q2283可能也是如此。从圣经释经的角度来看,比较而言,更有趣的段落之一是《禧年记》第2章中关于创造的叙述。显然是基于创世纪1-2,但是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genesis 1 in Jubilees 2
After the full text of Jubilees became available for western scholarly consumption in the mid-nineteenth century, it soon became the object of sundry comparative studies. The earliest estimates of its date placed it in the first century CE (Dillmann, for one), but later R.H. Charles made the classic case for dating the book to the end of the second century BCE.' Whichever of these dates one preferred, it was obvious to all that Jubilees postdated the Hebrew version of Genesis-Exodus and predated the earliest rabbinic and patristic exegetical works. Thus, the book stood at an ancient point in the history of interpreting Genesis-Exodus. It embodied both unique exegetical stands and hermeneutical moves that were familiar from later texts. Unlike most later commentaries, however, Jubilees bills itself, not merely as an explication of the divinely given words to Moses, but as revelation: its words come from the tablets of heaven and are mediated to Moses by an angel of the presence (1:29-2:1). The evidence from Qumran helps us to see how one group considered Jubilees authoritative: not only have remnants of 14 or 15 copies of the book been found there,2 but the Damascus Document certainly cites it as an authority, and 4Q2283 probably does as well. From the point of view of scriptural exegesis, one of the more interesting passages for comparative purposes is the creation account in Jubilees 2. It is obviously based upon Genesis 1-2, but
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信